Avalor vs Brinqa comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Avalor Security Logo
166 views|109 comparisons
Brinqa Logo
332 views|219 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Avalor and Brinqa based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Risk-Based Vulnerability Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Risk-Based Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:The most valuable features of Brinqa are its data integration capabilities.
Top Answer:I would rate the costliness of the solution at a seven out of ten. It is on the expensive side and there are some additional fees.
Top Answer:Brinqa could improve in terms of the speed of their service and resource provision. We felt they were somewhat slow in assisting us in maturing our processes. Additionally, we encountered some… more »
Ranking
Views
166
Comparisons
109
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
332
Comparisons
219
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
746
Rating
7.0
Comparisons
Learn More
Avalor Security
Video Not Available
Overview

Our data fabric architecture integrates disparate data sources from legacy systems, data lakes, data warehouses, sql databases, and apps, providing a holistic view of business performance.
Automation, 2-way sync, alerts, and analytics live on top of the platform, powered by the data fabric.
All security functions benefit from fast, reliable, and precise analysis of enterprise data including asset coverage, compliance reporting, ROSI analysis, vulnerability management, and more.

Brinqa GRC provides a pluggable set of building blocks for meeting your IT process governance, risk management, and compliance reporting needs.
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm21%
Computer Software Company13%
Insurance Company9%
Retailer8%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business15%
Midsize Enterprise7%
Large Enterprise78%
Buyer's Guide
Risk-Based Vulnerability Management
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management. Updated: April 2024.
768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Avalor is ranked 16th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management while Brinqa is ranked 11th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 1 review. Avalor is rated 0.0, while Brinqa is rated 7.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Brinqa writes "Allows us to configure the risk algorithm to suit our specific needs". Avalor is most compared with Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM), Tenable Vulnerability Management, Vulcan Cyber, Nucleus and Tenable Security Center, whereas Brinqa is most compared with Vulcan Cyber, Axonius, Nucleus, Tenable Nessus and Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM).

See our list of best Risk-Based Vulnerability Management vendors.

We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.