Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
it_user818688 - PeerSpot reviewer
Works at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Feb 15, 2018
We have reduced the attack surface of risky rules, improved our compliance scores, and streamlined our firewall change flow
Pros and Cons
  • "We have reduced the attack surface of risky rules, improved our compliance scores, and streamlined our firewall change flow all thanks to AlgoSec Firewall Analyzer."
  • "​R&D patches to address issues that I have encountered have been timely and effective.​"
  • "The Flash to HTML5 rewrite has been bumpy."

What is our primary use case?

Our primary use case started as policy optimization in a multi-vendor firewall environment. Now, our primary use case is giving access to firewall policies for development teams and infrastructure specialists. We are receiving better change requests based on actual requirements and less requests for access which already exists.

How has it helped my organization?

Over time, firewall vendors have added features, such as rule counters, that AlgoSec traditionally has offered. However, AlgoSec continues to add capabilities that firewall vendors simply cannot provide. We have reduced the attack surface of risky rules, improved our compliance scores, and streamlined our firewall change flow all thanks to AlgoSec Firewall Analyzer.

What is most valuable?

The ease of use and "one click" reports are very manager friendly. The policy browser is a fast, efficient way to find existing access, especially when granted via membership of a group or subnet. The ability to painlessly click through and navigate group objects ("what's in this object?") to filter.

What needs improvement?

The Flash to HTML5 rewrite has been bumpy. However, as a security professional, I appreciate the improvement in the product.

I am optimistic about possibly moving beyond AFA to other products.

Buyer's Guide
AlgoSec
January 2026
Learn what your peers think about AlgoSec. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: January 2026.
879,768 professionals have used our research since 2012.

For how long have I used the solution?

Three to five years.

How are customer service and support?

R&D patches to address issues that I have encountered have been timely and effective.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
it_user818859 - PeerSpot reviewer
Works with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Feb 14, 2018
We are able to quickly review 100's of firewalls and stay compliant.

What is our primary use case?

Firewall and Compliance.  We use the product to support the firewall review process and risk of over 400 firewalls

How has it helped my organization?

We are able to quickly review 100's of firewalls and stay compliant.  The product has been invaluable to our information security department

What is most valuable?

Policy review and compliance.  We are now using the AlgoSec FireFlow feature to help us automate the firewall ACL submission process and implementation of firewall rules.

What needs improvement?

Product has improved quite a bite in the years we have been using the product. We look forward to completing the AlgoSec Fireflow implementation and piloting the Business flow product.  AlgoSec continues to improve their product every year. 

For how long have I used the solution?

More than five years.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
AlgoSec
January 2026
Learn what your peers think about AlgoSec. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: January 2026.
879,768 professionals have used our research since 2012.
it_user810882 - PeerSpot reviewer
Programme Manager
User
Feb 14, 2018
It is used for change management and to intercept dangerous changes to firewall rules.
Pros and Cons
  • "Multi-vendor feature in a multi-vendor environment is a must. Ensures changes adhere to internal and regulatory standards."
  • "We don't dare push the new policy automatically, We don't have confidence in this feature."

What is our primary use case?

I mainly use AlgoSec for policy change management and to intercept dangerous changes to firewall rules.

How has it helped my organization?

In the past, policy changes were applied, but not always with the correct approval. Because of this, we ended up with huge holes in the rule base.

What is most valuable?

Multi-vendor feature in a multi-vendor environment is a must. Ensures changes adhere to internal and regulatory standards.

What needs improvement?

Today, we don't dare push the new policy automatically, We don't have confidence in this feature.

For how long have I used the solution?

One to three years.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

No.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Yes, Tufin.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
User
Feb 6, 2018
We can easily make our firewall flow change requests using the web interface
Pros and Cons
  • "We can easily make our firewall flow change requests using the web interface."
  • "It would be great if the product could be more simplified when defining the rules."

How has it helped my organization?

  • Centrally manage firewall flow requests
  • Approval/implementation and validation
  • We can easily make our firewall flow change requests using the web interface.

What needs improvement?

It would be great if the product could be more simplified when defining the rules.

Documentation could be added to the tools, then generate documentation and send it to the relevant people.

For how long have I used the solution?

More than five years.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
it_user813291 - PeerSpot reviewer
Networks and Security Engineer
User
Feb 6, 2018
Users utilize this tool to make their change requests
Pros and Cons
  • "Users utilize this tool to make their change requests."
  • "Automate the change documentation in MS Word format. Therefore, we can customize it, if needed."

What is our primary use case?

