The fact that unifying policies will help us save time, costs, and be more efficient in general is very important for our company.

I appreciate that the central management of Cisco Secure Firewall is from one location, which saves a lot of time. The central management feature of Cisco Secure Firewall saves one location instead of having to log on to multiple locations, which speeds up deployment of any changes or requirements for monitoring.

These features benefit my company by reducing my troubleshooting time, and in the energy sector, time is money, so it does help. The time reduction depends on how quickly someone gets used to it.

The stability and service continuity are the most important return on investment that any company or organization can get from Cisco Secure Firewall solution because losing services translates to losing money.

I have seen ROI with Cisco Secure Firewall, as they definitely save time and provide peace of mind. Cisco Secure Firewall saves time and also saves money, definitely providing peace of mind.

Using Cisco Secure Firewall is financially beneficial as it provides clear settings for all members managing the solution, making it easy to teach the engineering team how it works and how to configure it, ultimately reducing the time needed to apply policies or make changes in the infrastructure.

When we do not talk about money, time has become the critical factor where Cato massively outperforms Cisco Secure Firewall.

The time we need to spend to triage any incidents or potential events is significantly reduced. Before events become incidents, we already have complete insights into who or which IP or source was attempting to reach what, whether it was crypto mining, and we receive all details about the category of URLs or endpoints on the internet the user was trying to access, including whether they were suspicious or potentially benign. The ability to classify these is crucial, and nothing can be done without Talos.