Skyhigh Security Reviews

We use it to discover, protect, and permit.

Skyhigh for Shadow IT provides us visibility into the Shadow IT. It helps us in blocking high risk services and also in containing the data exfiltration to these high risk services.

It help us monitor high risk services, blocking them, and also feeding them to our egress points.

The risk management feature.

Integration with other technology ecosystems.

Initially, there were stability issues, but now it is perfect.

No scalability issues.

The support team is very good.

We did not previously use a different solution.

The initial setup was okay.

The implementation team was proficient.

Have a risk-based approach towards pricing.

There were none to evaluate at that time.

It is an innovative, dynamic tool.

Skyhigh's shadow IT capability and cloud risk registry are the two most helpful tools for our organization.

We are able to see what cloud services are being used with much more clarity than with our proxies and more importantly identify that we are using many cloud services we were not aware were even cloud services. Especially collaboration services. The cloud risk registry has been great for getting a quick and clearer understanding of the risk of proposed services that we are looking at allowing. Previously we were paying for expensive industry reports.

The Skyhigh for Google Drive interface and policy engine is a bit confusing and limited when compared against other Google Drive CASB capabilities.

We deployed the FedRAMP GovCloud version, which was not quite up to date with the mainstream version and still had some bugs to work out. Some other features are still in the works. We also found that it is important to ensure your inputs to the system are all uniform as it would have made for a more rapid deployment.

Excellent.

Excellent.

Skyhigh provided a FedRAMP solution, tokenization, a better shadow IT capability, and lower cost.

The vendor team was excellent.

We primarily use the solution for security purposes. McAfee in general is very good for that.

The solution is stable. The performance has been great.

It's an easy-to-use product. We find it to be quite user-friendly.

The scalability of the product is excellent. 

Overall, we have been very happy with the product. It's been working well.

The installation was straightforward and pretty simple. 

The pricing of the solution could be adjusted to make it more reasonable. 

I"ve been using the solution only for a couple of months at this point. It hasn't been a long period of time just yet. It's still new to me.

The product is quite stable and we have found the performance to be good. It doesn't crash or freeze. there are no bugs or glitches. We are happy with its capabilities.

The solution can scale if you need it to. A company shouldn't have any issues expanding it.

We have one or two customers that use it at this time.

We've been satisfied with technical support overall. They have been helpful and responsive. We have no complaints in terms of their overall capabilities.

The initial setup was not overly complex or difficult. It was straightforward. We found it simple. A company shouldn't face any issues with the implementation.

The solution could improve the cost a bit.

You do need to have a license in order to use the solution. I cannot speak to the exact costs.

I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten overall. We are pretty happy with its capabilities and have no complaints. 

I'd recommend the solution to other users and companies. 

• Box API features with DLP capabilities
• Shadow IT

Our organization is moving much of its non-sensitive data to Box. We needed the ability to have full visibility into what was occurring within the Box infrastructure, from Skyhigh to Box API integration.

SkyHigh has the ability to place users or groups on a ‘Watchlist’; which allows you to see certain views with these Watchlists users/groups in them. This is great when you are looking at live data but if I wanted to generate a report on "only" the watchlists.

Two and a half years.

No.

Skyhigh has been improving their product and releasing upgrades on a consistent basis. Now, the stability and speed are greatly improved. Looking forward to their next major release.

No, since I am able to use my blue coat logs.

A 10 out of 10

A nine out of 10.

No.

Straightforward. Guidelines and instructions are very easy to follow.

Our implementation was in-house. Since the deployment of this cloud access security broker (CASB) was rather simple, there was no need to bring in a third-party vendor.

The biggest thing to watch for is the difference in price per monitored user for the different API integrations. We currently only use the Box API, but we thought about using the Salesforce one. However, it was drastically more expensive per user. We are starting to look at the 365 monitoring since we may migrate there soon, but I have not looked at the pricing for it yet.

No.

User analytics.

The user activity identification improved.

The services take some time to load. It would be helpful if the loading time was reduced.

I have been using it for the past few months.

No issues.

No issues.

No issues.

I have not used the support as of now.

No.

I was not a part of the initial setup.

• Skyhigh's Shadow IT capability
• Cloud Risk Registry
• DLP policies and anomalies

We are able to see what cloud services are being used with more clarity than with our proxies. More importantly, we can identify that we are using many cloud services in which we were not aware that they were even cloud services, especially collaboration services. The cloud risk registry has been great for getting a quicker and clearer understanding of the risk of proposed services that we are looking at allowing. Previously, we were paying for expensive industry reports.

Finally, anomalies are key players to identify the intruders in an organization.

1. The Skyhigh for Google Drive interface and policy engine is a bit confusing and limited when compared against other Google Drive CASB capabilities.
2. The de-tokenization process
3. Data anomalies

More than two years.

Yeah, a little bit.

Sometimes.

No.

Excellent.

Excellent.

No, we haven't

The vendor team was excellent.

Good.

Not applicable.

Skyhigh provided a FedRAMP solution, tokenization, a better shadow IT capability, and lower cost.

Netskope.

Needs stability and additional new features.

• Prevents unauthorized data being shared from external sources.
• Enforces data loss prevention.
• DLP reporting and deep integration.

• Malware and spam mails
• Attacks from hackers
• Data privacy

Detecting threats.

One year.

No.

No.

No.

A 10 out of 10.

A 10 out of 10.

No.

The initial setup was straightforward.

We implemented in-house.

Our ROI is 150%.

The pricing is reasonable.

No.

Tokenization.

High-risk services.

De-tokenization.

One year.

No.

No.

No.

A 10 out of 10.

An eight out of 10.

No.

We implemented in-house.