  • Workflow: Users utilize this tool to make their change requests, then once it is approved by a security team assessment, the network team will implement the changes.
  • Troubleshooting: Tracks the flow and sees where it is blocked.

What needs improvement?

Automate the change documentation in MS Word format. Therefore, we can customize it, if needed.

For how long have I used the solution?

More than five years.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
PeerSpot user
Expert Tehnique securité réseau at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Feb 6, 2018
When we add firewall change requests, it decreases the time for design and implementation significantly
Pros and Cons
  • "It permits us to save a lot of time and make some firewall policy clean up. Then, when we add firewall change requests to management through this tool, it decreases the time for design and implementation significantly."
  • "The Firewall Analyser feature is the most important and valuable part of this tool. This provides quick and simple visibility on the firewall's risk assessment."
  • "Default standard support at Level 1 is to answer by upgrading to the latest released version, if you are not using it yet."
  • "Improve the dashboarding capability for FireFlow which is currently very limited in terms of presentation and customisation."

What is our primary use case?

This solution was implemented to provide risk analyse, audit on rules, and changes, as well as giving visibility to the application or project manager on firewall rules that are linked to their servers for a massive datacenter migration. 

How has it helped my organization?

For a massive migration, it permits project/application owners to estimate and anticipate changes which are needed autonomously and only involve the security administrator for implementation of the rules. This permits us to save a lot of time and make some firewall policy clean up. Then, when we add firewall change requests to management through this tool, it decreases the time for design and implementation significantly.

What is most valuable?

The Firewall Analyser feature is the most important and valuable part of this tool. This provides quick and simple visibility on the firewall's risk assessment in regards to compliance's referential that can be also customised to fit our organisation's requirements. 

What needs improvement?

Improve the dashboarding capability for FireFlow which is currently very limited in terms of presentation and customisation. 

For how long have I used the solution?

More than five years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Not really. Sometime after the version upgrade, a few bugs appeared. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Not yet. 

How are customer service and technical support?

At the beginning, support was good. 

Now as support is composed of several levels, default standard support at Level 1 is to answer by upgrading to the latest released version, if you are not using it yet.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We did not have such a tool before installing AlgoSec for a firewall policy audit with reports. We had a homemade tool for change management.  

How was the initial setup?

Find a good integrator.

What about the implementation team?

We went through a vendor team. His expertise was medium.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We evaluated differents solution when launching the project, like Tufin. This one was the most mature.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
it_user808449 - PeerSpot reviewer
Extranet Architect with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Feb 6, 2018
It has streamlined our process for access and firewall management
Pros and Cons
  • "AFA provides project teams with a simplified way to obtain the status on their current rule set."
  • "It has streamlined our process for access and firewall management."
  • "Needs integration to cloud ITSM tools, such ServiceNow."
  • "Be able to automatically analyze application traffic with machine learning capabilities and propose simplification for rule set optimization."

What is our primary use case?

We use AlgoSec FireFlow and AFA modules for risk analysis, audit, and change management to enforce appropriate security compliance.

How has it helped my organization?

It has streamlined our processes for access and firewall management. It is used by all the IT user community internally and by our service provider who is in charge of our IT run activities.

What is most valuable?

AFA and FireFlow modules are the one that we use. 

  • AFA provides project teams with a simplified way to obtain the status on their current rule set. 
  • Fireflow is used for our change management process and is linked to our CP FW. 

What needs improvement?

Integration to cloud ITSM tools, such ServiceNow.

Be able to automatically analyze application traffic with machine learning capabilities and propose simplification for rule set optimization.

For how long have I used the solution?

Three to five years.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
it_user284391 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Network Security Specialist at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Aug 24, 2017
We now have baseline and rules checking.
Pros and Cons
  • "We now have baseline and rules checking."
  • "It would be nice if it was more variable when checking virtual domain baseline in the same way as Fortigate's firewalls do."

What is most valuable?

  • Templates
  • For baselines PCI-DSS

How has it helped my organization?

We now have baseline and rules checking.

What needs improvement?

It would be nice if it was more variable when checking virtual domain baseline in the same way as Fortigate's firewalls do.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've used it for one and a half years.

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

We had issues with the clusters.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It's slow to synchronize a database that is not synchronized.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

No issues encountered.

How are customer service and technical support?

Customer Service:

It's good.

Technical Support:

It's good.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

No previous solution was used.

How was the initial setup?

There were some issues when setting up the cluster and getting it to synchronize properly.

What about the implementation team?

I did it myself.

What other advice do I have?

You need to be able to script and have skills using Linux.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free AlgoSec Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: January 2026
Buyer's Guide
Download our free AlgoSec Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.