Splunk Enterprise Security Reviews

We use the solution to find systems acting strange or having strange services and security attacks.

Splunk Enterprise Security helps us sift through tons of data to find relevant information we're looking for as far as activity goes.

The solution's most valuable feature is the aggregation of all the logs in one place, using enterprise securities built-in or ESCU use cases to find them.

The end-to-end visibility Splunk Enterprise Security provides in our environment is very important because we might not see everything or miss something without it.

Once you have it set up correctly, Splunk Enterprise Security works great for helping us find any security event across multi-cloud, on-premises, or hybrid environments.

Splunk Enterprise Security has helped improve our organization’s ability to ingest and normalize data. The ability to identify and solve problems in real-time is pretty robust.

Splunk Enterprise Security has helped reduce our alert volume with RBA and has helped reduce our mean time to resolve. With correlation searches in risk-based alerting, you don't have to sift through information; it is presented to you.

The solution's case management system could be further improved to make it easier for analysts to manage cases. The only limiting factor is the amount of data you're sifting through and the overall size of the number of correlations you're looking for.

I have been using Splunk Enterprise Security for seven to eight years.

I rate the solution’s stability an eight out of ten.

I rate the solution ten out of ten for scalability.

The solution's technical support is awesome, and I love it.

I've deployed the solution a few times. The deployment is very labor-intensive and takes a lot of work.

Splunk Enterprise Security is an expensive solution.

I would recommend the solution to other users.

Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Our SOC is using Splunk Enterprise Security as a SIEM. There are multiple use cases because it is the main tool for SOC analysts. We have plenty of use cases. It is being used for IT security monitoring. We also have some custom use cases for securing applications, and then we have some of our internal customers developing their own use cases, but the main purpose is for the SOC. 

We also have additional work that is much more tricky. It is related to using AI to detect insider threats.

We are incredibly increasing our coverage as per the NIST framework that we are using for our operations. We are always extending. That really took off after implementing Splunk. It was a big moment. I have been there from the very beginning when we started implementing Splunk. Like everything new, there was a little bit of difficulty, but after we implemented it, there was an incredible increase in our SOC efficiency.

Splunk Enterprise Security helped reduce our mean time to resolve based on my knowledge, but I do not know how much because I left the department one year ago. On the security monitoring side, we have very good MTTR globally due to Splunk and the processes that we have implemented. We have other kinds of tools. Compared to the other tools that we have, our MTTR is far better with Splunk. Compared to last year, it was reduced by half. It was already good, but it got reduced a lot again.

It is lovely to have everything we need in one tool. Everything is quite centralized.

AI is everywhere, and I feel we need to discover AI for cybersecurity. For the last five years, I myself have been setting up a product and evaluating AI, but I did not do it directly in Splunk because there was some fear about the performance on the platform. That is why we chose to build our own platform based on S3 and AWS to execute and run all the algorithms and send the data back into Splunk. We now have a good base with innovation. We have a better base to directly include machine learning use cases in Enterprise Security, but they need to provide more capability and autonomy to the customers because there is so much to do. When you are lucky enough to have a team of data scientists, they want to have free hands, so a balance has to be found between giving a lot of autonomy and putting enough control so that they do not do something stupid on the platform, which can impact the performance of the standard use cases as well. There is a compromise there. However, AI is growing so fast that you absolutely need to give autonomy to the team to manage and utilize AI. This means providing easy access to a new library to build machine learning. They need to give us some flexibility, and it seems that with the new toolkit, it would be okay. Data scientists love to have freedom.

Splunk Enterprise Security provides us with the relevant context to help guide our investigations, but it would be interesting to add even more context, for instance, in order to raise the level of risk. That is something that can be implemented. For instance, when it comes to data loss prevention, it is known that somebody who is about to leave the company is much more likely to take data. If you have this information soon enough, because the person will tell HR in advance, you can increase the level of risk for data loss for that user, but you do not always get to know that in advance. In such cases, some indicators in the behavior of the users who are leaving could be connected to AI. For instance, if you are using natural language programming, you can grab emails with words like farewell. There are plenty of keywords that you can catch that would give you an indication that the person is about to live. When you have internal and external partners, they can leave at any time. You do not always get the information in advance, but there are always farewell parties or goodbye emails. You can use this kind of information to raise their risk on the specific alert. It is efficient in the sense that you decrease your false positive rate. To me, AI is something that can help them accelerate and improve on what they are already doing.

