SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint Reviews

We are using SentinelOne within our company in servers and endpoints and we have deployed it for some of our clients.

The most valuable feature of SentinelOne is the EDR functionality. We are protected against threats, such as ransomware.

SentinelOne could improve by reducing the price.

I have been using SentinelOne for approximately one year.

The stability of SentinelOne was fine.

SentinelOne is scalable.

We have approximately 300 users using this solution.

The initial setup of SentinelOne was straightforward.

The price of SentinelOne is on the higher side compared to other solutions, such as Symantec.

We have one person who maintains the solution.

I rate SentinelOne a seven out of ten.

I use SentinelOne for security.

We function as an internal red team and do numerous tests of attack simulations. SentinelOne has helped us to improve our security by fine-tuning our current use cases and creating new ones. 

SentinelOne's best features are test automation, playbooks, incident response, use-case improvement, and compliance with MITRE ATT&CK techniques.

SentinelOne's performance and the accuracy of its incident filtering could be improved.

I've been using SentinelOne for five years.

SentinelOne is stable.

SentinelOne is scalable.

The initial setup was straightforward because we created an implementation plan and did some diagnostics before starting.

We used a third-party team. 

SentinelOne's pricing could be lower.

I would give SentinelOne a rating of eight out of ten.

I use SentinelOne to protect against ransomware attacks, validate incoming emails, and ensure websites don't have any malicious coding.

SentinelOne's auto-rollback feature is the most valuable.

SentinelOne's phishing feature could be improved.

I've been using SentinelOne for around five years.

SentinelOne is stable and reliable.

SentinelOne is easy to scale.

SentinelOne's technical support is helpful and competent.

Positive

The initial setup was straightforward and completed within a day because we had run a POC with them to understand the environment and had all the information we needed. I would rate the setup process 3.5 out of five.

We did the implementation in-house with the support of SentinelOne engineers.

I would give SentinelOne a rating of eight out of ten.

We are using SentinelOne for an endpoint view of the corporate network.

The most valuable features of SentinelOne are the endpoint detection of threats, and it does not only rely on signatures for detection.

SentinelOne could improve by creating an autopilot or automated way to roll out the solution more efficiently which would be helpful.

I have been using SentinelOne for approximately one year.

SentinelOne is stable.

I rate the stability of SentinelOne a five out of five.

The scalability of SentinelOne is not a problem. These solutions can easily host up to 10,000 endpoints if not more, and we have 500. We do not have an immediate need to scale, but it is not an issue. As the company grows, the company will increase the usage of the solution.

I am satisfied with the support from SentinelOne.

SentinelOne is not too difficult to set up. The full deployment took a couple of months. The lengthy installation was caused by the fact that many people are remote working and we had 500 systems to install the solution on.

We did our own deployment of SentinelOne. We used three to five people for the deployment.

I rate SentinelOne an eight out of ten.

It's pretty good. The best thing is it has a secure shell command that you can use to get into any endpoint and do some jobs. That's a pretty cool feature. 

It's pretty much the same as similar typical solutions. It is a CrowdStrike, or SentinelOne, or Windows Defender. They do the same thing. 

The pricing is pretty good. 

It's probably not that top-notch like CrowdStrike or Microsoft Defender. However, it's okay, it's not bad. 

The only problem I have is they don't manually review the threat files. That's the only thing I'm concerned about.

The support needs improvement. There are some limitations. 

I've used the solution for less than six months. 

It is a very stable product. There are no bugs or glitches, and it doesn't crash or freeze. It is reliable. I'd rate it a nine out of ten. 

No matter what software you use, you need to do some fine-tuning.

The solution is scalable. You can pretty much deploy to anywhere.

In terms of if we need to send them some actual threat, they cannot manually verify it. That's the limitation of the company. However, for Microsoft, or Symantec, or CrowdStrike, you can actually submit a threat file, then they can manually review it. That's the only thing I've found so far with SentinelOne. The support is not that good. Obviously, probably eventually, they will get it in one year or two years' time; however, right now, it's not there.

Neutral

I've used CrowdStrike, Carbon Black, and Microsoft Defender as well. 

SentinelOne, CrowdStrike, and Carbon Black do the pretty much same thing. It all depends on the money.

The good thing about Microsoft and CrowdStrike is they can detect the device based on the traffic they're coming from. This is one of the advantages you have. With SentinelOne, this is where they're lacking. For example, for Windows Defender, if you're using your phone, you can figure out it's coming from your phone, or as long as it's coming to your enterprise network, you will know where it's coming from. This is one of the things I could not find in SentinelOne. You can only define it once you deploy it. However, without a proper deployment, you can't actually see it. For the other technologies, even though you don't deploy them, you can actually have a good understanding of the entire fleet and what's happening. For example, all emails are going to Office 365, so that's another way you get an excellent picture of the inventory assets. That's a very good NDM thing that you got it for free. With SentinelOne, they're not to that level yet.

The initial setup is easy. It's even simpler than, for example, Windows Defender. 

The maintenance is very low. It depends on how big the organization is. The false positive rate is very low. Obviously, it should be maintained by a team. Regardless, if it's Windows Defender, CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, or Symantec, it has to be built and looked after by a soft team.

For the functionality you get, the pricing is pretty good. I'd rate it four out of five in terms of affordability.

I was actually evaluating Windows Defender. I just want to check to see the selling points and the advantages of having Defender over Symantec products.

I didn't do a technical job; I just evaluated the product. I don't have a partnership with SentinelOne. 

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten. They are pretty good overall. 

In comparison to CrowdStrike, they use a lot of ICANN fees in the UI. But this isn't a problem for me because I am already familiar with CrowdStrike's interface and navigation panel. I still don't use the hamburger mini version of CrowdStrike because I am used to the old panels.

