SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint Reviews

It is used in my customer's companies. It handles incident management, firewall implementation, and device control.

The most valuable feature is the rollback. 

Remediation is great. 

The ranger feature for work devices is most useful.

The reporting part is awesome.

It is easy to deploy the product. 

It should not limit itself to EDR. I need some other solutions to integrate into it. It should give us more visibility by integrating other solutions with it.

I want some other solutions like email security. Email security should also integrate with it to get more visibility on it.

Agent upgrades might cause some issues. Most of the time, an agent gets removed after it is not communicating with the server. After every three months, it will get automatically removed. That might cause an issue.

The solution is expensive. It is costlier than Trend Micro and Palo Alto XDR.

I've used the solution for around six months.

The solution is stable. We've found the performance to be good. It's light. There are no bugs or glitches. 

We have 1500 users on the solution right now. It is pretty scalable. 

With technical support, I've got an immediate response, and when I log a ticket, I get good assistance. 

I had worked on Palo Alto XDR as well. However, the remediation is not so good. There is no option with the rollback as well. That might cause data loss during a ransomware attack.

I'm also aware of the Trend Micro solution. 

It's easy to set up and has a very lightweight agent. It's very easy to deploy.

The time it takes to deploy all depends upon the number of uses, the number of clients, which machines are there, et cetera. In the Ranger, you have options. If you have advanced features for deployment, Ranger deployment, it is easy.

The solution is a bit pricey and they should look at the costs involved. You have to pay extra for certain features, such as the Ranger feature. Everything should be included in the subscription. 

We are partners. 

It's a good solution as compared to others. In terms of MML features, it is fine.

I'd rate it eight out of ten. 

We primarily use the solution at our endpoints. We use it for security.

It's catching a lot of malicious and suspicious threats. That's good for us. 

We are able to write some custom rules on SentinelOne.

The setup is simple. 

Right now, the solution meets our needs. We do not need anything added to it. 

Maybe they can develop some firewall aspects for it to better protect us. If they did that, we can write a lot of rules for the firewall and custom rules.

I've been using the solution for about two years. 

The solution is stable and reliable. It catches a lot of malicious and suspicious threats. There are no bugs or glitches and it doesn't crash or freeze. 

The solution scales well and can work across platforms. We can use it with MacOS, Linux, and Windows Servers. You can use it with everything.

We have 600 people on the solution right now. It is used throughout the company.

We may increase usage in our company. 

Technical support is great. They are very responsive. For example, today, if I open a ticket, they will likely give me an answer in 24 hours.

Positive

I used FireEye and Symantec. However, SentinelOne is better than them. It's more flexible and catches more threats. 

We found the initial setup to be very simple. You just click through, and you're up and running. 

I'd rate it five out of five in terms of ease of deployment.

We're deploying it every month. SentinelOne sends updates every month and we action them. 

Licensing is paid on a yearly basis. I can't speak to the exact pricing. 

I'm not sure which version number we are currently on. 

If a company has a lot of people and needs to protect its many endpoints, this is a great option.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. 

It runs continuously and uses AI to look for any suspicious activity. If it does determine that there is a virus or something going on that shouldn't be happening, it not only stops the process but also completely logs the whole function. It tells you in a map version how the attack happened and how it was stopped. It is brilliant. In the past, for example, if I had the same problem in Webroot, I would've had to submit the case to Webroot for viewing so that they could, as a human, literally determine what the cause was, but by that time, it is way too late, whereas, this is the real-time protection.

It protects your machine, and it does an excellent job using AI to determine an attack and stop the attack. Its most powerful feature is prevention, and it can unwind ransomware activity as well. So, it is a really useful product in that sense.

There is the ability to SSH into a machine even if the machine has been disconnected from the network. When a real hazard happens, SentinelOne disconnects it from the internet so that no more transactions can occur, but I still have access to the machine. One of the bigger benefits is that no harm could be done because there is no communication with the internet, but I still have the ability to go in, restart a machine, do some investigations, and make some things happen.

One of the things they could do is extend the product range to include Android and iPhone so that you could have the app on your phone as well. There is probably something going on there with that, but that's something that they're lacking at the moment. For instance, if I was to have to recommend a client to protect their phone, I'd have to recommend Norton or something else. I don't have an answer within the SentinelOne solution.

I have been using this solution for close to three years.

It is perfect. I've seen very few problems related to the app. It is not using too much of the PC's power. It does not make PCs slower. So, I find it the best of both worlds. You reduce the impact of the product on the user, but at the same time, thoroughly protect the user, no matter what he does.

You can certainly have thousands of SentinelOne users. We have 250 users. In terms of our plans to increase its usage, I provide IT as a service. So, as I add clients, I always add licenses for those clients.

Their support is very good. I would rate them a five out of five.

Positive

It was straightforward. It probably took me a week to get 250 machines converted.

It can be done in-house very easily. You probably need one staff member that knows how to implement it, and after that, it pretty much runs itself. It requires very little maintenance.