Splunk Enterprise Security is very costly. Pricing is probably its weakest spot.

I have been using Splunk Enterprise Security for five years.

It is difficult for me to answer this because I am no longer in charge now, but it has been stable from my point of view. 

Its scalability is good provided you have the right license agreements.

It depends on the situation. The problem at our end that is causing an issue with Splunk support is that we have a customized environment. All the problems that we submit are specific, and they can be a bit difficult to solve. Sometimes, their support is efficient, and at other times, we have to wait a bit too much. I would rate their support a seven out of ten.

Neutral

I arrived at the time of transition. We were probably using RSA. We switched to Splunk Enterprise Security because we needed to jump to another scale. At that time, there was a complete change in the organization. We went from the old-school cyber to Cyber 2.0. We had a lot more visionary managers who came from other companies where they were using Splunk. We had good guidance.

It was a bit difficult. The team that was developing the use cases did not have access to the real data because it was not ready yet. Developing a SOC use case without the data is something difficult. That is why it was difficult at the start, but it was not because of the tool. It was more of a matter of project management. After we moved on from the difficult stage, we were able to set up this use case factory where some of the users were themselves in a bit of self-service mode. This was a very good opportunity to enlarge our capability to cover all the applications in the best way.

For Splunk, we use AWS. We have a private cloud. We have difficulty using cloud-managed services.

Pricing is probably its weakest spot. As compared to some competitors, Splunk is really expensive. The problem is that Splunk is like Rolls-Royce. It, for sure, is the best one. Gartner says it, and the customers say it, but sometimes, you do not need a Rolls-Royce to get to the supermarket.

The problem is that the licenses that we have are based on the volume of data that we ingest in a day. The data that we ingest is only growing. We have initiatives right now for better management of data. It makes sense in terms of storage and sustainability. The pricing model, especially for Europe, is difficult. I am just out of the negotiation for the renewal of the license. We bought it for three more years. This is good news for Splunk and us as well, but it was difficult to discuss with the sales and explain that we do not want to increase the cost because it is already too high, and if it could decrease, it would make sense. It is very difficult to have this understanding from the salesperson. It was difficult for my Splunk account partner, but we succeeded in the negotiation. It was a win-win situation.

They need to be fair and adjust the price as per the usage. If the price goes too high, we would just have a no-go from the top level of the company, which would be a pity. It can happen. It has happened in the past. At some point, we had a big contract with Microsoft for Office, and we are now with Google. It was a shock for the partners and people inside the company, but we did it. We now have Google and we are happy with it. We still have a bit of Microsoft. It is important to keep the balance.

We are looking at the data usage with Splunk's team. We are looking at whether the data onboarded and dashboards that were developed are really being used to avoid wastage. If any data is not necessary in Splunk, we just stop onboarding it. We have other data to onboard anyway. My idea is to be much more efficient in the way we are managing the data and not to go the way we did it in the past.

I did not evaluate other solutions but the company surely did.

Splunk's unified platform has not helped consolidate networking, security, and IT observability tools, but it is not due to the tool. It is due to our company's structure. I have been part of the two teams. Previously, I was a part of the cybersecurity team, so I was mainly using Splunk Enterprise Security. Now I am leading the monitoring team, so I am much more on the SOC side of it. My team provides service to the cybersecurity team that is using Splunk Enterprise Security. In the end, we would like to have one solution, which would be Splunk. I would like to have IT monitoring and observability with ITSI in the future. This centralization would bring efficiency. One log being used for cybersecurity purposes can also be used for other purposes. Everything centralized would give us the most efficient way to access the data and limit duplication. It would be helpful for efficiency, cost control, and data governance.

It is absolutely crucial for us to have end-to-end visibility. For our cybersecurity needs, we should be able to reach anything. We even have this concept of Watch the Watcher, so visibility is absolutely key. We have the opportunity to audit the activities of even cyber analysts, so visibility at every stage is absolutely key. For example, all the SIEMs could be under attack, which would be a nightmare. Imagine it being an insider threat where the attacker knows what exactly we are monitoring. With AI, these kinds of risks are even higher. That is why we are all in for AI for Cyber and Cyber for AI. We need absolute visibility, but we also need protection.

