Electronic Engineer at eBTel Cia. Ltda.
Reseller
Top 20
Is stable, configurable, durable, and easy to manage
Pros and Cons
  • "Cisco Catalyst Switches is very stable, configurable, and durable. It is also easy to manage."
  • "It would be good if Cisco Catalyst Switches could align maintenance with one version."

What is our primary use case?

My customers are using Cisco Catalyst Switches for communication in different areas in the enterprise. My customers who use this solution are medium sized companies.

What is most valuable?

I think this solution is very good. I manage other solutions, and compared with those, Cisco Catalyst Switches is very stable, configurable, and durable. It is also easy to manage.

This solution is cheaper than other solutions.

What needs improvement?

It would be good if Cisco Catalyst Switches could align maintenance with one version.

Also, the protocols for management should be better.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have about five years of experience with this solution.

Buyer's Guide
Cisco Catalyst Switches
April 2024
Learn what your peers think about Cisco Catalyst Switches. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It is a stable solution.

How are customer service and support?

Technical support is good.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Compared to the price of other solutions such as Huawei and HP, Cisco Catalyst Switches is a cheaper solution.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

My customers have evaluated Huawei and HP.

What other advice do I have?

I recommend Cisco Catalyst Switches and rate it at nine on a scale from one to ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Reseller
PeerSpot user
Network Engeneer at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Performs really well and has great support, we use it everywhere in our company
Pros and Cons
  • "Their technical support is very good. They know what to do and if they don't know what to do, they give me the person who does know."
  • "It should have better security and the prices can always be lower. The cheaper the price, the better but if the quality is good, it's worth it. They also have to improve the firewalling."

What is our primary use case?

We use it everywhere in our company. The switches are in our data center and our stores. It performs really well, it's stable. There are some software issues but it's generally good. 

What is most valuable?

Cisco support is one of the most valuable features. If you have any problem you can find a lot of information online. If it's a really bad situation, you can have a technician help you. 

What needs improvement?

It should have better security and the prices can always be lower. The cheaper the price, the better but if the quality is good, it's worth it. They also have to improve the firewalling. 

SP access should be included in the next release. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Stability is perfect. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Scalability will depend on the specific product. 

How are customer service and technical support?

Their technical support is very good. They know what to do and if they don't know what to do, they give me the person who does know. 

How was the initial setup?

Sometimes we have complex setups and sometimes they're simple. 

What about the implementation team?

We implemented with MTS Austria. They were really great. They know what to do. 

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We also looked at HPE and Juniper. 

What other advice do I have?

Look at the pricing. If you can afford it, buy it. 

I would rate it a nine out of ten. I like it, it works. 

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Cisco Catalyst Switches
April 2024
Learn what your peers think about Cisco Catalyst Switches. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.
PeerSpot user
Founder and Lead Network Consultant at Airowire Networks
Consultant
Supports external flash disks for storing images and file systems
Pros and Cons
  • "A good feature of Cisco Catalyst is that it records crash log files which can be used to literally identify the cause of a crash because there is a lot of information. And Cisco Catalyst supports the use of external flash disks for storing of images and file systems."
  • "Currently, Catalyst is completely proprietary with Cisco. They should have programmability options, through open-source controllers."

What is our primary use case?

I was a Support Engineer with Cisco, I used to support customers who were using Cisco Catalyst features.

What is most valuable?

A good feature of Cisco Catalyst is that it records crash log files which can be used to literally identify the cause of a crash because they have a lot of information. And Cisco Catalyst supports the use of external flash disks for storing of images and file systems.

What needs improvement?

Currently, Catalyst is completely proprietary with Cisco. They should have programmability options, through open-source controllers.

Also, some features, are very complex to configure.

For how long have I used the solution?

More than five years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Catalyst is known for its stability, so there are not many challenges there. Of course, they do have a platform that comes with its own set of bugs, and then the bugs get fixed and then there is a new set of bugs. But it's okay. Compared to other products it is very stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Catalyst is a highly scalable product.

How is customer service and technical support?

Tech support was good in the past but now it is becoming diluted. Cisco used to have a lot of experienced folks, but now their whole process of hiring and training is diluted, so we don't see as much expertise with the TAC engineers as we once did.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Generally, Cisco Catalyst would be relatively expensive compared to the competition, it would be on the expensive side. But I am not involved in the commercial part.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

There are a lot of options when it comes to switching products. Brocade offers good switches, HPE offers a very affordable set of switches. But the purchase decision depends on a lot of factors. Primarily, Cisco provides an end-to-end solution, all aspects of networking, from UIP to security to wireless to servers. That factor plays into it.

What other advice do I have?

I would give this solution an eight out of 10. To get to a 10, it should become more open-source friendly, more customizable, easy to configure, and less complex in terms of the licensing.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
PeerSpot user
Head of Development at a tech vendor
Real User
Network has increased stability, security, and usability
Pros and Cons
  • "If we lose some network connections, the system automatically creates new connections between equipment."
  • "It has the ability to create new services for users, such as IP phones and video conference."
  • "We decreased budgets on the support corporate network and increased user satisfaction."
  • "Needs to improve cloud services and mobile software."

What is our primary use case?

  • Corporate network
  • IP phones
  • Video conference
  • Security
  • Connecting branches with corporate network

How has it helped my organization?

Network has increased stability, security, and usability. Cisco Catalyst has the ability to create new services for users, such as IP phones and video conference. We decreased budgets on the support corporate network and increased user satisfaction.

What is most valuable?

  • Flexible deployment: We can add new network segments without hard work.
  • Stability: If we lose some network connections, the system automatically creates new connections between equipment. 

What needs improvement?

