Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
InfluxDB Logo

InfluxDB Reviews

Vendor: InfluxData
4.1 out of 5
Badge Leader
Leave a review

What is InfluxDB?

InfluxDB is open-source software that helps developers and enterprises alike to collect, store, process, and visualize time series data and to build next-generation applications. InfluxDB provides monitoring and insight on IoT, application, system, container, and infrastructure quickly and easily without complexities or compromises in scale, speed, or productivity.

Get the InfluxDB Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about InfluxDB, Zabbix, Datadog and more!
InfluxDB is the #2 ranked solution in top Non-Relational Databases, #5 ranked solution in top NoSQL Databases, #8 ranked solution in top Open Source Databases, #22 ranked solution in best Network Monitoring Tools, and #25 ranked solution in Infrastructure Monitoring tools. PeerSpot users give InfluxDB an average rating of 8.2 out of 10. InfluxDB is most commonly compared to Zabbix: InfluxDB vs Zabbix. InfluxDB is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 58% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a computer software company, accounting for 10% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
InfluxDB
December 2025
Get the report
Helped 879,259 peers since 2012

Featured InfluxDB reviews

Read more reviews

InfluxDB mindshare

Product category:
Open Source Databases
As of December 2025, the mindshare of InfluxDB in the Open Source Databases category stands at 5.1%, up from 2.8% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Open Source Databases Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
InfluxDB5.1%
PostgreSQL15.2%
Firebird SQL13.6%
Other66.1%
Open Source Databases

PeerResearch reports based on InfluxDB reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryOpen Source DatabasesDec 29, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersDec 29, 2025Download
ComparisonInfluxDB vs MySQLDec 29, 2025Download
ComparisonInfluxDB vs PostgreSQLDec 29, 2025Download
ComparisonInfluxDB vs Firebird SQLDec 29, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Zabbix4.2N/A95%108 interviewsAdd to research
Datadog4.3N/A97%209 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated Dec 28, 2025

Valuable Features

InfluxDB excels in ease of use and learnability. It integrates effectively with Grafana for monitoring and provides strong documentation and performance. Users value its integration capabilities, cloud offering, and ability to handle time series data efficiently. Low latency and real-time monitoring are crucial features. Its UI is well-designed, enabling easy data visualization. InfluxDB supports heavy workloads, offers a reliable query language, and delivers fast response times, making it suitable for high-performance environments.
  • "Overall, InfluxDB delivered excellent performance, stability, and simplicity for telemetry-driven use cases."
  • "My advice for others looking into using InfluxDB is to use it the same way I did, because it is really stable, easy and friendly to use, and it is a great product overall."
  • "It helps me maintain my solution easily because it is very reliable, so we didn't face any performance issues or crashes regarding our queries; we can get the results very fast."

Room for Improvement

InfluxDB could benefit from an improved user interface and better integration with Chronograf. Initial setup complexity and insufficient error logging are concerns. More metrics on technologies, better query language support, and SQL abstraction are desired. There is a need for enhanced backup capabilities, high availability features, and clustering in the community version. Documentation requires enhancements, and challenges with data loss and configuration need attention. Improved query language development and support for NoSQL format are requested.
  • "However, I cannot ignore the challenges I faced while configuring the database with my message brokers, whether Rabbit or Kafka, because the documentation is not properly provided."
  • "I chose an 8 out of 10 because there is room for improvement, such as regarding backups and enhanced security through other types of authentication or encrypted data in TLS."
  • "I haven't seen a return on investment; unfortunately, I cannot share relevant metrics such as time saved, fewer employees needed, or money saved."

ROI

Some organizations found that InfluxDB reduced time to display data and decreased the number of people needed for project management. Others did not observe measurable benefits or were unable to quantify metrics like time or cost savings. Time savings were noted by some, though not all shared financial improvements or efficiency gains.

Pricing

InfluxDB offers an open-source option, making it accessible to users without licensing fees. However, scaling introduces extra costs, and recent pricing changes have shifted from yearly to monthly subscriptions, increasing overall expenses. Some users find the current costs high. While the open-source version suits many without licensing fees, those requiring additional features may face higher financial commitments.
  • "The tool is an open-source product."
  • "InfluxDB recently increased its price. It is very expensive now."
  • "InfluxDB is open-source, but there are additional costs for scaling."

