We performed a comparison between Grafana and MightyRecruiter based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability."Grafana's best features are live monitoring and alerts."
"The most valuable feature of Grafana is the ease to build dashboards from observability construction. Additionally, the page services and integration are good."
"We can write queries in different languages, which is beneficial for visualization."
"Compatibility with Prometheus databases and the Spring Boot application make it the first choice when moving toward an SRE model."
"The solution has good features."
"The most valuable thing was that it had a good visualization tool."
"Grafana is a very scalable product. It's a really good product."
"It has good stability."
"I received several good candidates through the site."
"What needed to be done was clear from the beginning, no hidden intent."
"Guidelines are on the landing page"
"Their service is free."
""My jobs" is the best feature of this tool, because it brings me the opportunity to set a profile and put it on the page for companies to know my abilities and recruit me as a new talent."
"This tool offers the opportunity for a professional to search for a job aligned with his/her talent, then fit the company, who is looking for new employees, with the person who has the right skills."
"It is simple and practical, which allows me to save time when looking for the right personnel for my company."
"The UX is very user friendly."
"The documentation or training provided by Grafana is limited compared to its competitors, like Splunk."
"Lacks in-depth graphs and sufficient AI."
"Its UI features to create charts can also be improved. Some features could have a link to the documentation."
"The solution has room for improvement with a better API to help automate the construction of the dashboards easier."
"The main drawback is the necessity for endpoint monitoring."
"I had issues with the solution's configuration part."
"Lacks event management which affects our DevOps people."
"Multiple dashboards combined into one dashboard has slowed things down for us."
"Includes a pro column for what other traits someone carries, which do not directly impact an organisation currently but are good to have."
"There could be a better user onboarding experience."
"The only improvement I would make would be allowing the jobs to go live faster."
"Provides additional skill sets for the users apart from what they have learned in an organisation."
"The interface is a bit formal. It is unusually dull in color and design."
"Required to use a title provided from MightyRecruiter."
"This version has multiple options in the menu bar. It should be less complex, by combining some options."
"They could amplify the range of companies for some profiles. Sometimes, you put your professional resume and only get results from the US. There must be more options for some people and for their profession."
Earn 20 points
Grafana is ranked 6th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 38 reviews while MightyRecruiter doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Grafana is rated 8.0, while MightyRecruiter is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Grafana writes "Agent-free with great dashboards and an active community". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MightyRecruiter writes "The candidate ranking and matching is top notch and is on par with or even better than many paid options". Grafana is most compared with New Relic, Azure Monitor, Sentry, Dynatrace and Elastic Observability, whereas MightyRecruiter is most compared with .
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.