Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Network and Security Manager at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
It has reduced our day-to-day operations by at least half
Pros and Cons
  • "It has reduced our day-to-day operations by at least half."
  • "The user interface should be made easier."

What is our primary use case?

Our primary use case is Multi-site architecture. We run three data centers with Cisco ACI Multi-site, so the interconnections of these three sites are made with ACI.

How has it helped my organization?

It has reduced our day-to-day operations by at least half.

What is most valuable?

  • Its simplicity
  • It can be automated.

What needs improvement?

The user interface (UI) should be made easier.

I would like to have a multi-cloud environment, but I just read that Cisco ACI Anywhere is about to be released.

Buyer's Guide
Cisco ACI
June 2025
Learn what your peers think about Cisco ACI. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: June 2025.
857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

At the moment, the stability is very good. A year and a half ago, sometimes things went wrong with it.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We chose Cisco ACI because of its scalability.

How are customer service and support?

Their technical support is as good as their other products.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We were looking for an automated solution and decided to build from scratch with Cisco ACI.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was straightforward. 

What about the implementation team?

We used Maticmind, which is an Italian system integrator and Cisco partner. They are very good.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We chose ACI because we have worked with Cisco for a long time and felt that there was no reason to change at the time.

What other advice do I have?

It is a great product. We have not encountered any problems so far. Cisco is very good to work with, and I am really happy with this product.

I would advise to go with Cisco ACI.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Platformbd19 - PeerSpot reviewer
Platform Engineer at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
You can push scripts that you are writing now to set up connections in less than five to ten minutes
Pros and Cons
  • "With its programmability, you can do stuff to policies to make them more flexible, allowing you to connect devices in new ways."
  • "I would like them to simplify the way you configure the Fabric. The process is quite complex. This can be a barrier to entry. For anything, where it should take two or three steps, you have ten steps"

What is our primary use case?

We use Cisco ACI within our four data centers, and it has been deployed in all four. They are the backbone within our data centers.

How has it helped my organization?

We have an old switches and catalysts. This product makes things easier. Once everything is on Fabric, their routes are bounced around within the Fabric, so you don't have to configure new switchboards or parts. It does makes it that much easier.

What is most valuable?

Its programmability: You can do stuff to policies to make them more flexible, allowing you to connect devices in new ways. 

What needs improvement?

I would like Cisco to simplify the interaction of the controller. 

I would also like them to simplify the way you configure the Fabric. The process is quite complex. This can be a barrier to entry. For anything, where it should take two or three steps, you have ten steps.

It took quite a bit of time to learn how to use it. The learning curve is very steep.

For how long have I used the solution?

Less than one year.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Since I joined, we have had about two or three outages. Sometimes the controller to the device interaction can be problematic, but otherwise, it has been quite stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It is very scalable and easy to add new devices on, which is very good.

How is customer service and technical support?

It is possible because we have a contract with them, they are always available. Whenever I have had to talk to them, they are very responsive. When issues have happened, there have been about four or five issues, they were able to have them solved within a day or two.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was complex since these are brand new data centers. The topology for the network was different in the way it was set up.

What about the implementation team?

Cisco did the integration. They are still adding new things and deploying. They are doing a very good job.

What was our ROI?

You can push scripts that you are writing now to set up connections in less than five to ten minutes.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We also evaluated IBM.

With the Cisco ACI technology, the programmability enables interaction. The other solutions are not really built for programmability. They don't interact with their databases directly, where Cisco ACI makes this possible. This is one of the many reasons that our organization selected it.

What other advice do I have?

It is a fantastic product, but train up first. In the first six months before you deploy, if you can get your hands on a demo and attend some classes or do some studies, get yourself to a place of being competent before you start.

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Cisco ACI
June 2025
Learn what your peers think about Cisco ACI. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: June 2025.
857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
PeerSpot user
Security Advisor at https://globalqart,com
Real User
Top 20
The ACI fabric enables any service (physical or virtual) anywhere with no need for additional software or hardware gateways

What is our primary use case?

  • Qatar Rail: network and data center infrastructure
  • Msheireb Downtown: smart city project including infrastructure for Big Data
  • Ministry of Interior: network design based on Qatar Rail's passive infrastructure.

How has it helped my organization?

ACI provides network ability to deploy and respond to the needs of applications, both in the data center and in the cloud.

What is most valuable?

The ACI fabric supports more than 64,000 dedicated tenant networks. A single fabric can support more than one million IPv4/IPv6 endpoints, more than 64,000 tenants, and more than 200,000 10G ports. 