Popular Use Cases

InfluxDB users utilize it for various purposes, including database storage, log aggregation, and monitoring services. They employ it in on-premise, cloud, and containerized environments for real-time data collection, storage, and visualization. Use cases range from monitoring casino and maritime operations, satellite KPIs, and production sensors to handling crypto market data and Cisco products. Users appreciate its integration with tools like Grafana and Docker, aiding in metrics analysis, trend generation, and reporting in industries like trading and environmental management.

Service and Support

Many rely on forums and documentation for assistance, finding them effective and informative. Some experience delays or limitations with direct support, noting that premium support offers faster access to expertise. Occasionally, teams encounter unresponsive communication or conditions restricting help. Those opting for community resources generally find success without needing direct contact. Some express satisfaction with the community's extensive knowledge, while others point out discrepancies in data recovery and support limitations.

Deployment

InfluxDB's initial setup is generally straightforward and quick, often taking only a few hours. Some found the process slightly complex when configuring clusters, as logs were unhelpful during issues. Deployments via repositories for various operating systems simplify installation. While new users may find the setup daunting, it becomes easier with familiarity. Different deployment methods, such as Kubernetes and Docker, are commonly used, benefiting from scripts that expedite the process.

Scalability

Users mention InfluxDB's scalability as adequate for small to large teams and organizations, with instances where scalability successfully supports extensive data needs and continuous operations. Licensing costs may be considerable for enterprise scaling. Some users have not required scaling beyond initial setups, while others note InfluxDB's robust capacity for monitoring and reporting applications. Challenges include data backup stability and handling high throughput, suggesting some utilize additional tools to manage extensive workloads efficiently.

Stability

InfluxDB is consistently stable, with most users reporting no issues with reliability, downtime, bugs, or crashes. Some users recommend regular checks on volume metrics. Stability rated as a seven by users who lost data in a few incidents. InfluxDB supports applications as crucial infrastructure, stopping only when processing large data amounts without Kafka. Integration with Kafka resolved these issues by managing message throughput effectively.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our InfluxDB Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise7
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business94
Midsize Enterprise52
Large Enterprise203
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Computer Software Company
10%
University
9%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Outsourcing Company
6%
Energy/Utilities Company
6%
Healthcare Company
5%
Educational Organization
4%
Government
4%
Transportation Company
3%
Hospitality Company
3%
Construction Company
3%
Wholesaler/Distributor
2%
Performing Arts
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Retailer
2%
Non Profit
2%
Logistics Company
1%
Insurance Company
1%
Media Company
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Legal Firm
1%
Engineering Company
1%
Mining And Metals Company
1%

Compare InfluxDB with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about InfluxDB

InfluxDB has become a popular insight system for unified metrics and events enabling the most demanding SLAs. InfluxDB is used in just about every type of industry across a wide range of use cases, including network monitoring, IoT monitoring, industrial IoT, and infrastructure and application monitoring.

InfluxDB offers its users:

  • Infrastructure and application monitoring: Collect, process, and analyze real-time data from edge devices to help optimize distributed infrastructure. 
  • IoT monitoring and analytics: InfluxDB is designed to store large volumes of time series data and quickly perform real-time analysis on that data. Gain insights from all the sensor data and use the collected data to create and perform automated tasks. 
  • Network monitoring: Manage responsive and high-performing networks with widely distributed resources.

InfluxDB Benefits

There are several benefits to using InfluxDB . Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

  • APIs and ready toolset: InfluxDB can be accessed via a set of powerful tools enabling users to get started quickly, with less programming required. This includes a REST API, extensive client libraries, a wide variety of open-source integrations, and Flux - a functional data scripting language for querying, analysis, and events. The InfluxDB API can be used to write data from edge devices to the InfluxDB instance 
  • Time series engine: Get any data - events, logs, traces - from any edge device - systems, sensors, queues, databases, and networks. This data is stored in a powerful and high-performing engine capable of ingesting millions of data points per second.
  • Community: InfluxDB has a large community of cloud and open-source developers ready to assist users. 
  • Ready-made templates: Use InfluxDB Templates, a set of tools with a packager and other ready monitoring solutions. These tools allow users to share their monitoring expertise with coworkers and other community members around the world. The Templates gallery offers available templates for some of the most popular tools and applications.
  • Enhanced UI: InfluxDB’s UI includes an explorer, dashboarding tools, and a script editor. Use it to easily browse the collected metric and event data and apply common transformations. The dashboarding tool comes with a variety of visualization options that help users view insights from the data. The script editor assists users to quickly master Flux with easily accessible examples, auto-completion, and real-time syntax checking.

