We performed a comparison between IBM Spectrum Protect, Iron Mountain Connect, and Veeam Backup & Replication based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Zerto, Commvault and others in Backup and Recovery."We do not lose data. That is why we are using this product and have a backup in place."
"What I found most valuable in IBM Spectrum Protect is that it allows you to back up physical machines, and its proxy feature lets you back up virtual machines."
"One way they have improved our organization is through the stability of the solution and the availability of the product."
"Technical support is okay. We have not had many issues with them."
"From a tech perspective, utilizing deduplication is one of the most valuable features."
"It is a very good and mature enterprise product. Once it is set up and everything is put in, you don't have to manage it. It actually runs automatically by itself."
"Data archiving is easier and less time-consuming."
"The archiving feature is the most valuable aspect of the solution."
"The most valuable feature for me is the policy management capabilities"
"What I like most about this solution are the simplicity and the price-performance ratio."
"The most valuable features I have found to be Instant Recovery, quick restore and rollback, and asynchronous copy. It is a complete solution for our needs."
"It serves its intended purpose and it works well."
"Very reliable and easy to use."
"Veeam is quick, easy to work with, and its support for Microsoft products is good. They also provide adequate solutions for backing up Microsoft applications in the cloud, such as Office 365."
"It is a straightforward solution. There is no need for a dedicated technical person to do the backup and replication. Veeam is very straightforward when it comes to doing the replication."
"I think the interface is straightforward"
"My customers find the backup and recovery ease of use is the most beneficial feature."
"The initial setup is complex."
"Perhaps some better documentation, which I believe was better in the past."
"The version that we had when I first started made it look really bad. We are talking about commands that should have run in two seconds, but instead took four to eight hours. Other components were sluggish."
"It needs some software upgrades to fix some of its current bugs."
"The licensing isn't very clear. They should work to simply or clarify the cost structure."
"It lacks reporting and an efficient alert mechanism. The GUI could also be improved."
"Their support is lacking. I've talked to their developers and stuff in the last couple of weeks and they reassure me that some people have retired, and they're working on getting that bumped back up. But the support lacks a lot to be desired at this point."
"We would like to see capabilities of long-term archiving and more support for hardware platforms."
"I would like to see more integration with different platforms."
"The web interface could be more visual."
"Veeam Backup & Replication should include a cloud solution."
"The backup and integration could be improved."
"The implementation was straightforward. However, we used an integrator, the process could be easier for us to do it ourselves."
"The automation could be better."
"The Veeam backup application interface is application-based and not web-based."
"If a single file is corrupt then the restoration of the entire backup will fail."
"There is some complexity we have experienced when using the solution that should be simplified."
