Network & Collaboration Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
More visibility into our firewall and security environment using a single pane of glass
Pros and Cons
  • "The product gave us more agility on the process to analyze and resolve tickets by requesting permissions to access services not enabled by default."
  • "The product should support more vendors with the same in-depth analysis that it already is providing. This would give more reasons to for other companies to adopt it."

What is our primary use case?

We use it daily to check existing rules created on all our firewalls and existing flows that are allowed, and if we can improve the performance of our firewalls by just doing the rearrangement of rules, etc.

We got more productive and agile using the product since the most time consuming job of our team is the creation of firewall rules, analyzing what is already created based on the requests of our users and internal costumers. The solution provides us an in-depth detail of what we have already in production and what we can do to resolve tickets/requests in the most effective way.

How has it helped my organization?

We now have more visibility into our firewall and security environment using a single pane of glass. We have a better audit of what our network and security engineers are doing on each device and are now able to see how much we are complaint with our baseline.

The product gave us more agility in the process to analyze and resolve tickets by requesting permissions to access services not enabled by default. At the same time, providing visibility of what we can improve on the scenario that we are already running on it.

What is most valuable?

The quick wins that the product can help us to achieve. With a few rule arrangements, we can improve the rule processing of the firewalls, increasing their performance and reducing possible bottlenecks, but keep us under the defined baseline of the company.

Also, the gain on the agility of checking what we already have created. The rules that can accommodate new requests instead of creating new rules have definitely helped us to resolve tickets in a faster way, achieving the expected SLA from users and internal customers of the company.

What needs improvement?

The product should support more vendors with the same in-depth analysis that it already is providing. This would give more reasons to for other companies to adopt it and make us preserve the investment in case we change the running environment.

Buyer's Guide
AlgoSec
May 2024
Learn what your peers think about AlgoSec. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2024.
770,616 professionals have used our research since 2012.

For how long have I used the solution?

Five months.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It is very stable without any major issues.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We don't see scalability on this product as a showstopper. We are confident that we can grow without any impact.

How are customer service and support?

Very good. They helped us on everything that we needed.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We stopped using FireMon due to the price and lack of features.

How was the initial setup?

No.

What about the implementation team?

Through a vendor who fulfilled all our expectations.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

It is fair. 

For cloud environments, it can be expensive. The model adopted to use as licensing for the cloud environment should be reviewed since it sometimes can increase the value of the service/product in an unexpected way. For example, they should instead use the amount of instances, which should just take into consideration the number of Security Groups and ACLs.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

No.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
PeerSpot user
Network Administrator at Türkiye İş Bankası
Real User
FireFlow enables us to search equipment between the source and destination and saves us time
Pros and Cons
  • "We are in the process of implementing FireFlow in our daily operation, which will make our lives even easier. The idea is to search the Firewall Analyzer for the equipment between the source and destination, and then automatically jump off to FireFlow and open a ticket. This will then automatically implement what is needed without the need to go into the Firewall itself. This will save us a lot of time and will help us to onboard junior engineers very quickly, getting them up to speed on our network and daily operation in record time."
  • "One important thing they should improve is their support level. We have a lot of trouble with the basic enterprise support level. They are very slow to respond and solve problems."

We have been working with the AlgoSec firewall analyzer for almost six years in the product environment. It is well suited for firewall security optimization, tuning, change management, and application discovery. The most important feature is the Intelligence Policy Tuner (IPT) skills. This helps us know which devices are between the source and destination on the flows.

Since we increased our support level to preferred support, the support level has been very good for two months. They solved all the problems and the response time is very fast. Therefore, if you are working with AlgoSec, you should choose the preferred support license. If you have the chance, you must try this with this type of support that they are well equipped of people.

