The solution helps to protect our customers at the perimeter. We have integrated the solution into our NSX environment.
Lead Security Analyst at BH Telecom
Comes with threat prevention, HTTPS inspection, and the Anti-Bot blade features
Pros and Cons
- "The tool's most valuable features for us are threat prevention, HTTPS inspection, and the Anti-Bot blade. Threat prevention helps to protect our assets from threats. HTTPS inspection ensures secure communication, and the Anti-Bot blade is particularly helpful in detecting C2 servers, enhancing our ability to identify malicious activities and protect our network."
- "CloudGuard Network Security needs to include new features. One specific feature I would like to see is the ability to protect external resources using single sign-on integration with various identity providers, including custom identity providers. Its pricing could also be cheaper."
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
The tool's most valuable features for us are threat prevention, HTTPS inspection, and the Anti-Bot blade. Threat prevention helps to protect our assets from threats. HTTPS inspection ensures secure communication, and the Anti-Bot blade is particularly helpful in detecting C2 servers, enhancing our ability to identify malicious activities and protect our network.
We can confidently assert that we are among the top cloud providers, protecting our customers from external threats. With Check Point's CloudGuard Network Security, we offer attack services protection.
What needs improvement?
CloudGuard Network Security needs to include new features. One specific feature I would like to see is the ability to protect external resources using single sign-on integration with various identity providers, including custom identity providers. Its pricing could also be cheaper.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using the product for six years.
Buyer's Guide
Check Point Cloud Firewall (formerly CloudGuard Network Security)
April 2026
Learn what your peers think about Check Point Cloud Firewall (formerly CloudGuard Network Security). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2026.
886,664 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
CloudGuard Network Security is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
CloudGuard Network Security is highly scalable in our virtual environment. We can easily add more ports, and it functions perfectly. We use it in cluster mode, deploying multiple Check Point clusters horizontally and vertically, making scalability easy and excellent.
How are customer service and support?
I find Check Point's technical support to be excellent. We have premium support, and whenever we open a case, especially for high-severity issues, we receive a phone call from their support team.
How was the initial setup?
CloudGuard Network Security's deployment is straightforward.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The product is expensive but also valuable.
What other advice do I have?
CloudGuard Network Security provides unified security management across hybrid clouds as well as on-premises environments. It helps to manage everything from a single point.
I have been exploring Harmony SASE for remote security and zero-trust access in some proof-of-concept activities. Also, I'm checking out the CloudGuard Web Application Firewall for safeguarding our applications on the internet.
I rate the product a ten out of ten. We have had a great experience with Check Point, and we haven't faced any major incidents or attacks compromising our organization. It has helped us detect activities on our endpoints.
I would genuinely recommend it. Check Point is easy to manage, implement, and configure. The support is excellent, and the constant threat intelligence updates ensure protection against various threats. It's truly an amazing product for securing your environment.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
System Engineer at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees
Helps to manage cloud traffic locally without routing it through data centers
Pros and Cons
- "I like the tool's ability to manage cloud traffic locally without routing it through our data centers."
- "The product needs to improve technical support."
What is most valuable?
I like the tool's ability to manage cloud traffic locally without routing it through our data centers.
What needs improvement?
The product needs to improve technical support.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using the product for four years.
How are customer service and support?
The tool's support has been excellent. We can maintain our Check Point Firewalls effectively, both on-premises and in the cloud.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The tool's monthly costs have undergone a significant reduction, dropping from approximately 12,000 euros to around 4,000. This represents a cost reduction of over 60 percent. However, it's essential to note that while costs decreased in some areas, they increased in others due to shifts in our environment. As our overall environment has grown, currently connecting 50 accounts to the cloud, it's challenging to directly compare costs with the state of our setup three years ago.
What other advice do I have?
Initially, we faced some challenges, especially with the AWS transit gateway, involving manual routing configurations and complex setup tasks. I rate the overall product a nine out of ten.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Buyer's Guide
Check Point Cloud Firewall (formerly CloudGuard Network Security)
April 2026
Learn what your peers think about Check Point Cloud Firewall (formerly CloudGuard Network Security). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2026.