Splunk Enterprise Security has not helped us reduce our alert volume. We are not at that level of maturity at this point. It is still growing.

I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security a nine out of ten. It is a good product. It needs some progress with AI, but based on what I have seen in the presentation for version 8, it seems promising.

We use Splunk Enterprise Security for our security analysts for them to be able to view incidents. They are not 100% dependent on Splunk Enterprise Security as their incident source. They do have other tools that they use and other things like whois data, threat intel, and lookups for our domain. They are able to quickly look at the activities done for the assets that we have.

I am not from the management or the leadership, but I do feel that it has been helpful for us Splunk engineers who are responsible for looking at all the data and logs. Splunk Enterprise Security quickly gives us a view of an endpoint or a user or identity. If I want to look for an identity or an asset, I just quickly go into Splunk Enterprise Security. I know where to go and get a quick analysis for a respective object. The analysts have their dashboards, and they have their action items. They use it differently. They follow all the common procedures.

We are on-prem. We are not on the cloud. As of now, Splunk Enterprise Security does not provide us with end-to-end visibility, which is one of the drawbacks of why we need to use other tools. It is not that Splunk Enterprise Security cannot do it. It is just the way it is configured right now. We are working with Splunk engineers. We have a lot of professional service hours that we spend with them bringing all parties into the picture and doing working sessions.

Right now, Splunk Enterprise Security is in the middle in terms of helping us find any security event across our environment. Based on the way the configuration is done in our environment, it would not be right to say that the incident would be reported accurately from Splunk Enterprise Security. That is because not a lot of data is being put into Splunk Enterprise Security to make something a notable event and report about it. If we configure it better and have more data models normalized, and then we use it, it will be more helpful. It has been a long-term goal, but we will reach there soon.

Splunk Enterprise Security has helped improve our organization’s ability to ingest data.

Splunk's unified platform has not helped consolidate networking, security, and IT observability tools. I am an engineer, and I am more into administration and creating user interfaces on Splunk Enterprise itself, not Splunk Enterprise Security. We have done some work on Splunk Enterprise Security and then left it with analysts. It is up to the analysts now. Splunk Enterprise Security is not 100% configured. Some basic data models have been set up. They are generating notables, and we are generating alerts out of it, but it is not 100% there. They do have to use other tools such as their networking tools to get a full picture for incident reporting.

One of the most popular features that I personally like is that in the case of an event, I should be able to run a desired action for that on a threshold, but that is not how we are using it right now, unfortunately. We have a pretty manual process. We have an operating procedure, and we follow that. I would like to see it automated. I do not want analysts to decide whether the action needs to be done or not. It should be done provided the policy says so. If the policy says it needs to be done, it should be an automatic process rather than a manual process.

At Splunk .conf24, I saw a demo for Splunk Enterprise Security 8. All the things that they have done in Splunk Enterprise Security 8 are what it can be better at. They have put Mission Control as a part of the notable or finding itself. The investigation shows the findings, and the findings allow us to do everything that we are doing in Mission Control right there on that same screen. That is what we want now. They said it is going to be released in two to three months. We are hoping that we will be able to use it. I was hoping that I would be able to see version 8 when I am here at Splunk .conf24, and when I go back, I would be able to help them implement it, but it is still 7.3.

I have been using Splunk Enterprise Security for two years.

It is pretty stable.

It is pretty scalable. We have a huge deployment. It is good.

We are a huge agency. It is in the public sector. We have 15 terabytes of data.

They are good. We have a huge team of Splunk engineers within our company. Some of them are contractors, and some of them are employees. They are pretty responsive.

Based on my interaction, I would rate them an eight out of ten. Some engineers do not understand what is there to solve, and they start pushing their perspective on the customer, which is not how it should be because it is not their environment.

Positive

We did not use any similar solution previously.

The deployment of Splunk Enterprise Security was very simple.

We have professional service hours. We worked with Splunk engineers, and we had live working sessions. We were doing it like that. We did it for over a period of time, but that did not give us the full power of Splunk Enterprise Security. For that, we need to be able to configure our own data models and normalize the data. That is not happening 100%.

It is quite expensive.

We did not evaluate any similar solutions.

At this time, I cannot assess Splunk Enterprise Security in terms of the ability to identify and solve problems in real time, but we do use regular Splunk to pinpoint a lot of problems. It helps us a lot. We are able to pinpoint a lot of things, whether they are vulnerabilities or pointing to some logs in the firewall or authentication logs. All the analysts use it very frequently to write searches.

