Check Point CloudGuard WAF Reviews

The solution's strongest point is that you can connect everything to it, giving you a full view of what's connected. If you configure it right, it works perfectly.

You need to know exactly the system. You cannot have someone running the system if they don't have the knowledge to do so.

I've been working with the solution for about a year.

The solution is stable. It doesn't matter which device is running Check Point. The solution works. It has never gone down. I rate the solution's stability a ten out of ten.

My clients are large, but they are not enterprise-sized or small.

I rate the initial setup a five out of ten because it is easy if you have the required knowledge and difficult if you are new to the system. The challenge isn't installing it: "Next, next, next, finish." Even a less knowledgeable person can do that. The challenge is configuring the system. There are a lot of blades in CloudGuard. You need to keep each type of security in your view, except for the Check Point view.

The initial setup is very fast, but you need to pray that the solution does all the work itself.

Other unified platforms like QRadar and Cisco are comparatively easier to use.

You need someone knowledgeable to run the system. Today, with all the technology and everything, the company just wants to buy control and be lazy. "Let Check Point do the work." But this does not happen with Check Point because you need professional eyes. Check Point's price is very low compared to those controlling the system. You have to learn to investigate the solution to work better with it. The knowledge costs more than the system. The solution has a hybrid deployment, and I don't know a company that only chooses one deployment or another.

There is no support available for Check Point. There are things you have to look for, and that's it.

Check Point is the world's first and probably best security company. They might change its face, give it new names, separate into new models, and so on, but in the end, they are the best security company in the world. I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

We require the use of a solid security tool for our websites provisioned in Microsoft Azure App Service, which is used for internal use by the company and for external use by the client.

The key requirements that we needed to solve were to have automated protection, to have little administration in addition to providing few false positives, all this was successfully solved or provided through CloudGuard Application Security, in addition to the fact that we were able to centralize everything in the whole family. 

Thanks to the centralized use of Check Point CloudGuard App Security we managed to have protection for our Windows and Linux sites, in addition to having little interaction with exceptions due to having this tool in prevention mode.

This tool does not require a lot of learning time, it is incredible. With other tools, adaptation time is required, which with Check Point is not necessary.

We have also been able to find a sensible implementation of the application, providing confidence and business peace of mind.

Check Point CloudGuard Application Security offers us many virtues, the ones we liked the most were:

• Easy and simple implementation from the Check Point Infinity portal

• Very few false positives, which generates a lot of confidence in the product

• The portal is quite intuitive

• The solution does not require much time to adapt to the sites and applications it protects.

In itself, the application really meets our expectations. At the management level, the solution is what was needed to protect this area of the company's infrastructure.

This Check Point solution is an extremely complete security solution, it is really amazing. However, there are always improvements that can be made to all of the tools.

We would like the solution to be more economical since it is not accessible to all clients or is a point of consideration.

Regarding the documentation, starting implementation was not so clear. We had to validate several guides until we could do it correctly.

Finally, we would like the Infinity portal perform better.

During this last year we have been adding the use of CloudGuard checkpoint for the protection of our infrastructure in Microsoft Azure.

It is a cloud solution, managed by Check Point. So far we have not had performance problems.

We previously tested Microsoft Azure Application Gateway with the WAF feature. However, two points led us to switch to Check Point:

1- We wanted a centralized security environment. We already have Check Point solutions based on the infinity checkpoint portal.

2- The WAF solution required more time in detection mode.

Costs are an important issue to discuss with the partner. Validate the documentation and its scope to validate if they meet corporate requirements.

We always evaluate the solutions in the market to make the best decision.

The importance and use of this product were required to improve new application deployments made in the Microsoft Azure cloud. They were not one hundred percent secure, however with this CloudGuard application security from Check Point has managed to improve all these requirements to obtain greater security.

The applications are generally internal to the company, however, they are secure thanks to Check Point CloudGuard.                                   

Check Point CloudGuard Application Security is a cloud-based security solution designed to protect web applications and APIs from various types of cyber threats.

This tool has managed to improve security considerably in our apps and the APIs created for the company. We have not presented problems, threats, or leaks even when some are exposed to the Internet and are more susceptible to attacks. The company is now more secure, thanks to Check Point.                                             

The solution is created one hundred percent on the cloud; the portal is easy to manage.

The solution offers continuous security monitoring and alerting, which can help organizations detect and respond to security incidents in real time.