886,664 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Platform Lead at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
Dynamic and scalable but improvement is needed in integration feature
Pros and Cons
- "The Identity Awareness blade and dynamic tagging in Azure are valuable because they make access management automatic. Instead of manually setting up access for each new resource, it happens automatically based on the same access policy. This dynamic setup is scalable."
- "Regarding CloudGuard Network Security's integration with various resources like application gateways and application-based security groups, there's room for exploring dynamic access in those areas. A significant concern is the upgrade process. Unlike an in-place upgrade, upgrading the tool in Azure requires deploying a new resource, which can be hectic and less reliable. We have to spend something new to have the tool's latest version."
What is our primary use case?
For the Azure platform, especially Azure endpoint protections and other network aspects, we utilize CloudGuard Network Security to secure the egress connection. This includes configuring and maintaining express route connectivity between on-premises and Azure.
What is most valuable?
The Identity Awareness blade and dynamic tagging in Azure are valuable because they make access management automatic. Instead of manually setting up access for each new resource, it happens automatically based on the same access policy. This dynamic setup is scalable.
The tool is cloud-based and scalable. As our resources scale up or down, the system automatically adapts. This reduces the need for manual work, allowing us to manage the entire cloud infrastructure with a smaller workforce. It helps with automation.
What needs improvement?
Regarding CloudGuard Network Security's integration with various resources like application gateways and application-based security groups, there's room for exploring dynamic access in those areas. A significant concern is the upgrade process. Unlike an in-place upgrade, upgrading the tool in Azure requires deploying a new resource, which can be hectic and less reliable. We have to spend something new to have the tool's latest version.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using the product for four years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Stability is generally good, and I don't have many complaints due to its scalability. When there are hardware issues, it automatically sets up a new, healthy instance. Overall, it contributes to a stable environment for us.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution's scalability is excellent, but we do encounter some restrictions with the API on the cloud platform. This occasionally causes issues with the frequent pulling up of new resources.
How was the initial setup?
Our deployment model involves VM scale sets. We have set up instances across three environments: production, staging, and development. This structure allows for easy testing in the development environment before moving on to the production environment. We utilize Check Point's professional services to integrate, deploy, and build a cloud platform for CloudGuard Network Security.
What was our ROI?
We have seen a return on investment from CloudGuard Network Security. As more workloads shift from on-premises to the product, the costs associated with on-premises infrastructure decrease. Additionally, its dynamic and scalable nature in Azure allows us to maintain control.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The solution's licensing is based on the number of users of the VMs. We follow a pay-as-you-go model. Its pricing is competitive.
What other advice do I have?
CloudGuard Network Security can manage security for both our hybrid cloud and on-premises systems. Currently, we have separate solutions for on-premises and the cloud. We also use Smart-1 Cloud from the Infinity portal. We haven't integrated the tool with both Azure and on-prem environments.
I have about an eight out of ten confidence level in our cloud network security with the product. It is because of Azurre's robust and dynamic nature. It is easy to incorporate anything new that comes up. We can integrate any new steps in Azure concerning the blades, CloudGuard Network Security, and Check Point.
Cloud-native firewalls lack functionalities such as IPS, which are exclusive to products like Check Point or other vendor-specific solutions. This is why we opted for CloudGuard Network Security as an additional layer, complementing the limitations of Azure's native or any cloud-native firewalls.
We are already using Check Point for our on-prem environment. The cloud solution was easy to integrate with our existing infrastructure.
I rate the overall product a six out of ten. Due to certain limitations in the integration between Azure and CloudGuard Network Security, I currently rate the experience as a six. However, I'm hopeful that Check Point is working on its new release.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Senior Manager ICT & Innovations at Bangalore International Airport Limited
Comes with analytic reports but needs improvement in support
Pros and Cons
- "The product gives analytic reports."
- "Check Point CloudGuard Network Security should give productive reports as per business requirements. It needs to improve support since the time-limit extended beyond a day. It should include more seamless API integrations."
What is our primary use case?
Check Point CloudGuard Network Security helps to ensure the security and protection of IT systems. We have many API integrations and want to ensure its protection.
What is most valuable?
The product gives analytic reports.