Splunk Enterprise Security has not helped improve our organization’s business resilience because we are not 100% dependent on it. 

Splunk Enterprise Security can provide us with the relevant context to help guide our investigations. However, the input is not 100% perfect, so the output is not 100% perfect.

I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security a ten out of ten.

We use Splunk Enterprise Security to monitor our network environment for abnormal activities and threats.

We easily monitor multiple cloud environments with Splunk Enterprise Security.

Insider threat detection helps our security posture.

I use the threat intelligence management feature whenever I do a threat analysis.

When Splunk detects breaches and malicious activities it notifies our IT team so they can analyze the notifications and respond accordingly.

Splunk has helped our organization by allowing us to gain valuable insight through the analysis of large datasets.

The customizable dashboards are user-friendly and visually appealing.

It has helped reduce our alert volume.

It has helped speed up our security investigations.

The most valuable feature of Splunk Enterprise Security is website activity monitoring.

While Splunk Enterprise Security offers valuable features, its cost is high and could be more competitive.

I have been using Splunk Enterprise Security for around five months.

Splunk Enterprise Security is stable.

We frequently connect with the support team to review our options. They resolve our issues quickly.

Neutral

We also use IBM QRadar but Splunk Enterprise Security is more functional and user-friendly.

Splunk Enterprise Security is expensive.

I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security eight out of ten.

For someone who wants to use the cheapest solution, I would tell them that this is the best solution and worth the cost.

I recommend Splunk Enterprise Security to others.

The primary focus of our work with Splunk is on security incident monitoring and security log monitoring. This involves utilizing it to analyze and respond to security events effectively. Additionally, compliance with regulatory requirements is another crucial aspect of your role. We also extend Splunk's functionality to custom applications by writing custom parsers and handling logs specific to those applications. This includes the development of unique dashboards tailored to the needs of each application.

Splunk's capabilities in insider threat detection are highly effective in assisting organizations in identifying unknown threats and anonymous user behavior. The sophistication of these features is notable, making them suitable and beneficial across a range of organizational sizes, from small businesses to large enterprises.

The threat topology and MITRE ATT&CK features are seamlessly integrated as complementary components within Azure.

It significantly accelerated security investigations, and I believe the improvement falls within the range of twenty to thirty percent.

The resilience provided by SIEM adds significant value; it is highly effective.

The most valuable features for us include its robust log management capabilities, which allow us to efficiently handle and retain logs for extended periods as needed. The flexibility to customize log retention periods is particularly beneficial. Additionally, we find the dashboard functionality and the advanced query language options to be highly valuable. These features, especially the powerful query language, are extensively utilized in our day-to-day operations.

I find that the learning curve for Splunk is relatively lengthy. To utilize it effectively, one needs a substantial amount of time for learning. I might appreciate a learning curve that comes with more out-of-the-box functionality, such as easily installable Splunk apps or user-friendly features.

I have been working with it for three years.

I find it to be highly stable, and I would rate it a solid ten out of ten.

I would rate its scalability capabilities ten out of ten.

Before using Splunk, I relied on the built-in tools of Linux operating systems, such as Syslog NG, but specifically the open-source versions. I haven't had experience with the commercial version of Syslog NG, which is a more advanced tool. In this category, Splunk is essentially my first exposure to such advanced features.

Setting up Splunk is quite straightforward, especially for basic configurations. The process is not overly complicated. While a cluster implementation may require more advanced steps, the basic setup is generally easy to handle.

I handled the deployment independently, but the required personnel depends on the organization's size and the expected outcomes. For larger organizations, especially when the new tool integrates with various departments like operations, development, and security, it becomes a collaborative effort. In such cases, it's not a one-person job and involvement from multiple departments is essential. However, for smaller companies, the process is less complicated. It involves coordinating with support and developer teams to communicate the implementation, and the focus is on providing the necessary outputs from the tool to support their ongoing work effectively.

I utilized it in a single, non-geographically dispersed location. My experience is limited to a single site, and I haven't worked on a multi-site installation.

While it can run stably for a certain period, eventually, there is a need to manage or archive logs, especially if your background storage is not unlimited, as is often the case in these scenarios.