Reviews from Real Users

InfluxDB stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its flexible integration options and its data aggregation feature.

Shalauddin Ahamad S., a software engineer at a tech services company, notes, “The most valuable features are aggregating the data and the integration with Grafana for monitoring.”

InfluxDB customers

ebay, AXA, Mozilla, DiDi, LeTV, Siminars, Cognito, ProcessOut, Recommend, CATS, Smarsh, Row 44, Clustree, Bleemeo

Related questions

  • 36
When evaluating Open Source Databases, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 31
Did you switch from a different solution to MySQL? Can you list a few pros and cons for making the move?
  • 75
Which database is the best for session cashing?
  • 19
Why is Open Source Databases important for companies?
  • 130
Which low-code (no-code) database solution do you prefer?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Open Source Databases
Non-Relational Databases
Network Monitoring Software
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
NoSQL Databases

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Zabbix vs InfluxDB Logo
Zabbix vs InfluxDB
Datadog vs InfluxDB Logo
Datadog vs InfluxDB
New Relic vs InfluxDB Logo
New Relic vs InfluxDB
Juniper Mist Premium Analytics vs InfluxDB Logo
Juniper Mist Premium Analytics vs InfluxDB
PRTG Network Monitor vs InfluxDB Logo
PRTG Network Monitor vs InfluxDB
MySQL vs InfluxDB Logo
MySQL vs InfluxDB
PostgreSQL vs InfluxDB Logo
PostgreSQL vs InfluxDB
Splunk Observability Cloud vs InfluxDB Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud vs InfluxDB
Nagios XI vs InfluxDB Logo
Nagios XI vs InfluxDB
Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs InfluxDB Logo
Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs InfluxDB
Redis vs InfluxDB Logo
Redis vs InfluxDB
Checkmk vs InfluxDB Logo
Checkmk vs InfluxDB
MariaDB vs InfluxDB Logo
MariaDB vs InfluxDB
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs InfluxDB Logo
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs InfluxDB
MongoDB Enterprise Advanced vs InfluxDB Logo
MongoDB Enterprise Advanced vs InfluxDB
See all alternatives
 
InfluxDB Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Senior System Developer at Norled5.0We use InfluxDB as a key component in our maritime vessel data application for its reliable time-series storage and query capabilities. Although it performs well, integrating it with Azure Kubernetes for backups is challenging, and a SQL abstraction could be beneficial.
Deployment Engineer at Derq4.0I used InfluxDB for real-time KPI monitoring of satellite networks and found its time series capabilities and integration with tools like Kafka and Telegraf valuable, though better documentation and a NoSQL variant would improve usability.
Network engineer at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees4.0I've used InfluxDB for 2–3 years to monitor Cisco devices via Prometheus and Grafana; it's stable, user-friendly, and efficient, though it could improve backup and security features. It’s saved me significant troubleshooting time.
Student at a educational organization with 1,001-5,000 employees3.5I've used InfluxDB for a year in my greenhouse project to store and visualize sensor data; it's stable and effective, though the interface is complex and better built-in visualization would reduce the need for Grafana.
Chief Technology Officer at Presta Agency5.0We are developing a trading agent using InfluxDB for low-latency data collection on crypto prices to support machine learning models. While its time series data handling is ideal, the deprecation of FluxQL affects its intuitive querying compared to our previous solutions, CassandraDB and ScyllaDB.
Site Reliability Engineer(Observability) at Sapiens4.0I find InfluxDB useful for data insertion but need additional tools for alerting and visualization. Config file issues can disrupt data collection, and the agent struggles with authentication, requiring extra scripting which affects service restarts.
Cloud and DevOps Engineer at Betaque3.5We initially used Prometheus and Grafana but switched to InfluxDB for its intuitive user interface, allowing easy customization and data visualization. However, InfluxDB's inability to provide local data backup when using its cloud service is a drawback.
Senior Specialist at Qualitest3.5I'm using InfluxDB to store documents and populate data through its funnel. Its most valuable feature is the ability to integrate with other tools. However, I find the UI needs to be more user-friendly, with improved integration documentation.