What needs improvement?
Check Point CloudGuard Network Security should give productive reports as per business requirements. It needs to improve support since the time-limit extended beyond a day. It should include more seamless API integrations.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using the product for four years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The product's stability is good.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Check Point CloudGuard Network Security is very much scalable. My company has 1000 users.
How was the initial setup?
Check Point CloudGuard Network Security's deployment is easy and takes one day to complete. You need four resources to handle it.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The product's licensing costs are yearly.
What other advice do I have?
I rate the product an eight out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Hybrid Cloud
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Cloud Network Engineer at a insurance company with 5,001-10,000 employees
An easy-to-navigate tool useful for filtering internet traffic that needs to improve its deployment speed
Pros and Cons
- "It is a good-to-use tool that is also flexible."
- "The deployment phase takes too much time."
What is our primary use case?
In my company, we use the solution just to secure my AWS Network Insights and inside production. We use it for security purposes.
What is most valuable?
With the solution, we just need to filter the traffic coming from the internet and Direct Connect. So it filters the traffic, basically. It permits access. In short, it just filters the traffic and permits the traffic. The aforementioned details are the purposes for which we use the tool.
What needs improvement?
We use the tool as a basic firewall. It's a technical firewall. As a technical firewall, we use SmartConsole or Check Point Firewall.
The deployment phase takes too much time. I would like the deployment to be faster.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Check Point CloudGuard Network Security for two and a half years. We are using Check Point R80.10 SmartConsole in our organization.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Stability-wise, I rate the solution a seven out of ten since it takes too much time for deployment. However, it is flexible since we used to push the policy normally. It takes hardly ten seconds to install the policy. It's much easier.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I have been using the solution in my company for the last year. Other than the employees in my company, more than 25,000 users are using the solution hosted on AWS.
Basically, the application, which is hosted, is used internally. It's the same user account because it's not exposed anywhere on the internet. If anyone wants to access the solution from the internet, the traffic comes from Direct Connect, and from Direct Connect, it goes to AWS.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was not much complex. The setup phase was good enough to be able to navigate through it.
It took a long time to deploy it. We need to run this on EC2 instances, so it took almost two hours to deploy the solution. After deploying the solution slowly, and gradually, we have to push the policy on the firewall. It takes time to deploy, but it's a stable one.
The solution is deployed on the cloud. It's a software we install in EC2 instances on AWS, which we use as a firewall.
We currently have six to seven resources managing the deployments and maintenance.
What about the implementation team?
During deployment, we took technical help from Check Point.
What other advice do I have?
It is a good-to-use tool that is also flexible.
Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
ICT Officer at Kenyatta National Hospital
Secure, highly stable, and helpful support
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable feature of Check Point CloudGuard Network Security is the increased mail protection including spam."
- "The solution has improved our company because our Office 365 solution is secure, and most of our Microsoft solutions are now more secure than before when they had spyware and malware, and we no longer have these problems as before."
- "The price of the solution could be reduced, it is expensive."
- "The price of Check Point CloudGuard Network Security is very high compared to other solutions, such as Fortinet FortiMail."
What is our primary use case?
We are using Check Point CloudGuard Network Security for protecting our Office 365 mail.
How has it helped my organization?
The solution has improved our company because our Office 365 solution is secure. Most of our Microsoft solutions are now more secure than before when they had spyware and malware. We no longer have these problems as before.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature of Check Point CloudGuard Network Security is the increased mail protection including spam.
What needs improvement?
The price of the solution could be reduced, it is expensive.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Check Point CloudGuard Network Security for approximately one year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Check Point CloudGuard Network Security is very stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Check Point CloudGuard Network Security can scale but it will cost you more.
We have approximately 2,000 mailboxes using this solution.
How are customer service and support?
The technical support from Check Point CloudGuard Network Security is very good.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We did not use another solution prior to Check Point CloudGuard Network Security.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup of Check Point CloudGuard Network Security is not difficult, it was simple. However, someone else might have difficulties. The whole implementation took approximately one day.
What about the implementation team?
We had the Check Point CloudGuard Network Security team help us remotely with the implementation.