The return on investment is quite favorable with Splunk, particularly for large enterprises that have made the initial purchase and possess the requisite expertise and technical support.

In terms of pricing, I believe Splunk is unreasonably costly for the majority of mid and small-sized companies. Its real advantages, or what sets it apart, seem to be more suitable for large enterprises.

For the market I focus on, which includes small to medium-sized companies, I would recommend Wazuh. It's an open-source security information and event management solution. The main consideration is that, in terms of both functionality and cost, Wazuh is sufficient for the requirements of smaller enterprises. Utilizing an open-source tool like Wazuh can effectively cover the necessary areas without the need for the higher costs associated with Splunk.

I would recommend that anyone considering implementing Splunk should first thoroughly assess their environment. It's crucial to determine whether Splunk is genuinely needed for your specific usage scenario or if a smaller software solution might suffice. Overall, I would rate it nine out of ten.

I use Splunk Enterprise Security for monitoring, threat hunting, and quick response. By implementing Splunk Enterprise Security I aimed to address security challenges and threats for both myself and my clients.

Splunk Enterprise Security has significantly improved our organization by centralizing data and enabling efficient correlation across multiple vectors. The benefits were realized quickly after deployment, with noticeable improvements within the first three to six months.

Splunk Enterprise Security has sped up my security investigations, approximately by 30-40%.

The most valuable features of Splunk Enterprise Security are its high-performance data collection, flexible query language, and its versatility across the organization. The unique query language, once mastered, provides flexibility, and the tool extends beyond just security, benefiting network and development teams. This versatility and speed in searching and trend identification enable quick defense for my clients. For me, it is about fast detection, rapid response, and easy access to crucial data.

Splunk Enterprise Security could improve in automation, flexibility, and providing more content out of the box. The effort required for tuning and management is higher compared to some other solutions. Focusing on automation and reducing the engineering effort would enhance its effectiveness. I would like a store platform similar to what Sentinel offers to be included in the next release of Splunk Enterprise Security. Additionally, the pricing structure needs improvement.

I have been using Splunk Enterprise Security since 2016.

The stability of the solution is quite good.

The scalability of Splunk Enterprise Security is good. The solution is stable and performance-driven, making it well-suited for scalability.

The community support for Splunk is excellent, with an engaged user community. However, for the standard technical support, unless you opt for the premium, I would rate the support as three on a scale of one to ten. It is not as helpful as desired.

Negative

Before Splunk Enterprise Security, I used various solutions, including LogRhythm. I chose Splunk because it proved to be more stable and reliable, especially compared to the issues I experienced with LogRhythm. With Splunk Enterprise Security, it takes my analysts approximately 30-40% less time to resolve alerts compared to our previous solution.

Monitoring multiple cloud environments using Splunk Enterprise Security dashboards is moderately easy, around a six out of ten. Setting it up requires a fair amount of engineering effort, especially for non-Splunk Cloud environments like Azure and GCP. Once configured, monitoring becomes straightforward, allowing easy creation of use cases and efficient log monitoring for improved cloud security.

The initial deployment of Splunk Enterprise Security was complex, involving significant engineering effort and tuning. It took anywhere from three to twelve months, which is considered a relatively long time. In comparison, deploying Microsoft solutions typically takes around six weeks on average, which is a significant difference in deployment efficiency.

The implementation strategy for Splunk Enterprise Security involved workshops, high-level design approval, and phased deployment covering physical deployment, log collection, testing, and tuning. Typically, three people from my team (project manager, lead engineer, and lead analyst) and around half a person from the customer's side are involved. Maintenance is substantial, requiring a team of 13 engineers for 60 customers, ensuring not everything breaks simultaneously.

I find Splunk Enterprise Security to be overly expensive, and their pricing model lacks flexibility. There is no consumption-based pricing, and dealing with Splunk can be challenging. They seem rigid, less accommodating, and often don't listen to customer needs. A more flexible and customer-friendly pricing approach, aligning with industry trends, would be appreciated.

Before choosing Splunk, I evaluated other options, including QRadar. However, if I were to evaluate them today, my choice might be different.

If you are willing to invest in engineering effort, Splunk Enterprise Security provides excellent visibility into multiple environments, including cloud, on-premises, and hybrid setups. While some solutions may require less effort, Splunk is capable and versatile, making it a strong choice for comprehensive visibility across diverse IT environments.

