We performed a comparison between Appian and SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."The technical support is excellent."
"It has good integrations. We were looking for out-of-the-box integration with both on-prem and publicly accessible data sources. We needed integration with the cloud, OData, our REST API feed, and then on-prem passthrough to go to a SQL database or on-prem APIs through Azure local deployment, etc."
"Since implementing we have had a faster time to solution, with fewer resources needed."
"Technical support has been amazing overall."
"I find the BPM the most valuable feature."
"What stands out are the speed of the product, the quick, easy development, and visual diagramming."
"The initial setup was seamless. We didn't run into any hardships at all."
"Recently, we added Appian Process Mining, Appian Portals, and now Appian RPA."
"My primary use case for this solution is to display the process in a graphical representation."
"Offline capabilities and responsive capabilities could be better. The mobility features of Appian platform are still evolving."
"Appian could be improved by making it a strict, no-code platform with free-built process packs."
"I would like to see more complete university tools. For example, with UiPath, I have had a good experience related to a free course in order to provide some users some different levels of knowledge. This extra training helps users not only use the solution but to develop further within the tool."
"While Appian is generally flexible, it's rigid in some ways. It takes longer to do something that isn't available out of the box."
"One of the areas that Appian is working on is to improve its UI capabilities and give more flexibility to the UI."
"It would be useful if they could create an academy or forum in the future to help active users answer questions they have about the solution."
"We would like to see more reduced latency. We would like to make sure that the scale-out factor will be much more as workloads come in."
"The documentation needs to be improved."
"The odata can be improved. It represents to users flexible process that can manage and monitor their own business process."
Earn 20 points
Appian is ranked 4th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 57 reviews while SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Business Process Management (BPM). Appian is rated 8.4, while SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of Appian writes "Low resource consumption, easy setup, and stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] writes "Why you should choose SAP BPM as process management discipline?". Appian is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, OutSystems, Camunda, ServiceNow and Pega BPM, whereas SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.