We have a service level agreement with some vendors for the maintenance, but we rarely call them, because we handle it mostly in-house.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The price of Check Point CloudGuard Network Security is very high compared to other solutions, such as Fortinet FortiMail. For the over 2,000 mailboxes we use with the solution it is very expensive.
Here in Kenya, the cost of Check Point CloudGuard Network Security is approximately $160,000.
I rate the price of Check Point CloudGuard Network Security a three out of ten.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We evaluated Fortinet and Barracuda, but Check Point CloudGuard Network Security was better. I found it uses very few resources.
What other advice do I have?
This is a good solution, but they have to be ready to pay the high costs.
I rate Check Point CloudGuard Network Security an eight out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Senior Manager at Advertising Standards Council of India
Cost-effective with good productivity and 100% proactive detection
Pros and Cons
- "It is dynamic and agile, and its features and utilities continuously improve and evolve."
- "Check Point CloudGuard Network Security is the best security software for protecting IT systems inside out."
- "The business and product development team should introduce a high-end feedback collection mechanism and analyze the customer requirements constructively."
- "The business and product development team should introduce a high-end feedback collection mechanism and analyze the customer requirements constructively."
What is our primary use case?
Check Point CloudGuard Network Security is the best security software for protecting IT systems inside out. There is no compromise with system security if the CloudGuard Network solution is intact. It provides threat prevention and protection from malware and enables system and server security up to 100%.
We have numerous API integration of our internal IT systems with outside servers and network systems, where security lapses are a huge concern. CloudGuard helped in providing complete security and protected entry of threat entrants in our system from outside servers.
How has it helped my organization?
CloudGuard Network Security has enabled the security system to operate safely without any trouble. It has resulted in saving on huge expenses for organizations as it's a cost-effective and cheap alternative compared to its market competitors. It brings a secure IT environment for a workforce, which leads to boosting productivity and an increased revenue stream for the organization. This leads to increased productivity and prosperity.
Also, it's the one-stop solution for preventing systems from security threats and all kinds of endpoints in the IT space.
What is most valuable?
There are no security lapses and 100% restriction of threat entrants in the system or server.
It's a cost-effective solution with no false positive cases.
The product helps in bringing productivity and enhanced customer experience for users.
We have a happy workforce and more workforce retention and increased IT environment sustainability.
There is 100% proactive detection of root causes and root sources.
It is dynamic and agile, and its features and utilities continuously improve and evolve.
It's the best-unified endpoint management solution for IT systems globally. The product is available for all kinds of business users.
What needs improvement?
We really believe in ongoing improvements for emerging business needs. The business and product development team should introduce a high-end feedback collection mechanism and analyze the customer requirements constructively.
The feedback mechanism is best to understand the user and market needs. All kinds and sizes of businesses should be approached to provide feedback so that unanimous decisions and unbiased reviews/feedback can be collected.
Also, more customized strategic pricing can be involved and introduced so that more and more businesses can be attracted for trial and usage of the software.
For how long have I used the solution?
We've used the solution for almost a year now.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The product offers amazing stability and we had no discomfort or hassle in the setup.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution is scalable and attractive.
How are customer service and support?
The solution has strong customer support and agile service experience.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We use McAfee solutions earlier due to the company and parent organization's long-term association with McAfee.
After subsequent years of usage, we felt a dire need of usage of advanced security solutions. After receiving continuous good feedback from peer organizations, we landed at Check Point.
It's been a great experience so far.
How was the initial setup?
The setup is effortless and not complicated at all.
What about the implementation team?
We implemented the solution through vendor team management.
What was our ROI?
We've seen an ROI of 80% to 85%.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
In my book, Check Point comes as quite a handy and cost-effective alternative for the security enablement of IT systems. It's cheap and easy for deployment and is the best solution so far. Its signing of SLA and maintaining long-term key association and collaboration with service partners is really effortless and easy. We've had a highly professional partner experience.
Licensing is usually annual.
Setup and deployment costs are offered with discounts that are attractive and sustainable.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We analyzed and did trials for Cisco Secure Firewall and other security solutions like Trend Micro, etc.
What other advice do I have?