The rollback issue isn't marketed by CrowdStrike. I'm certain of it. We can, however, do it indirectly. If you want to do rollback in craft with RTR over Windows shadow copies, there is a workaround. 

This is an argument I occasionally use against SentinelOne. If you use rollback, your system has already been infected. CrowdStrike claims, that they don't do this, they are not a backup solution, and they don't allow any ransomware to work in their systems. 

By the way, rollback is a plus in the eyes of customers.

If CrowdStrike can do it with a single click, it will be a great turn of events.

The ability to get queries by pressing the "tab" button is a plus for SentinelOne.

SentinelOne makes it more difficult to define users.

It is difficult to manage users in SentinelOne.

There are many defining roles. It is granular, but it is also complicated. It is more granular than CrowdStrike, but it is not preferred because you have to check hundreds of roles. It's a challenge.

This user assignment feature would be more efficient. It would be fantastic if they could design it.

In comparison to CrowdStrike, EDR is less detailed. CrowdStrike provides more information about an adversary than SentinelOne.

Having a good EDR is a huge plus. In my opinion, it earns two points. The number will be nine if they can expand it with a more detailed one. 

I could complain about SentinelOne's pricing right now, but I am sure CrowdStrike is using its own staff to provide its clients with a complete solution. Being expensive is a little more reasonable than you think. 

Most people want to know why CrowdStrike is more expensive than other options.

CrowdStrike can assist you with their technical personnel, and CrowdStrike is the only provider who can assist you with their own threat hunters. SentinelOne is not currently doing this.

I have been using SentinelOne for three weeks.

I deployed it on my computer. I am testing it and trying to evaluate what is missing between the two products. I would like to see both of their advantages and disadvantages, which are not written. I am trying to gain real-life experience with these products. I have a lab. 

On these virtual machines, I have at least ten vendors. Some are legacy antiviruses, while others are next-generation antiviruses. I have worked with a variety of brands. These labs are being used for comparison.

I use automatic updates. As a result, it's most likely the most recent version.

The thing is, I can't say a thing about it because I need to digest a lot of data and launch a lot of attacks on SentinelOne, which I haven't done much of. Two or three assaults.

It was successful in prevention and detection, but I need to try some other methods to see if I can bypass SentinelOne.

This solution is currently being used by only two people. Myself and one of my teammates.

Not right now because things will be different in the real world, but we are only two computers with SentinelOne. So we didn't have that kind of experience right now.

When compared to CrowdStrike, the initial setup is more complex.

It only took me 10 minutes to install it on two PCs.

At this time it is only a trial. After the trial period, I am going to purchase two licenses from SentinelOne. To make comparisons too and continue investigating both products.

We simply want to compare in real-life conditions CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, Microsoft, and other legacy antiviruses such as McAfee, Micro, and so on.

If you are running an enterprise business, you should definitely go with CrowdStrike, but if you are on a tight budget, you could look into SentinelOne, but CrowdStrike is the better option. If you can stretch your budget.

If you need next-generation antivirus and EDR solutions or if your budget is limited, you can consider SentinelOne, but if you can increase your budget or convince your management to increase your budget, CrowdStrike would be ideal.

I am simply checking. I am not a customer. I am not a partner. I'm a CrowdStrike partner. I am only using it for my own needs. Because people frequently inquire about the differences between other brands and CrowdStrike. 

People come to me for CrowdStrike assistance. And I have to explain the key differences between the two products. And BattleKart does not accurately reflect the information. When compared to BattleKarts, the real-time experience is more valuable.

I would rate SentinelOne a seven out of ten.

We primarily use the solution for endpoint detection.

The solution works well in general.

It's a small size and offers an easy deployment. It's very quick to deploy.

The solution is stable.

It's quite scalable.

Every site has its own key. I'm not sure how I can implement the key for the setup package. Therefore, with every installation, I need to do it manually and put on the site keys.

It is an expensive product. They could work on lowering the price a bit.

I've used the solution for one year.

It is stable and reliable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze.

The solution is quite scalable.

The initial setup and deployment are easy. I can get it up and running in five minutes.

The cost is a bit high. It's around $8 per client per month.

We are partners. We are using the latest version of the product.

I'd recommend the solution to others. We really like it in general.

I'd rate the solution a nine out of ten.

This is an anti-malware and threat management product. We are customers of SentinelOne and I'm a system engineer.

We chose SentinelOne because of the protection it offers against ransomware. It provides good security that gives peace of mind.

We sometimes have issues with the disc space and that's because of the anti-ransomware technology they use. The volume of shadow copies becomes too large and we have to manage that. 

I've been using this solution for two years. 

This is a stable product. 

The solution is scalable, we have around 500 users in the company. 

I have issued some tickets to technical support and they were very responsive. 

Positive

We use an in-house person along with a third-party consultant for implementation.

I believe that SentinelOne is quite an expensive solution. 

This is a good product, but it has some issues so I rate it eight out of 10. 

My client uses the solution for endpoint security and email security.

I have found the most valuable feature to be the rapid threat detection. 

We need to analyze the threats and make decisions based on that, so the analytics could be better at analyzing exactly where the threats are coming from.

One of my clients has been using the product for about three years.

My client has said that it is stable. 

It is a scalable solution.

We received a response from technical support within 48 hours. The support is great.

I would rate this solution as an eight out of ten.

We use SentinelOne as an endpoint protection solution.

The overall integration functionality for this solution could be improved. 

I have been using this solution for three years. 

This is a scalable solution.

The customer support for this solution is good.

The initial setup is straightforward.

I would recommend that anyone considering using this solution first understand exactly how this solution works and what their business needs. 

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.