Assessing threat detection capabilities in Splunk Enterprise Security is like evaluating how easy it is to drive a car. It provides powerful tools, but mastering the query language for utilizing these features requires effort. Once you know how to use them, it becomes an effective tool for detecting unknown threats and monitoring user behavior.

I use the Splunk Mission Control feature, which is highly important to my security operations. It is particularly valuable for multi-tenant and multi-site mission control scenarios. The Splunk Mission Control feature is effective for centralizing threat intelligence and ticketing system data when dealing with a single entity or group. However, its usefulness diminishes when managing multiple customers with diverse policies and groups.

The features in Splunk for discovering the overall scope of an incident, including the topography aspect, are considered industry standards. However, the topography feature is not particularly useful in my case, so I don't extensively use it.

Splunk Enterprise Security is effective for analyzing malicious activities and detecting breaches, especially if you invest the effort. However, newer solutions are considered better and more flexible. While Splunk was an industry leader five years ago, today, platforms like Microsoft Sentinel may outshine it in terms of ease of use, especially for users unfamiliar with Splunk.

Splunk Enterprise Security has helped me detect threats faster compared to other solutions. It stands out in terms of speed and effectiveness.

My advice to others is that if you are looking for the cheapest solution, Splunk may not be the right choice. Consider alternatives like LogPoint or Arctic Wolf, but be cautious as they might not offer the quality and capabilities needed for effective security. Sometimes it is better to invest in a more robust solution than settling for a cheap option that might not meet your requirements. Overall, I would rate the solution as a six out of ten, mostly because of its pricing.

We use the product mostly just to pull out the reports, medical investigations, et cetera. As a security analyst, we can look at and pull data. You can make a central hub for a lot of different sources, including servers and endpoints. It makes it easy to check logs for every device connected.

If you are a data analyst, security analyst, or anyone who basically requires a set of data in your database job, and you have to have normalized data represented or, just to check for any patterns, this is quite helpful. With Splunk, you can pull in the data, you can transform it, and represent the data via graphs or pull the data and export it into Excel and perform further investigations. The use cases are quite deep. 

With this product, you can go for an in-depth search or just perform a surface-level search. There are different modes in which you can perform searches, and that basically defines the speed of how fast you can get the data. If you are going for a more detailed version offered, it'll take a bit of time. However, they'll give you more and more data. There's also a fast mode in it. 

The data which you can pull, you can basically visualize it, you can normalize the data, evaluate it, and convert the data into tables. It's much easier to pull the data, organize it, and normalize it as you are performing the searches. That's quite helpful.

I prefer working with cloud infrastructure like this as you can increase the storage capacity or the license at any time and search for a number of different endpoints. If you want to ingest more and more data, having something like Splunk available on the cloud is preferable. 

I take advantage of the incident response part of the solution. If anything happens at the endpoint, if anything happens at the user system, servers, or something like that, my role is to look into the logs, go through other investigations, perform a time scan, and create a timeline of all the events. This helps do that job.

I'm also aware they have a Mission Control. I have actually attended a few surveys on that, however, I haven't really implemented it due to the fact that we are in the middle of a few of the projects, and things are at higher priority as of now. So we haven't really focused on that.

Using Splunk, we can check out what server versions we have. If we just cross-check with the database, we can see if we have any availability and then we can pull in the files. If you have a database, you can perform a query to check for any particular problems in the entire environment. For the threat notifications, it's quite helpful.

Indirectly, it's helped us reduce our alert volume. If you have a list of files, you can run it through the environment and, based on that, create rules and exceptions. This indirectly helps reduce alert amounts. You can go through false positives and sort them out as well and create a rule against them. 

It's helped speed up security investigations. Being a central hub of logs, we can jump into a different log or source and jump into any investigation. You don't have to jump from one tool to another. This automatically reduces the investigation time. 

There are lots of free learning materials on their website. 

Overall, things are quite easy. It's a simple solution. 

I haven't explored beyond the security aspect as a data analyst. I haven't noticed any shortcomings so far. 

I've been using the solution for more than a year now. 

There are different modules, and I haven't activated all yet, however, the stability is okay. I would rate it seven out of ten. If we run into issues, there are materials they provide and online support. You can even call them. 

The solution is deployed to one location. It's deployed across the entire environment. 

