Our primary use is LAN and WAN links for our enterprise network.
Cisco Catalyst is used to connect all our WAN links to a central data center.
Our primary use is LAN and WAN links for our enterprise network.
Cisco Catalyst is used to connect all our WAN links to a central data center.
It has a very high cost, but understandably, due to its very good quality. This is the reason why some customers opt to buy cheaper brands with same/similar features.
Switching environments, as part of a LAN management solution, where the customer needs to build, operate, and maintain Layer 2 and Layer 3 networks for internal use.
It uses many protocols to ease operations, such as CDP and the interoperability of other Cisco products.
Perpetual POE is a valuable feature, because when the switch reboots, access points do not. This helps minimize infrastructure downtime and impacts internals.
The price should go down instead of up.
Network has increased stability, security, and usability. Cisco Catalyst has the ability to create new services for users, such as IP phones and video conference. We decreased budgets on the support corporate network and increased user satisfaction.
The most valuable features, to me, are CDP, VTP, ACLs, and routing.
These products help me dissect my network based on the users within a particular location. They've also provided me the capability to separate network traffic as necessary.
As a user, I would like to see the Layer 2 Switches to have NBAR capabilities as well. It would be nice if the new ISRs have firewall capabilities as well.
I've been using these products since 2008. I have a Cisco ISR 2821 and 2911, Cisco Catalyst 4500, 2960 and 3750 Series Switches.
No stability issues were experienced.
It would be nice to see these products have built-in wireless access points like MikroTik.
I am sorry, but I always go to the forums and not to technical support. I like understanding the system myself. That way it is easier for me to fix issues in the future.
I previously used D-Link Switches (which was a pain) due to the budget constraints. I switched because Cisco was the best option at the time compared to D-Link.
The setup was not complex. I already knew what I wanted and what I needed to do.
Get the best that your money can buy.
Don't ever sacrifice performance, it will stab you in the back if you do.
Cisco was the best and only option that I considered.
Real-world scenarios will always surprise you.
This is the Enterprise Class Switch platform. Technically it supports most deployment scenarios and things that you never know that it supports.
The hardware is the most reliable, I saw some Catalyst in hot and dusty racks, working hard and with no issues from a lot of years.
Great switching solution from Cisco!
It's resolved most of our customer communication needs.
It can be a little more cheaper.
We've had no issues with deployment.
We've had no issues with stability.
We've had no issues with scalability.
It's quite pricey.
At first glance this switch looks exactly like the an Ethernet switch, I would recommend that there be verbage in the documentation on exactly what gbit connectors are required.
We've been using it for eight years.
There have been no issues with the deployment.
The stability has never been an issue.
We've had no issues scaling it for our needs.
It's great.
Technical Support:It's great.
We didn't have anything in place and needed a fiber solution.
It was very straightforward.
We did it in-house with help from the vendor.
There were no other options looked at.
Make sure you get the right connectors.
Deliverability speed of the Terminal Access Controller.
I've used it for over four years.
No issues encountered.
No issues encountered.
There were issues with the maximum stackable switches per site & monitoring setup.
7/10.
Technical Support:
7/10.
We switched because we had weak tech support, especially for the PoE product.
It was a medium difficulty setup.
Licensing is one of the major areas of confusion for a person with a technical if they gain the verification from Cisco website.
We also looked at Dell options.
Ensure you select the right license, power supply and other components to install the switch into the rack.
1. Cisco 2960 catalysts switch has lots of security features (Port Security, block DHCP snooping, VLAN).
2. I can create a stack with multiple Cisco 2960 switch which improve availability
3. I can create a port channel by merging multiple port of multiple switches which help me transfer large amounts of data traffic between serveres and it also increases reliability if one switch port becomes damaged.
4. It provides PoE (Power over Ethernet) which helps me easily setup Cisco wireless AP and IP phones at any office location.
5. RSPAN (Remote Switch Port Analyzer) enables me to monitor network traffic flow with of NMS software.
6. VTP (VLAN Trunking Protocol) helps me to transfer VLAN configuration from one switch to multiple switches.
1. It does not provide any expansion slots so I cannot increase the number of ports.
2. If most of the switch ports get damaged than you have to replace the whole switch.
It is a nice product for enterprises and small businesses. It is a small switch with a lot of features.
We make use of Brocade's BigIron and IBM's Rackswitch in our data center. I would say they are the best; maybe because they are the ones I have experience using. How would you rate Catalyst in comparison two these two products: Rackswitch and BigIron?