  • Cloud services
  • Machine learning futures
  • Virtual reality futures
  • More IoT equipment
  • Mobile software

For how long have I used the solution?

Three to five years.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
PeerSpot user
Customer Experience Manager at a comms service provider with 501-1,000 employees
Vendor
We now have the ability migrate to multiple sites, but the TAC speed needs improvement.

What is most valuable?

  • Stackable module
  • Hot-swappable inventory

How has it helped my organization?

  • Easier to design and manage a network by enabling reuse
  • Ability migrate to multiple sites

What needs improvement?

Deliverability speed of the Terminal Access Controller.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used it for over four years.

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

No issues encountered.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

No issues encountered.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

There were issues with the maximum stackable switches per site & monitoring setup.

How are customer service and technical support?

Customer Service:

7/10.

Technical Support:

7/10.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We switched because we had weak tech support, especially for the PoE product.

How was the initial setup?

It was a medium difficulty setup.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Licensing is one of the major areas of confusion for a person with a technical if they gain the verification from Cisco website.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We also looked at Dell options.

What other advice do I have?

Ensure you select the right license, power supply and other components to install the switch into the rack.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Network Operations Center Engineer at a tech company with 51-200 employees
Real User
Stable, simple to use, and the technical support is good, but the pricing could be better
Pros and Cons
    • "If they worked on lowering the price, they would be able to attract more customers."

    What is our primary use case?

    This solution is used to strengthen our connections, connect to the network, as a router to multiple systems, network management, and monitoring.

    What is most valuable?

    The configuration is the most valuable feature of this solution.

    It is easy to use.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I have been working with Cisco Catalyst Switches for one year.

    We are working with the 3750 series.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

     The stability of Cisco Catalyst Switches is good.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    It's a scalable product.

    This solution is used by 1,000 customers.

    How are customer service and support?

    Technical support is good.

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    We use Cisco Routers as well as Huawei Routers, and Cisco Linksys.

    How was the initial setup?

    The initial setup was straightforward. 

    The solution took them two and a half years to implement.

    What about the implementation team?

    We have a fiber team that handles solution maintenance and helps us with some technical issues.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    The cost could be reduced.

    If they worked on lowering the price, they would be able to attract more customers.

    We are consultants who provide licensing to our clients.

    What other advice do I have?

    When I graduate, I will have improved my English and will be able to perform more tasks.

    I am in charge of the data while learning how to deploy this solution.

    I would rate Cisco Catalyst Switches a seven out of ten.

    Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

    On-premises
    Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
    PeerSpot user
    Information Security Analyst at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
    Real User
    The SmartPort feature has been valuable and helped my organization
    Pros and Cons
    • "We heavily use the SmartPort features. It has really helped us. The U.S. policies are handled by the auto SmartPort feature"
    • "They should make so that they let users know five to ten minutes before productivity is restored in the case of power loss."

    What is our primary use case?

    We use this solution for provisioning.

    How has it helped my organization?

    We heavily use the SmartPort features. It has really helped us. The U.S. policies are handled by the auto SmartPort feature.

    What is most valuable?

    It's easy to use and easy to configure. It's easy to provision and plan ahead. 

    What needs improvement?

    They should make so that they let users know five to ten minutes before productivity is restored in the case of power loss. 

    For how long have I used the solution?

    One to three years.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    It's very stable. 

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    It is highly scalable. We have 120 users. It has high capabilities. We only require six or seven people for the maintenance. Cisco has guidelines for the maintenance that are straightforward. 

    How are customer service and technical support?

    If I ask for any support, they're responsive. Their support is very good. We haven't had any problems.

    How was the initial setup?

    The initial setup was very easy, not complex at all. 

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    It's very pricey. Compared to competitors, it's a lot more expensive. They should consider lowering the price for smaller organizations so that it's easier for them to afford. 

    What other advice do I have?

    I would rate it an eight and a half out of ten. 

    They should develop more customization features. It would make things easier for the engineers. 

    Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
    PeerSpot user
    it_user5274 - PeerSpot reviewer
    Network Manager at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees
    Vendor
    Small switch with a lot of features - good for enterprises and small businesses

    Valuable Features:

    1. Cisco 2960 catalysts switch has lots of security features (Port Security, block DHCP snooping, VLAN).
    2. I can create a stack with multiple Cisco 2960 switch which improve availability
    3. I can create a port channel by merging multiple port of multiple switches which help me transfer large amounts of data traffic between serveres and it also increases reliability if one switch port becomes damaged.
    4. It provides PoE (Power over Ethernet) which helps me easily setup Cisco wireless AP and IP phones at any office location.
    5. RSPAN (Remote Switch Port Analyzer) enables me to monitor network traffic flow with of NMS software.
    6. VTP (VLAN Trunking Protocol) helps me to transfer VLAN configuration from one switch to multiple switches.

    Room for Improvement:

    1. It does not provide any expansion slots so I cannot increase the number of ports.
    2. If most of the switch ports get damaged than you have to replace the whole switch.

    Other Advice:

    It is a nice product for enterprises and small businesses. It is a small switch with a lot of features.

    Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
    PeerSpot user
    it_user1068 - PeerSpot reviewer
    it_user1068Tech Support Staff at a tech company with 51-200 employees
    Vendor

    We make use of Brocade's BigIron and IBM's Rackswitch in our data center. I would say they are the best; maybe because they are the ones I have experience using. How would you rate Catalyst in comparison two these two products: Rackswitch and BigIron?

    Buyer's Guide
    Download our free Cisco Catalyst Switches Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
    Updated: April 2024
    Buyer's Guide
    Download our free Cisco Catalyst Switches Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.