The level of scalability depends on the license you have. You can expand or reduce it based on the environment. It does cost more money to scale, however.

I would rate scalability seven out of ten. 

Support is quite responsive. They also offer 24/7 support services. 

Positive

I previously used Palo Alto XDR. 

I also used an email solution whose name I can't recall. You could check emails flowing into or out of your environment.

I wasn't involved in the deployment; the solution was set up when I arrived. 

That said, I did go through some setup videos, and the process does not look difficult. They provide the steps for every aspect. There's also always support you can reach out to if you have questions. 

There may be some maintenance required in terms of upgrading. When you upgrade the version, you may need to upgrade your sensors on the endpoints. However, Splunk is quite compatible with other devices, so it's not difficult. In our company, the administrators handle maintenance. 

I haven't witnessed an ROI in terms of how I'm using the tool. 

It's mostly for EDR. You can cover servers as well; however, that requires additional licenses. Pricing is based on usage. As an EDR specialist, I interact with the tools and perform investigations. I don't deal with licensing directly.

This is quite new to me. I've only recently started working with Splunk. I used to work in EDR. It took me two to three months to understand the internal architecture of the organization, and based on that, I can use Splunk for all kinds of searches. So, how long it takes to realize the benefits of Splunk depends on the person and the complexity of the environment. 

I did not evaluate other options. I adopted this tool when I joined my current organization. 

We're a Splunk customer. 

To those considering just going with the cheapest solution, it depends on your level of comfort with support. If you have a cheaper tool, the support would be addressed. With Splunk, that's the difference - their support response. If you have a tool with a good license, you will be able to get immediate help if there's any vulnerability.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. 

I'd advise others to take time to learn the solution and develop skills. It's all about DSL queries. If you are off on queries, it won't give you any results. You need to be accurate with your SQL commands.

We have many use cases for firewall logs in our system. We collect logs from these firewalls and customize our use cases.

The triad is one of the best features. The product has a good security posture. It provides many customizations.

The glass table feature does not perform as expected. It must be improved.

I have been using the solution for seven years.

The tool is stable. I rate the stability a seven or eight out of ten.

I rate the product's scalability an eight out of ten.

If something doesn't work, we reach out to the support team. The support provided by the team is great. The support is part of the entitlements in the license we buy.

Positive

I'm using Microsoft Sentinel. It is a cloud-native tool. Compared to Splunk Enterprise Security, Microsoft Sentinel is easier to handle. We use Splunk Enterprise Security because we have to manage a big infrastructure and may have many security vulnerabilities. The cybersecurity team decided to use Splunk Enterprise Security. The volume of data is high, so it is easier to manage it in Splunk.

The initial deployment was complex. If we need to customize the solution, we need one to four weeks to get all the data, manage the license, and calculate the resources.

The solution is costly. The cost is calculated based on the volume of data ingested per day.

It is not complicated to monitor multiple cloud environments using Splunk. It is one of the best solutions. The multiple cloud integration is open source. It's really helpful to monitor the structure and user authentication. I would definitely suggest it to people.

It's feasible to achieve visibility into multiple environments using the product. The cloud solution is recommendable. The on-premise product is tedious to manage, but it will be easier if we have a good resource to take care of the administration as an architect.

The tool has threat-detection capabilities. There are some limitations. We have a set of rules and patterns where we collect the tagging and the data we want to alert. It would have been better if detection and threat analysis recommendations were available out of the box. Though the solution keeps updating with the market demands, I still feel that the feature needs to be more reactive.

The product has inbuilt use cases for analyzing malicious activities and detecting breaches. It helps us run our alerts to catch malicious actions like brute force attacks or user-related authentication challenges. Splunk Enterprise Security has helped us reduce our alert volume. It has many automations and integrations. The SOAR tool detects and automatically manages repetitive and generic alerts proactively.

Splunk Enterprise Security helps us speed up our security investigations. It's at the top of its game. The tool is proactive and helps us take action before something happens. It has reduced our security threats. It is saving us hours of investigation. If you have a big data source, then I would recommend Splunk Enterprise Security. It will be easy for you to manage the data load. If you do not have a high data volume, you can look for other solutions like Sumo Logic.

My experience with the solution is really good. It has the capability to analyze the platform and take care of vulnerabilities. There is scope for improvement. We have a huge data volume of 2 TB per day. Our platform needs a solution like Splunk Enterprise Security to maintain the data volume and filter out our security vulnerability logs.

