We performed a comparison between Centrify Endpoint Services [EOL] and Symantec Privileged Access Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SentinelOne, CrowdStrike and others in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)."he solution is an anti-malware product that integrates well with other vendor products such as firewalls, SIEM, etc. It captures threat intelligence and gives you better visibility. The product also has sandboxing features."
"We have FortiEDR installed on all our systems. This protects them from any threats."
"This is stable and scalable."
"The features that I have found most valuable are the ability to customize it and to reduce its size. It lets you run in a very small window in terms of memory and resources on legacy cash registers."
"The product detects and blocks threats and is more proactive than firewalls."
"NGAV and EDR features are outstanding."
"Ability to get forensics details and also memory exfiltration."
"The product's initial setup phase is very easy."
"The most valuable feature in Centrify is the ability to authenticate in a Linux environment, because this is what my customers were looking for. They are coming from a Linux environment, so they appreciate the identity and access management for allowing Linux workloads to authenticate securely."
"It's easy to use and easy to configure."
"CA PAM is working well for us."
"The two factor authentication, and the single most important capability was it supported PIV and CAC as one of the two factors. That was pretty huge for us."
"The RDP-gateway: For limiting which server an operator can access."
"Stability is solid as a rock."
"The product is very scalable in terms of concurrent sessions that it can handle at a time, number of device it can support, accounts that it can manage, or number of nodes that you can deploy in a cluster."
"We can enforce complicated password policies and very important frequent password changes."
"The interface is very friendly, colorful, and bold."
"To improve Fortinet, we need to see more features and technology areas at the endpoint level introduced."
"The dashboard isn't easy to access and manage."
"The security should be strong for the cloud. Some applications are on-prem and some are on the cloud. Fortinet should also have strong security for the cloud. There should be more security for the cloud."
"The only minor concern is occasional interference with desired programs."
"The solution is not stable."
"ZTNA can improve latency."
"I think cloud security and SASE are areas of concern in the product where improvements are required. The tool's cloud version has to be improved in terms of the security it offers."
"The support needs improvement."
"What can be improved in Centrify is the integration between the on-premise environment, specifically for Linux environments with the cloud infrastructure, such as Microsoft as it was during my time as a solution architect."
"I would like this solution to be simpler. It should have a one-click access that works together with AWS."
"They need to have zero tier and active-active setup with zero minimum downtime, which they are working on it. "
"The management console could be improved."
"The service account management functionality needs to be extended to application pools, SQL database, PowerShell scripts, service account discovery, etc."
"They need to do a little bit more on the mainframe side."
"The setup is complex."
"Bring more technology into the portfolio and being able to collapse those products into a much more integrated way."
"It's difficult to locate the reports, there are limits on what reports can be run from the GUI, and the report formats are lacking."
More Symantec Privileged Access Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Centrify Endpoint Services [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) while Symantec Privileged Access Manager is ranked 18th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 50 reviews. Centrify Endpoint Services [EOL] is rated 7.0, while Symantec Privileged Access Manager is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Centrify Endpoint Services [EOL] writes "Has system multi-factor authentication abilities but is lacking connection between on-premise and cloud-based solutions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symantec Privileged Access Manager writes "Allows IT and consultants to access the infrastructure environment but needs more security and better support". Centrify Endpoint Services [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Symantec Privileged Access Manager is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, ARCON Privileged Access Management and Delinea Secret Server.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.