We performed a comparison between DX Performance Management and HPE OneView based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two DX NetOps solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We have been able to get a little bit better at seeing more things in real time and more just in time, so we're less reactionary."
"It can be easily integrated with other systems and is powerful enough to collect data from a large number of devices."
"The feature that is inherent to its core, of being able to graphically represent a trend and status, is nice."
"There is a good amount of vendor certification which comes with the product. That's all factory-loaded, no need to load any custom-made files. Most of the metrics are calibrated and captured from the devices based on the defaults available from vendor certification."
"When we deployed it, right out of the box we were able to stand up Performance Management within two weeks, in our production environment, with full discovery and relevant information, actual information, that we could use in our command center, our 24/7 operations center."
"We're able to present data from multiple back-end collection sources into a single dashboard for the users. So they don't have to go to multiple locations to get data about a particular item, or device."
"Downloads and records are the most valuable features."
"There is another component of the tool called Network Flow Analysis. It gives us the ability to troubleshoot issues which do not appear right away."
"Gives the business interfaces to view real-time pictures of IT business services."
"The most valuable features of HPE OneView are environment monitoring, the ease of firmware upgrade, and the ability to manage all the servers and the infrastructure from one team."
"It monitors all our servers, and if there is any problem it straight away sends us an alert. If It's a faulty component, we can see it from there. It sends an alert."
"If you have a lot of devices, like we do, then you have to have one single pane of view, otherwise we lose too much time. So, we needed this type of solution."
"Just the ability to provision the servers with storage and network everything within one interface, not having to go into multiple interfaces to provision those pieces."
"We get templates, so it's speed to delivery for us. It's a big difference with the template features."
"By being able to deploy servers very quickly and rapidly, we can respond to any business requirement needed."
"Deploys faster new virtual services."
"I have mixed feeling about the scalability. I feel like there are things which are being put into UIM right now that are not being included in Performance Center that we need to see in Performance Center. We are kind of being driven to buy UIM, and I can't justify it."
"The solution could improve the database model. It is also not very good because they have a lot of interconnections with other data sources, such as NFA and VNA."
"This solution is not very scalable."
"Policies could be improved."
"Even though we can see when something is not available, it would also be it would be nice if some sort of alerting took place to that you could know immediately if something went down."
"I would like to have more tasks, graphs, and possibilities for linking to the graphs and reports added to the solution."
"DX Performance Management should increase high availability. If one of my two data centers goes offline and the other is operational, I need a seamless transition from the primary to the secondary data center. It's crucial to maintain consistent monitoring of the devices during this transition. Therefore, I require continuous, 24/7 monitoring of my system using this tool."
"We experience disconnections between the solutions own components."
"One thing which is missing is that you can't actually log a support call yourself."
"I would like to see support for things that aren't in the current generation. We have a lot of 7th and 8th generation hardware."
"Integration could be improved. Sometimes OneView doesn't identify physical hardware."
"Technical support is not very good. The engineers do not know a lot about the product, even when asked simplistic questions."
"Those features, coming in version 4, that we're looking for are the discovery, primarily. But I think the scope-based access control is of interest, although, we didn't see any directory integration, so that, in itself, seems like it's still limited."
"I have to chop it up into smaller parts, because I have an installation in Europe and it covers the whole world. That is not so good. They need to be more localized, so I am going to chop it up into smaller bits."
"We have a version 3 and a version 1.2, but the upgrade process from the 1.2 to the 3 is kind of an issue."
"It would be better if we can add every HPE device to OneView, such as MSA, as well as the other servers like the DL server and ML server."
DX Performance Management is ranked 2nd in DX NetOps with 31 reviews while HPE OneView is ranked 17th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 80 reviews. DX Performance Management is rated 8.2, while HPE OneView is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of DX Performance Management writes "The vertical database loads faster than any other product available". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE OneView writes "Provides firmware compliance and the ability to connect to iPO". DX Performance Management is most compared with DX Spectrum, Zabbix and OmniPeek, whereas HPE OneView is most compared with Cisco Intersight, Dell CloudIQ, Zabbix, SolarWinds NPM and Lenovo XClarity Orchestrator. See our DX Performance Management vs. HPE OneView report.
We monitor all DX NetOps reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
