We performed a comparison between Galvanize HighBond and Nexthink based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC."The most valuable feature is automation."
"With this solution we are able to link issues to automatic actions that will solve the problem."
"We have found the combination of analytics and automation in this solution to be very valuable to our organization, as it allows for us to perform auto-resolution on customer issues."
"I would rate the solution's stability a nine out of ten."
"The initial setup is very simple."
"It is a very stable product with regular security and feature updates."
"All the features of Nexthink are really useful when it comes to providing visibility into the endpoints and the services that we are monitoring, but the most interesting and useful features are the campaign and remote actions."
"Nexthink allows our customers to have visibility into their whole environment and security. And it lets you install the agent as a package for selected users instead of every user. This helps cut down on the delay involved in a bulk installation."
"In the past two years, the biggest benefit is that we have been able to identify 57,000-plus defects. These are possible tickets that we are preventing by using Nexthink."
"The cost of the solution is expensive and needs improvement."
"In our company, we can't deploy anything from Nexthink the way we can deploy from any other endpoint solutions. It is not possible to create any dashboard in Nexthink...One should be able to schedule monitoring in Nexthink."
"There are many limitations. If I'm using a Windows 10 system and Windows has certain restrictions, Nexthink won't be able to penetrate into the Windows OS due to those restrictions."
"The stability of this solution could be greatly improved to avoid performance issues."
"They can improve the Nexthink action module."
"The tool should improve its pricing and performance. It also have nothing related to patch management."
"We would like to see the reporting in this solution improved. At present there are gaps in the data it reports."
"I would like it if they could put in some patch deployments and compliances."
"We have provided them feedback on a few changes we would like to see with how alerting can work. Rather than have somebody looking at the network, if network utilization goes above a certain point, it would be helpful if the solution issued an alert to the right people."
Galvanize HighBond is ranked 9th in GRC with 3 reviews while Nexthink is ranked 1st in Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) with 20 reviews. Galvanize HighBond is rated 8.6, while Nexthink is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Galvanize HighBond writes "Good automation and analytics, but is costly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nexthink writes " A monitoring tool that helps save the time of its users with its features while offering a reasonable amount of stability and scalability". Galvanize HighBond is most compared with ACL Analytics, Workiva Wdesk and RSA Archer, whereas Nexthink is most compared with SysTrack, ControlUp, Alluvio Aternity , Liquidware Stratusphere UX and ConnectWise Automate.
We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.