CloudGuard Application Security provides comprehensive visibility into web applications and API traffic

The solution offers support for compliance regulations such as PCI-DSS, HIPAA, and GDPR, helping organizations to meet their regulatory obligations.

One of the big problems we found in Check Point, in general, is the support. It is always attended very late or they take a long time to answer.

The cost of this tool is extremely high, which is why it must be analyzed before implementing it.

The support language is only English. This causes some problems in Spanish-speaking countries. They could expand the languages offered to help the client.

This excellent security tool, Check Point CloudGuard, has multi-cloud security and is also perfect for secure developments. It's been used in recent years by the company.

Previously we did not use a technology like this.

We always carry out tests and validations before acquiring a solution.

We have had the need to ensure the development of each of our applications based on the fact that the applications must be safe, fast, and efficient. We want to prevent an injection of a vulnerability attack by broken authentication, exposure of confidential data, or external entities that can inject us with xml services via broken access control. All these characteristics cause insecurity. We have looked for solutions that can guide us and establish a safe and concise baseline.

It has given us greater security at an organizational level. It has allowed us to use components with known vulnerabilities, which have been prevented based on their multiple databases that have correlated incidents, helping the development of applications to be fast, efficient, and safe, which is what we were looking for. Thus giving us the possibility to register, monitor, and identify technological insufficiencies or absent capacities in the development of the application.

Its most outstanding feature is the registry and the possibility of monitoring everything. When it comes to simplifying or establishing an error, an infraction, or a detection due to a breach of unauthorized access, it gives us an overview of each one of the capabilities and a segmented control over the development. It offers good functionality of the application that is currently running. It's giving us the ability to test based on vulnerable interfaces, and anomalous requests and responses. All these types of characteristics give us a reference point as to whether they are secure or insecure. We get logging monitoring and general visibility of the application.

The application allows us to have control over its activities, the management, and the interconnection of monitoring which takes advantage of computing power, is exceptional. That said, I would like to be able to integrate the theme of Artificial Intelligence to help review issues and to monitor and view the security issue while also suggesting and interpreting and additionally configuring solutions - basically, acting as an interpreter.

We've used the solution for about six or seven months. That was when established applications at the cloud level.

With CloudGuard WAF, I can deploy a cloud-based network protection solution that secures my applications, endpoints, and data.

The features I have found most valuable are the comprehensive threat prevention capabilities, automated policy management, and seamless integration with cloud environments.

For the next release, I would suggest considering features like enhanced threat intelligence integration.

I have been using Check Point CloudGuard WAF for about two years.

The stability of the product has been good so far.

Check Point's technical support is helpful and knowledgeable overall, but there can be delays in response, especially regarding licensing issues.

The main reasons I chose this vendor for web application security were their ability to consolidate management facilities, their comprehensive features, and their flexibility in addressing different security needs.

We have seen ROI from using CloudGuard WAF.

I believe that the pricing or licensing of CloudGuard WAF could be more competitive.

Implementing CloudGuard WAF allowed me to address the challenges of securing my applications and data in a rapidly evolving cloud environment.

Using CloudGuard WAF has brought significant benefits, including improved threat protection, streamlined policy management, and enhanced usability. I noticed these advantages shortly after the first deployment.

It is extremely important to me that CloudGuard optimizes security to protect my applications without solely relying on signatures.

To access the false positive rate, I typically review assessment reports available on platforms like AWS or Azure. By evaluating how effectively the solution preemptively blocks zero-day attacks and minimizes false positives, I can reduce the total cost of ownership for my web application security.

The solution's privacy features, user-friendly web console, virtual deployment options, and physical appliance capabilities have all contributed to reducing my total cost of ownership.

Overall, I would rate CloudGuard WAF as an eight out of ten.

I use the solution for securing web applications. 

The tool's most valuable feature is AI, which makes operations easier. Moreover, it is easy to deploy. 

Securing web applications with Check Point CloudGuard Application Security is easy. The setup and configuration are easy compared to alternatives. It stands out for its simplicity. It does not rely on signatures, one of its unique features. 

The solution helps to reduce TCO. It minimizes the pressure. 

I have encountered issues with Check Point CloudGuard Application Security's technical support. It also has missing configuration features. 

Check Point CloudGuard Application Security's deployment is easy. 

Check Point CloudGuard Application Security's pricing is comparable to other products in the market. 

The tool protects newer applications. It isn't very good when dealing with both applications. However, it is expected. I rate the overall product a seven out of ten.