Overall, I rate the product a nine out of ten.

Our SOC uses the solution to monitor our corporate and franchise environments.

Risk-based alerting is the most valuable feature. It really allows me to drive down the alert count and the alert fatigue for my analysts to make the alerts they see more valuable and actionable. The way that alerts are handled is better in Splunk. SPL is easier in Splunk. The UI of Splunk makes it easier for our analysts to move around and see what they need to see.

There are a lot of areas that are currently being improved that I want to be improved. Features related to content management must be improved. The product is adding more drill-downs.

When the tool was originally set up, things were not configured properly due to the rapid deadlines for installing everything. Now, we have to go back and recover a lot of things that aren't properly configured.

I have been using the solution for approximately four years.

I haven't seen any issues with stability. Most of the stability issues I've seen have actually been on the on-prem hardware.

We have no issues at all with scalability. The tool has high scalability and usability. The size of our environment is relatively large since it is an enterprise solution. We have around 5000 users and a franchise base.

I have never had an issue with Splunk’s support team. Every time I ask a question, I usually receive really quick responses. We are in the middle of a migration, and the engineers helping us migrate to Splunk Cloud have been fantastic every step of the way. They provide really rapid and complete answers when we ask questions.

Positive

I use LogRhythm a lot. I worked for an MSSP, so I have seen several products. So far, Splunk has been my favorite.

We have definitely seen an ROI on the solution. Any security tool has a fantastic ROI. A lot of companies don't like to budget for security until there's an incident or something goes terribly, terribly wrong. Just having that SIEM and having eyes on potential security issues is an ROI.

We are behind a few versions. So I hope that as we upgrade, I get more ideas for what I'd like to improve. We're still in the process of moving to the cloud.

The product has improved our organization's business resilience. The right tools are available to our analysts within the product, and we use them daily. It has drastically driven down our time to remediate, which is huge for us. It's huge for any company. We don't want four hours to find out that something has gone terribly, terribly wrong. Finding such issues before they turn into full-blown security incidents has been our biggest impact.

Splunk Enterprise Security empowers our staff. It is so user-friendly. It allows our analysts at every level to learn the tool and learn more about security through the tool. I progressed from level one. Now, I'm a content developer for enterprise security. The usability of Splunk is the best on the market. The solution has helped reduce our mean time to resolve.

As we add new features and applications into Splunk, time to value is pretty quick on most things. As long as we have someone that's willing to go through the effort to configure, the time to value is rapid. Adding applications to Splunk is a seamless experience. The UI of Splunk makes life so much easier. Some of my experience is based on technical debt in the organizations I worked with. I would probably rate the tool a ten if we didn't have so much technical debt.

By attending Splunk conferences, I get to learn about all the new tools and how to implement them. I use it for RBA and Machine Learning Toolkit. I develop content for our company. I am here to learn how to implement RBA and Machine Learning Toolkit better to reduce alert fatigue for my analysts.

Overall, I rate the product an eight out of ten.

Most times I use Splunk Enterprise Security for log analysis, and I also use it to create alerts for any security incidents. There are some alerts I set up on my endpoint, and once the alert is triggered, I get a notification. I also use it for visualization. I create my own dashboard to send to my managers for analysis, for reports, and all of that.

The ability to easily aggregate data and make meaningful reports is what makes Splunk Enterprise Security excellent. If I want to search for the number of failed passwords, I can go to my index, write my query, and create a report quickly. When my manager wants me to create a report concerning a particular incident, I go to my dashboard, type my query, create my dashboard from there, and everything works out smoothly.

They should put out more educational resources for users to learn how to use Splunk Enterprise Security. If they could have a manual or guide similar to Linux, where users can search and see various commands for different searches, it would help users navigate their way around the product more easily so it wouldn't be so complex.

I have been using Splunk Enterprise Security for over two years now.

There was one instance when I was trying to use the Forwarder and it wasn't working properly. Apart from that, Splunk Enterprise Security has been perfect for me.

When trying to connect to other endpoints using the Splunk Enterprise Security Forwarder, I encountered connectivity issues. This occurred while setting up for a company, and the connection wasn't working properly.

I have used Wazuh.

The pricing could be reduced to make it more accessible.

I would rate Splunk Enterprise Security an eight out of ten.