We performed a comparison between Avada Software Infrared360 and VMware RabbitMQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability."Monitoring that ties into our incident management system"
"It has role-based access to queues, giving us more insights into problems."
"It's what we use for monitoring our MQ system, so the features that they provide are just really, really good."
"We have easily created use case testing harnesses for specific flows that incorporate various message types."
"The administration piece makes it very easy to do MQ administration. It gives us a lot more flexibility and capabilities."
"It allows non-technical users to inspect their individual components within the total infrastructure without disturbing other components and without bothering the technical teams."
"The solution's best feature is its exceptional speed, delivering efficient utilization of resources."
"RabbitMQ provides access to SDKs for development and the ability to raise and log tickets if we encounter issues. We can integrate RabbitMQ using various languages like Java or Python using the provided SDKs."
"Companies can scale the solution, so long as they have server room."
"The security is great."
"The most valuable feature for me is that it is open source. The licensing costs are really low and they are transparent."
"We have been able to set up a messaging system that facilitates data integration between the software modules that we sell."
"The product's reliability is the most valuable feature."
"I like the high throughput of 20K messages/sec, and that it supports multiple protocols."
"We are still working with the FTE/MFT subscription monitoring and reporting functionality. That is an area in which we would like to see further development taking place."
"The user interface could be sexier and more ergonomic. The competing products have similar problems."
"Some of the graphics in the interface could be improved. It's pretty basic. Some interfaces are not up to what you're used to seeing on other, more Windows-like tools."
"One area where they could improve is with their documentation. Some sections are not up to date with new release information and providing additional samples in some areas would be very helpful."
"We desire a dashboard that could accumulate BOQ lengths per tenant on one screen for all tenants."
"The UI can be cumbersome - but we are still using the Viper interface and we have not had the time to check out the Alloy interface which is supposed to be much improved."
"If you're outside IP address range, the clustering no longer has all the features which is problematic."
"Implementing a circuit breaker scenario using RabbitMQ is complicated. This complexity arises because manual intervention is required to manage worker details and handle operations based on worker IP addresses."
"The solution needs improvement on performance."
"They should improve on the ability to scale your queues in a very simple and elegant way with the same power that they have would be great."
"Their implementation is quite tricky. It's not that easy to implement RabbitMQ as a cluster."
"The fact that a single queue can't be distributed across multiple instances/nodes is a major disadvantage."
"I’d like this dashboard to use web sockets, so it would actually be in real time. It would slightly increase debugging, etc."
"The support feature could benefit from some improvement in terms of accessibility and responsiveness."
Earn 20 points
Avada Software Infrared360 is ranked 71st in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while VMware RabbitMQ is ranked 5th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 40 reviews. Avada Software Infrared360 is rated 8.8, while VMware RabbitMQ is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Avada Software Infrared360 writes "An offsite team performs a daily infrastructure health check and sends reports to the technical/management teams. ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware RabbitMQ writes "Reliable queueing functionality and versatile tool that can be used with any programming languages ". Avada Software Infrared360 is most compared with IBM MQ and Dynatrace, whereas VMware RabbitMQ is most compared with IBM MQ, Apache Kafka, Anypoint MQ, ActiveMQ and Red Hat AMQ.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