I would strongly recommend everyone to go for a trial of this security solution ASAP. It is one of the best experiences ever.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Private Cloud
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Consultant at ITQS
Easy to manage and implement with simple configuration capabilities
Pros and Cons
- "One of the main characteristics that Check Point CloudGuard Network Security has given us is granularity and visibility."
- "It is somewhat problematic in the area of the cloud."
What is our primary use case?
Check Point CloudGuard Network Security helps resolve potential regulatory and compliance issues when moving to the cloud. The high-visibility rule base's granular approach helps us with potential security leaks and highlights items to focus on for immediate action.
The functionality that we're using it for is the cloud firewall piece.
For this reason, it was necessary to implement this tool in our organization and the results have been very positive, providing the necessary security throughout the infrastructure.
How has it helped my organization?
One of the main characteristics that Check Point CloudGuard Network Security has given us is granularity and visibility. The data that enters our Azure environment integrates in a great way in the cloud and in on-premises. This is important for the alerts and the response to incidents that arise in our platform in the cloud, for the moment, we are very satisfied to have acquired this solution and to have implemented it in the cloud and with other systems on-premise that have given us a lot of security and peace of mind.
What is most valuable?
One of the features that I liked the most and that I feel is very useful is auto-scaling. Our Azure cloud environment is constantly growing and this allows us to expand as well.
Another very accurate feature is CloudGuard's malware prevention and exploit resistance rate and they have given us a lot of security since the database is very large.
It is easy to manage CloudGuard from on-premises and offers the same protection as we can provide to the rest of our environments, which is a great advantage for us.
What needs improvement?
One of the areas that should be improved is the updates of the products. It is somewhat problematic in the area of the cloud. In the case of migration from on-premise to the cloud, it is difficult to replace the licenses. It should be something very transparent and thus save us the time to go to support but in general, the tool is shared very well in security and protection of privacy and if they are lucky they can add more features that help us our security would be great they should always be one step ahead of cyberattacks.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have implemented it two year ago.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Check Point CloudGuard Network Security maintains very good stability, and, best of all, maintains excellent compatibility with Azure.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The scalability is great. You can make a network scale up or down. This allows you to have good control of bandwidth in the organization or to be able to distribute it in the different departments of the company.
How are customer service and support?
Currently, since the implementation, not much support has been used, therefore, I rate it as excellent.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
The Check Point brand has always been used in our organization.
How was the initial setup?
The configuration was very simple since the tool and the wizard are very interactive and user-friendly. It was not very difficult to do the installation and configuration.
What about the implementation team?
The implementation started with a vendor and the IT team. The engineer that worked with us presented great knowledge of the product.
What was our ROI?
By using a tool of this type, the cost of personnel decreases since the tool performs quite well with the functions that it was designed for.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The price and the licenses have been good. They maintain a competitive price with the other companies.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Other options were not evaluated as we like to keep the same brand across solutions.
What other advice do I have?
When doing a cloud deployment, remember you are doing this in the cloud so treat it like a cloud device, as good configuration brings good results.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Microsoft Azure
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Last updated: Oct 30, 2025
Flag as inappropriateBuyer's Guide
Download our free Check Point Cloud Firewall (formerly CloudGuard Network Security) Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: April 2026
Product Categories
Firewalls Managed Security Services Providers (MSSP) Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions Cloud and Data Center Security WAN Edge Unified Threat Management (UTM)Popular Comparisons
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls
Cato SASE Cloud Platform
Check Point Quantum Force (NGFW)
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)
Akamai Guardicore Segmentation
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Check Point Cloud Firewall (formerly CloudGuard Network Security) Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- We're trying to choose between Fortinet or Checkpoint UTM firewalls. Can you help?
- Is Check Point's software compatible with other products?
- What do you recommend for a corporate firewall implementation?
- Comparison of Barracuda F800, SonicWall 5600 and Fortinet
- Sophos XG 210 vs Fortigate FG 100E
- Which is the best network firewall for a small retailer?
- When evaluating Firewalls, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- Cyberoam or Fortinet?
- Fortinet, Palo Alto or Check Point?
- If you could go back, would you change your decision to buy that firewall and why?



