The ACI fabric enables any service (physical or virtual) anywhere with no need for additional software or hardware gateways to connect between the physical and virtual services and normalizes encapsulations for virtual extensible local area network (VXLAN)/VLAN/network virtualization using generic routing encapsulation (NVGRE).

What needs improvement?

  • Security and isolation based on the type of traffic
  • High level of resiliency.

For how long have I used the solution?

Three to five years.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
it_user302127 - PeerSpot reviewer
Network Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
The controller automatically detects new additions and scales itself, but it needs a better connection between infrastructure and logic.

Valuable Features

It's fully-integrated into vCenter, so we can see everything, like vMotion, and can manage fully with vCenter, as well as manage the whole network.

Improvements to My Organization

  • It's essential for a software defined network.
  • Automated systems
  • Helps to defend policies that we've created
  • Good for automation

Room for Improvement

It's very new, so there's lots of bugs, and it's only good for testing with PoC customers. We're the first Canadian customers for this product.

Infrastructure and logic should have a better connection. There's too much linkage and it's easy for people to get lost.

Deployment Issues

No issues with deployment.

Stability Issues

Again, it has lots of bugs as we're the first Canadian company for which it's been used.

Scalability Issues

The scalability is very good, as the controller automatically detects new additions and scales itself. It's agile because it's a cloud-based network.

Customer Service and Technical Support

We've used it a lot, and someone is always available because our employer is the first customer in Canada.

Initial Setup

It's complex, and you must go through training.

Other Advice

Look to similar products depending on your budget. Remember, this is in the early stages, so it's still evolving. Be sure to get training for implementation and deployment.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
it_user234747 - PeerSpot reviewer
Practice Manager - Cloud, Automation & DevOps at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Real User
It offers third party integration via OpFlex however, you can only use the Nexus 9000 series hardware for the ACI fabric.

Originally posted at vcdx133.com.

I recently completed the Cisco ACI Field Engineering course. This post describes the major building blocks of the Cisco Application Centric Infrastructure (ACI) and how it all fits together.

Cisco ACI is the next generation of Data Center flexible network fabrics, it replaces what you currently have with Nexus 2K, 5K and 7K (traditional Core, Distribution, Access or FabricPath architecture). Cisco’s previous TRILL-based leaf and spine technology is FabricPath, which has nothing to do with ACI (based upon VXLAN). The two are not compatible and unrelated, aside from supporting the Clos-type architecture.

Cisco ACI is designed to provide a unified fabric for physical and virtual networking, moving away from the management of individual physical switches. If you are used to the policy construction of the Cisco UCS, then you will easily understand Cisco ACI.

The Cisco Application Centric Infrastructure (ACI) has the following major components:

  • Clos-type Leaf and Spine architecture with VXLAN ECMP
  • Application Policy Infrastructure Controller (APIC) – minimum of three per fabric. The APIC has a UI but is really designed for northbound REST API integration with a Cloud Management Platform that will push policy into the ACI fabric.
  • 3rd party integration via OpFlex (open policy protocol supporting XML and JSON)
  • Nexus 9000 Product Family – 9500 series & 9300 series
  • Spine Switches – Nexus 9336 fixed chassis (“baby spine”) or 9736 line card with the 95xx chassis
  • Application Virtual Switch (AVS) – replaces the Nexus 1000V and allows APIC policy to be pushed to the vSwitch

The diagram below illustrates the Cisco ACI Leaf and Spine architecture, complete with APIC management nodes.

Cisco ACI is driven via policy and the main policy groups are:

  • APIC Controllers
  • Fabric, Access & Inventory
  • Tenants
  • VM Domains
  • Layer 4 to Layer 7 Services
  • AAA & Security


Weaknesses (Cisco APIC version 1.0)

  • Can only use the Nexus 9000 series hardware for the ACI fabric. There is talk of other Nexus models and other vendors being supported in the future.
  • Only a small number of vendors support OpFlex at this point in time (eg. F5, Citrix).
  • Cisco ACI was released in 2014, it will take some time for it to gain maturity.
  • Currently does not have the concept of Micro-segmentation as a service of the hypervisor (like VMware NSX-v does).
  • ACI Fabric “Federation” (unifying multiple ACI fabrics into one) is not currently supported.
  • Single vCenter to multiple ACI fabrics is currently not supported (technically possible, but is an unsupported configuration).
  • Operationally complex without a Cloud Management Platform to push policy, which is true for any network virtualisation solution.
  • Current supported CMPs are OpenStack and Cisco UCS Director.
  • QoS enforcement within the ACI fabric is currently not supported.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user