We are in the process of implementing FireFlow in our daily operation, which will make our lives even easier. The idea is to search the Firewall Analyzer for the equipment between the source and destination, and then automatically jump off to FireFlow and open a ticket. This will then automatically implement what is needed without the need to go into the Firewall itself. This will save us a lot of time and will help us to onboard junior engineers very quickly, getting them up to speed on our network and daily operation in record time

In the end, we tried other vendors for POC and all of them have problems. When we compared with AlgoSec, they were much worse and AlgoSec leads this sector. That’s why we are using Algosec in our environment. Also, it is the most growing vendor in their specific area, and it has much more skills that have been very helpful to analyze firewalls.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
AlgoSec
May 2024
Learn what your peers think about AlgoSec. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2024.
770,616 professionals have used our research since 2012.
reviewer1115961 - PeerSpot reviewer
Works at a maritime company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Change automation has made our IPS team more efficient and effective
Pros and Cons
  • "We have been able to increase the effectiveness of the team, allowing them to prioritize more complex and business-critical tasks in a faster manner."
  • "In terms of integrations, we would like to see a greater number with the upcoming and next-generation tools (i.e. SOAR and a selection of other SIEMs)."

What is our primary use case?

The automation and orchestration of security-related change requests on our selected firewall (in our case Checkpoint) to decrease the time it takes to raise, manipulate, and execute change requests. This is all done with minimal interaction from our Firewall and IPS team, allowing them to more effectively use their time.

How has it helped my organization?

It has eased the process of streamlining our firewall configuration management considerably. Our firewall and IPS team now has the ability to budget their time and focus on other tasks, rather than dealing with repetitive change request functions. This has enabled the team to work much more efficiently and effectively.

What is most valuable?

The feature we found most useful is the automation of the change process within our organization for firewalls. This feature has reduced the number of mundane tasks the firewall and IPS team undertake on a regular basis. We have been able to increase the effectiveness of the team, allowing them to prioritize more complex and business-critical tasks in a faster manner.

What needs improvement?

In terms of integrations, we would like to see a greater number with the upcoming and next-generation tools (i.e. SOAR and a selection of other SIEMs). This has been a problem for us, as we are going through the process of enhancing our security and some of the products we are looking at are lacking built-in support (integration). 

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Real User
Helps to maintain and provide regulatory compliance metrics and to optimize the overall security of the organization
Pros and Cons
  • "It saves time by allowing administrators to test network traffic and pinpoint which rules are being triggered for a particular traffic flow."
  • "I would like the reporting to be more customizable, as per user and auditing needs."

What is our primary use case?

The AlgoSec Firewall Analyzer was greatly used for firewall analysis, policy tuning, and optimization. The automated change management feature was very useful and integrates seamlessly into the change management process.

How has it helped my organization?

This solution helps in maintaining and providing regulatory compliance metrics and to optimize the overall security of the organization. It provides great visibility into your firewall rules, thereby allowing you to eliminate redundant or overlapping rules. It saves time by allowing administrators to test network traffic and pinpoint which rules are being triggered for a particular traffic flow.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable features to me were the following:

  1. Testing network flows and optimizing firewall policies.
  2. Obtaining regulatory and compliance metrics for audits.
  3. Visualize complex networks using the topology maps.
  4. Simple interface and ease of navigation.

What needs improvement?

The product has a lot of great features already. However, I would like the reporting to be more customizable, as per user and auditing needs.

For how long have I used the solution?

Less than one year.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It is a highly scalable solution as per my experience.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I haven't used any other solutions.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I do not have much information on the pricing, as I wasn't part of the actual procurement process. I was told that the pricing and licensing was comparatively fair.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I did a basic evaluation of FireMon, which had identical features to the AlgoSec Firewall Analyzer.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
reviewer1019766 - PeerSpot reviewer
Works at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
I like the ability to manage all network security equipments centrally

What is our primary use case?

  • To manage the various network security equipment deployed
  • Be able to detect unauthorized changes in those equipment.

How has it helped my organization?

It is still being deployed, but it shall enable reliance on more third parties out of the IT security team without losing the assurance that the configurations are under control. 

What is most valuable?

  • Ability to manage all the network security equipment centrally
  • Ability to delegate to local ITs the network security equipment change requests
  • Ability to decrease the necessary workload to enable network connections, troubleshoot
  • Ability to detect unauthorized or non-compliant changes in the network security equipment configuration.

What needs improvement?

Ability to manage more diversity of equipment, as well as simplify the management of the various workflows.

For how long have I used the solution?

Still implementing.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

No previous solution.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Yes: Tufin.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
reviewer1003620 - PeerSpot reviewer
Works with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Enables us to track the complete process of the change, have it fully documented and implemented much faster than it was before

We are using AlgoSec for security policy change management. 

