IBM B2B Integrator vs SWIFTnet FIN vs webMethods Trading Networks comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Logo
1,686 views|814 comparisons
85% willing to recommend
SWIFT Logo
1,028 views|840 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Software AG Logo
362 views|193 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM B2B Integrator, SWIFTnet FIN, and webMethods Trading Networks based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware.
To learn more, read our detailed Business-to-Business Middleware Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It is easy of use and it's easy to maintain. It's also faster to on-board partners.""The technical support on offer through the portal is very helpful and responsive.""The most valuable feature of IBM B2B Integrator is its security and flexibility.""The solution is useful for transferring files from one format to another format. Also, the solution is useful in translation.""This solution allows for easy integration with heterogeneous applications.""The solution offers good integration capabilities.""B2B provides a secure communication channel.""Very flexible product; it allows implementing different flows on the same infrastructure."

More IBM B2B Integrator Pros →

"It provides the ability to interact with financial institutions and apply the same rules."

More SWIFTnet FIN Pros →

"webMethods Trading Networks is a good solution for interacting with outside of the organization. We can integrate the solutions with multiple outside the organization.""webMethods Trading Networks is a stable solution.""With webMethods, the creation of servers and the utilization of Trading Networks facilitate B2B integration. It resolves any related issues effectively."

More webMethods Trading Networks Pros →

Cons
"The web interface of B2B is quite outdated and not particularly user-friendly.""The mapping, visibility, deployment, and the dashboard could be improved and updated. The communication logs are very poor. They are not easily understood, and we need to navigate to many places for many reasons. You can't just pull the information; it's very tough.""Map translator needs more enhancements.""The dashboard is not integrated and should be bundled by the product vendor.""End-to-end visibility and monitoring application required. The control center is available and covers this area, but it still fails in many monitoring scenarios.""The tool requires you to write a lot of code in Java and XSLT, which makes development tough.""Patching or upgrading the product is a bit of a nightmare. It would be nice if they removed the installation manager port. We find it complicates upgrading and patching a great deal.""There are also some features in the solution that are not user-friendly, like code lists with no search options. So, we must navigate hundreds of pages to check for one entry."

More IBM B2B Integrator Cons →

"I would like for them to work in real-time."

More SWIFTnet FIN Cons →

"The solution should include REST API calls.""Perhaps in the area of Microservices, where I think Trading Networks could benefit from some improvements."

More webMethods Trading Networks Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We pay an annual fee based on the number of VPUs. It's fairly reasonable. We're in the middle of analyzing other products, and they're all pretty much in the same range."
  • "The solution is priced at $20,000 to $30,000 per year with no extra costs."
  • "The pricing is based on how many cores are used and the type of cores."
  • "Licensing depends upon the package you opt for within the solution. The solution is a bit costly compared to the other integration tools in the market."
  • "The price of IBM B2B Integrator is too high. However, IBM may be willing to give a discount if there are negotiations. If they see that there is a good opportunity for them they can provide a discount."
  • "The product costs more than 40K."
  • More IBM B2B Integrator Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
  • "webMethods Trading Networks is a bit costly compared to others solutions."
  • More webMethods Trading Networks Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.
    769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:IBM B2B Integrator is a great tool, robust, reliable, low-maintenance, and ideal solution.
    Top Answer:API integration could be improved. The legacy system could be on the cloud.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:webMethods Trading Networks is a stable solution.
    Top Answer:Since webMethods Trading Networks is much like proprietary software, users should try it on the trial version first and… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    1,686
    Comparisons
    814
    Reviews
    9
    Average Words per Review
    450
    Rating
    7.9
    Views
    1,028
    Comparisons
    840
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    362
    Comparisons
    193
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    IBM Sterling B2B Integrator, Sterling Gentran Integration Suite
    Learn More
    Overview

    IBM B2B Integrator helps you securely integrate complex B2B processes with your partner communities. It provides a single, flexible B2B gateway that enables your organization to meet a wide range of B2B integration needs. The solution can improve business processes beyond enterprise boundaries and increase visibility into and across supply and demand chains.

    FIN enables financial institutions to exchange individual structured (MT and ISO 15022 message formats) financial messages securely and reliably. FIN is used by over 10,800 financial institutions and their corporate customers worldwide to exchange over 22.3+ million messages per day across a wide range of business areas within the banking and securities industries.

    FIN value-added processing includes:

    • Message validation to ensure messages are formatted according to SWIFT message standards.
    • Delivery monitoring and prioritization.
    • Message storage and retrieval.

    It is based on a distributed processing architecture with full, built-in redundancy to ensure maximum availability.

    webMethods Trading Networks is a scalable, easy-to-manage gateway for doing business electronically with customers, distributors and trading partners worldwide. This enterprise class B2B gateway is built on webMethods Integration Server, our Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) that automates B2B transactions, such as purchase requisitions, orders and invoices. 

    Sample Customers
    Bonnie Plants, Toshiba Europe, Florida Hospital
    Alcatel-Lucent, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Canadian National Railway, General Electric Company, Huawei, Novartis International, Standard Bank, UniCredit, Volvo
    Gist Limited, U.S. Bank, Staples
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Transportation Company12%
    Pharma/Biotech Company12%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Retailer9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm57%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Comms Service Provider4%
    Retailer4%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Educational Organization7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise66%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise64%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business11%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise82%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business34%
    Midsize Enterprise3%
    Large Enterprise63%
    Buyer's Guide
    Business-to-Business Middleware
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware. Updated: April 2024.
    769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.