We performed a comparison between Entrust Identity Enterprise and SailPoint IdentityIQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is a scalable solution. You can add users and credentials without problems."
"This solution is flexible and easy to use for our clients. We use it with different kinds of applications and integrate it with different processes."
"Entrust is an enterprise account, and they have a support system. Their training is also top-notch, and they are willing to share their knowledge with their partners."
"The integration matrix of the solution is huge compared to others."
"I am impressed with Entrust because they are one of the most advanced identity access management companies. Their portfolio of products is well aligned with the CISA zero trust framework. If you compare the features of Entrust products with the CISA pillars of zero trust, you'll see that they're perfectly matched with CISA requirements."
"The tool is quite stable and user-friendly."
"We are happy with the SailPoint IdentityIQ’s stability."
"It is a stable tool, which we run in our complex environment."
"I like IdentityIQ's granular attachment management and certification customization features."
"The Certification and Provisioning features are most valuable."
"Provisioning in multiple environments."
"Deployment takes a bit of time, however, once it's done properly, everything becomes very organized and easy to use."
"Good life cycle management, segregation of duties, and analytics features."
"It functions well on-premises, but integrating it with cloud services like AWS or Azure could be challenging. There are issues with cloud integrations, such as Azure, AWS, and GCP."
"The product is very costly compared to other alternative solutions."
"We are introducing new processes and are migrating to a new version. Once we explore new functionalities, we'll be able to assess what could be improved."
"I would like to improve the tool's implementation and pricing."
"What it doesn't do is provide notice in the event of a vulnerability or offense from the security."
"I would like to see more Cloud management from this product."
"The product’s cloud offering could be flexible."
"The report functionality and dashboard of the access manager could be improved."
"The connector for EPIC, ServiceNow, and Duo."
"They should lower the price and technical support should be better."
"Scalability is hard, especially when you are doing it in real time."
"Certifications could include additional access levels or practices."
Entrust Identity Enterprise is ranked 9th in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) with 7 reviews while SailPoint IdentityIQ is ranked 4th in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) with 61 reviews. Entrust Identity Enterprise is rated 8.8, while SailPoint IdentityIQ is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Entrust Identity Enterprise writes "Provides strong authentication feature, which requires users to enter a one-time password (OTP) ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SailPoint IdentityIQ writes "Flexible, easy to customize, and not too difficult to set up". Entrust Identity Enterprise is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, DigiCert PKI Platform, Cisco Duo, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and RSA Authentication Manager, whereas SailPoint IdentityIQ is most compared with Saviynt, Microsoft Entra ID, One Identity Manager, ForgeRock and Okta Workforce Identity. See our Entrust Identity Enterprise vs. SailPoint IdentityIQ report.
See our list of best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