Firewall environment in our enterprise consists of Check Point firewalls, which controls communication between a couple of our LAN areas (Office, Production, Facility, Logistic, Development...). The frequency of service requests coming to the queue can be very high and that put a lot of challenges in front of the security team. The additional challenge is that we also have an outsourcing company which implements those service request for us.

We searched for the product that would help us to deal with such challenges and after a couple of comparisons, we decided to go with AlgoSec. That was a decision we never regretted.

AlgoSec is allowing us to track the complete process of the change, have it fully documented and implemented much faster than it was before.

I can highly recommend AlgoSec, it makes everyday work easier.

What we would like to see in the future from AlgoSec, is integration with Cisco DNA Center in order to track TrustSec changes in SD-Access fabric.

Since we already see that integration with Cisco ACI is in place, I suppose that integration with another controller for Software-Defined Networking should be on the product roadmap.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
PeerSpot user
VP Global Cyber Security Operations at NTT Security
Real User
Unused rules, hidden rules, and dangerous combinations of rules are easily found and tracked
Pros and Cons
  • "Unused rules, hidden rules, and dangerous combinations of rules are easily found and tracked by using AlgoSec."
  • "AlgoSec is able to provide a consistent view into all of an organization's firewalls, regardless if the management is done by different companies."
  • "I would like to see continued expansion to other firewall versions, platforms, and vendors."

What is our primary use case?

Since approximately 2005, I have used AlgoSec in almost all of the companies that I have worked at. AlgoSec Firewall Analyzer (AFA) continues to be my favorite product, as well as the core of other AlgoSec products. My teams use AFA to validate firewall (FW) changes, see hidden and complex rules, identify dangerous combinations of rules across many enterprise firewall situations, and enable a risk-based approach to firewall rules and associated risk management.

How has it helped my organization?

AlgoSec is able to provide a consistent view into all of an organization's firewalls, regardless if the management is done by different companies, e.g., Check Point's, Cisco's, and Palo Alto's firewall policies are presented to the security team in a consistent format. This enables risk management decisions to be made without detailed understanding or experience in various underlying firewall technologies or management systems.

What is most valuable?

AFA is the best feature. It shows consistent information regardless of the underlying platform. Unused rules, hidden rules, and dangerous combinations of rules are easily found and tracked by using AlgoSec.

What needs improvement?

  • I would like to see continued expansion to other firewall versions, platforms, and vendors. 
  • I would also like to see continued work on the roadmap.

For how long have I used the solution?

More than five years.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
it_user829395 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Software Engineer at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Able to monitor all firewalls under one umbrella. ​Needs better technical support.
Pros and Cons
  • "Setup is easy. ​Just run the script and all seems fine."
  • "Auditors can get PDF or CSV reports without having to give them access to firewalls."
  • "To be able to monitor all firewalls under one umbrella."
  • "​Needs better technical support and quicker response times.​"
  • "Having the ability to patch an issue as oppose to upgrading the entire suite."

What is our primary use case?

To be able to monitor all firewalls under one umbrella. It makes it easy for customer to get their reports.

How has it helped my organization?

  • Reports run easily to my management.
  • Searching on IP address to find out the firewalls.
  • Streamline tickets

What is most valuable?

Reports and baseline are the most important feature for auditors. Auditors can get PDF or CSV reports without having to give them access to firewalls.

What needs improvement?

Having the ability to patch an issue as oppose to upgrading the entire suite.

For how long have I used the solution?

One to three years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Once you upgrade to latest version, it is stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

No issues.

How is customer service and technical support?

Needs better technical support and quicker response times.

How was the initial setup?

Setup is easy. Just run the script and all seems fine.

What about the implementation team?

In-house with some help from Professional Services, who are knowledgeable and helpful.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Pricing is okay and the licensing can be a little tricky with the initial setup.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We evaluated other options. FireMon and Tufin were on the list but AlgoSec won out. It is better.

AlgoSec may be little pricier with its licenses, but it is probably better than any of other competitors.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free AlgoSec Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: May 2024
Buyer's Guide
Download our free AlgoSec Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.