We performed a comparison between Brinqa and Nexthink based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management."The most valuable features of Brinqa are its data integration capabilities."
"It is a very stable product with regular security and feature updates."
"The search engine functionality that Nexthink has on the finder is terrific."
"The solution has reduced the time it takes to resolve issues."
"Nexthink's best features are Engage and Act, which we use in combination for self-healing use cases."
"Nexthink saves a lot of time for the technicians who work on the troubleshooting side...Nexthink provides its users with a very good point of overview and presentation."
"Nexthink allows our customers to have visibility into their whole environment and security. And it lets you install the agent as a package for selected users instead of every user. This helps cut down on the delay involved in a bulk installation."
"I would rate the solution's stability a nine out of ten."
"The solution is stable."
"Brinqa could improve in terms of the speed of their service and resource provision."
"We have provided them feedback on a few changes we would like to see with how alerting can work. Rather than have somebody looking at the network, if network utilization goes above a certain point, it would be helpful if the solution issued an alert to the right people."
"In our company, we can't deploy anything from Nexthink the way we can deploy from any other endpoint solutions. It is not possible to create any dashboard in Nexthink...One should be able to schedule monitoring in Nexthink."
"There are many limitations. If I'm using a Windows 10 system and Windows has certain restrictions, Nexthink won't be able to penetrate into the Windows OS due to those restrictions."
"We would like better connectivity with SCCM for on-premises infrastructure and autopilot for cloud deployment."
"Nexthink could have better integration with ITSM tools - at the moment, they only integrate with ServiceNow, so adding other tools, like HP SMAX, would be very useful."
"The solution could provide more training. There should be proper documentation on the solution because even for small issues we have needed to reach out to the support team. The person who is doing all the administration work should have the proper information, but the problem is the documentation is lacking. There is no proper training or documentation available. Nexthink is holding all the information. We want to learn, but you can not without the information."
"The stability of this solution could be greatly improved to avoid performance issues."
"The tool should improve its pricing and performance. It also have nothing related to patch management."
Brinqa is ranked 11th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 1 review while Nexthink is ranked 1st in Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) with 20 reviews. Brinqa is rated 7.0, while Nexthink is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Brinqa writes "Allows us to configure the risk algorithm to suit our specific needs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nexthink writes " A monitoring tool that helps save the time of its users with its features while offering a reasonable amount of stability and scalability". Brinqa is most compared with Vulcan Cyber, Axonius, Nucleus, Avalor and Tenable Nessus, whereas Nexthink is most compared with SysTrack, ControlUp, Alluvio Aternity , Liquidware Stratusphere UX and ConnectWise Automate.
We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
