Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
reviewer1234011 - PeerSpot reviewer
Cloud architect at a tech vendor with 1-10 employees
Real User
Easy to use, straightforward installation, integrates well with other AWS products, and good support
Pros and Cons
  • "This product is easy to use."
  • "It could be cheaper."

What is our primary use case?

AWS Lambda is a Code as a Service product. It is used for running code.

What is most valuable?

This product is easy to use.

The integration with other AWS products is straightforward. For our current usage, the integration that we have is sufficient. Everything is connected to CloudWatch and it's working.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using AWS Lambda for one year.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

AWS Lambda is a stable product.

Buyer's Guide
AWS Lambda
April 2025
Learn what your peers think about AWS Lambda. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2025.
849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

This is a very scalable solution.

At this time, we don't anticipate increasing our usage.

How are customer service and support?

The technical support is great.

How was the initial setup?

The installation is straightforward and it only takes a few minutes to complete.

What about the implementation team?

I deployed it myself.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

This is a product that is pay-per-use, as opposed to a licensing fee. It could be cheaper.

There are no costs in addition to the standard pay-per-use fees.

What other advice do I have?

I use other products that are in the AWS ecosystem, including AWS WAF.

In summary, this is a good product, it does what it is supposed to, and I recommend it.

I would rate this solution a ten out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
PeerSpot user
PeerSpot user
Senior Automation Test Developer/Automation Test Architect at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
Real User
Develops release pipeline faster but no shell script is supported

What is our primary use case?

1. Use lambda function to trigger the jenkins jobs to make whole release pipeline.

2. Send the slack notification once the release with automated test is done.

How has it helped my organization?

My automation test story is we moved from CircleCI to Jenkins, then to AWS. The benefit I can see is the maintenance and budget. Ops made this decision but it did not affect automation tests and the release pipeline too much, but I have seen the release pipeline has been developing much faster.

What is most valuable?

We use AWS Function and Jenkins API to trigger the Jenkins job from the AWS CodePipeline.

Since our automated deploy jobs are on AWS, and automated tests are on Jenkins.

Then we can create the release pipeline including AWS and Jenkins and put them together.


What needs improvement?

1. Cannot checkout code from GitHub but Jenkins can.

2. No shell script supported.

3. CodePipeline cannot send notification to Slack, but we can use Slack API and Lambda Function.

For how long have I used the solution?

Less than one year.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Pretty good.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I saw Ops setup the automated release jobs faster in AWS than in Jenkins and CircleCI.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

For automation tests, it does not affect too much. 

Our Ops are all AWS experts.

What other advice do I have?

For automation developers, we do not care too much about which CI system we use. It does not affect us too much. Automation tests can be ran in most of mainstream CI systems.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
AWS Lambda
April 2025
Learn what your peers think about AWS Lambda. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2025.
849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.
reviewer1221120 - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Architect at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Consultant
Scans the cloud system and if they are any security anomalies it triggers an email
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable feature is that it scans the cloud system and if they are any security anomalies it triggers an email."
  • "The running time of AWS Lambda runs fine. It takes around five minutes but it would be great if that time could be extended."

What is our primary use case?

We have only used it for a few services. It's still in POC mode. We haven't done any production on it currently. 

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature is that it scans the cloud system and if they are any security anomalies it triggers an email. 

What needs improvement?

The running time of AWS Lambda runs fine. It takes around five minutes but it would be great if that time could be extended. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Lambda for two to three years. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

We haven't seen any issues regarding stability as of now.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It is easy to expand the platform.

How are customer service and technical support?

Their technical support is quite good. We have enterprise support, so it is quite good.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is easy. 

What about the implementation team?

I did the deployment with the help of consultants. 

What other advice do I have?

I would recommend Lambda to someone considering it. 

I would rate it an eight out of ten. 

The pricing is similar to Azure services, they are quite competitive pricing-wise if you compare Azure and AWS.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
reviewer939417 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Auditor & Compliance Officer at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
Real User
Highly stable, simple implementation, but no code option needed
Pros and Cons
  • "AWS Lambda is a stable solution."
  • "AWS Lambda could improve by having no-code or low-code options because currently, you need to be able to write code well to use it."

What is our primary use case?

I am using AWS Lambda to set up real-time notifications and backup transfers.

What needs improvement?

AWS Lambda could improve by having no-code or low-code options because currently, you need to be able to write code well to use it.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using AWS Lambda for approximately two years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

AWS Lambda is a stable solution.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

This solution is best suited for medium to large-sized companies.

How are customer service and support?

I am satisfied with the technical support.

How was the initial setup?

The setup of the solution was simple.

What about the implementation team?

The implementation of the solution was done by my colleague.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The price of AWS Lambda is priced very low.

What other advice do I have?

For those who want to use this solution, I would advise them to learn the Python programming language.

I rate AWS Lambda a six out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Private Cloud
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: partner
PeerSpot user
Saurabh Jaiswal - PeerSpot reviewer
Python AWS & AI Expert at a tech consulting company
Real User
Top 5
Event-driven capabilities optimize cost efficiency

What is our primary use case?

AWS Lambda is primarily used for serverless architecture. I have used it for web applications, particularly during my time at a company where we developed an image processing tool. It helps to trigger events on a runtime basis. AWS Lambda also has various other use cases such as machine learning processes and handling big data tasks.

What is most valuable?

AWS Lambda's serverless architecture and event-driven programming are highly valuable. You pay only for the events triggered, optimizing costs. It is beneficial for deployment CI/CD tooling and for triggering pipelines for data processing. The cost model is pay-as-you-go, with a tier for free requests and computational time. Scalability and stability are also very efficient.

What needs improvement?

AWS Lambda could offer support for more programming languages beyond Python and Node.js. The process for creating Lambdas could be simplified for beginners with less expertise in AWS.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with AWS Lambda for almost eight years.

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

Deploying AWS Lambda is pretty quick if the process is known. It takes between 30 minutes to one hour to deploy once the code is ready.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

AWS Lambda is very stable. Issues are typically related to the user’s code and can be debugged through logs such as CloudWatch.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

AWS Lambda's auto-scaling features are crucial for operations and provide great scalability. I rate the scalability of AWS Lambda at eight out of ten.

How are customer service and support?

The documentation for AWS Lambda is comprehensive and thorough, eliminating the need for frequent technical support. A 2000-page guide covers all aspects, from setup to advanced use.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup of AWS Lambda can be somewhat challenging for first-time users, primarily due to the learning curve involved. I would rate it a six on the ease scale.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

AWS Lambda has a cost model that aligns with usage. There is an initial free tier, after which charges apply based on requests and compute time. Different architectures have distinct pricing models. Despite being a bit expensive initially, the overall cost effectiveness is notable.

What other advice do I have?

AWS Lambda should be used when there is a need for event-driven programming on an as-needed basis. It might become expensive if used for continuous processes. In terms of the overall solution, I rate AWS Lambda at nine out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Flag as inappropriate
PeerSpot user