It is not sold as a consumer product. It is only sold based on the number of licenses. So, as an MSP, you're probably going to pay about three and a half dollars per license, per month to have SentinelOne.

I would advise others to go for it. It is great. As an MSP, the peace of mind it gives me is really significant. While the cost of SentinelOne is higher than Webroot, the reality is that the peace of mind and the knowledge that you are probably not going to get a complete attack, simply because SentinelOne stepped in and stopped it, is worth every penny.

I would rate it a ten out of ten. It is absolutely fantastic.

We use SentinelOne to collect logs and data. We will connect it to other tools and places in the future.

It is easy to collect and retain logs with SentinelOne. When you need to compare information, the data is available. It also has the possibility to configure information. It integrates well with all the other solutions we use. 

The only concern we have is that there are a few features that were not readily available. We use a lot of application files that didn't have a connection.

We would also like to see integration with other tools that have to collect the logs.

Although Microsoft claims the use of building artificial intelligence to correlate events, we have actually had a couple of events that should have logs but did not. The solution is not at the same level in terms of building artificial intelligence.

SentinelOne can do a better job of not only creating corrective action based on the correlation. For example, someone was trying to repeatedly change their password. What they didn't realize was that they weren't connected correctly.

I have been using SentinelOne for six months.

SentinelOne is a stable product.

Scalability is based on the measure. There is no limitation regarding scalability if you pay for the upgrades.

Technical support is good. When you need help from Microsoft, there is a long list of resources to help understand the issues.

Positive

The initial setup is straightforward as we have contracts with Microsoft Office Supplies, commodities, defender, and Active Directory.

I would rate the ease of initial setup of SentinelOne a five out of five. It is easy.

Our company used a third party that provided the utility. 

This solution is less expensive than its competitors. You might need to buy additional space depending on how much they are willing to provide. I would rate the pricing a five out of five.

We selected SentinelOne because it was less expensive than the competitors. We also saw the speed of evolution with Microsoft, so it can be involved theoretically when compared to Splunk.

We also chose SentinelOne because of the balance between features. It is stable and has enough choices. Being with Microsoft, we felt confident that the solution would evolve.

If you are considering SentinelOne, you should consider the cost of storage. Otherwise, the product is easy to deploy. You either need to have your own security operating center or hire someone that will use Sentinel or the secondary service. For you to consume the data, you may have had an internal security center or Sentinel.

With SentinelOne you have to invest extra cost. You have to always think of how much it will cost you to delay a response by a couple of days. If the incident is going to cost two days of revenue for the organization, that is much more than the cost of the solution.

I would rate SentinelOne an eight out of ten because of the price point and the features you get. 

We use SentinelOne daily for endpoint protection and restriction on using USB devices. 

The protection and management provided by SentinelOne is good.

I would like to see the reports from SentinelOne more customizable, as there are very few options.

I have been using SentinelOne for four months. I work as a senior network security engineer.

The management of SentinelOne is easy, it does not put too much burden on the machine. We will be upgrading to Windows 11 in the upcoming months, we will be able to better comment on stability after that.

Our organization has close to 3,000 machines with approximately 2,000 users. It is easy to scale.

We were using McAfee prior to SentinelOne. McAfee has a wide range of reports and is more customizable than SentinelOne. We switched from McAfee because we were no longer satisfied with the support they provided. They were no longer providing prompt responses, tickets were taking too long to get resolved.

The other reason we switched was that McAfee was a traditional antivirus working on a definition basis. They have not moved on to the next generation of antivirus. McAfee needs to focus on the behavior of the program and machine files. If you want this, you need to choose a different McAfee product. They were not putting everything in one place, but rather offering a buffet of offerings, driving the cost up.

The initial setup of this solution was simple. We did the setup ourselves, but did require a little help from the vendor.

I would give SentinelOne a four out of five for ease of setup.

The deployment of SentinelOne is easy. If you calculate the installation of the product and make all the packages ready, it takes about a week. Implementation was another month to go through and replace the older systems and install the new ones.

The pricing of SentinelOne is less than McAfee.

I would advise anyone looking to implement SentinelOne to look before you set up. Know how many machines are working in your network and which type of communication they are doing, whether it is internal or on the internet. No matter what solution you pick if it is SentinelOne, Carbon Black, McAfee, or Symantec check the usage of your machines.

I would rate SentinelOne a nine out of ten overall.

We use the solution for anti-malware, policy enforcement, and blocking USBs, for example. It's used for detection in general, and for protection and threat blocking.

The solution is very straightforward to set up. 

The features are great. It is excellent for detection and device blocking.

The network control has been useful, as well as the firewall control. 

The solution is both stable and scalable. 

The inventory is a good feature. However, it's not up to date. The delay in updating inventory is ten minutes. If it can be improved, it will help a lot. 

For the general IT management, there is a need to correlate the software version from inventory with the CVE information. For example, we have the CVE, however, it doesn't take into account the current version. We need it to stay up to date with the latest version. 

I've used the solution for less than one year.

The solution is quite stable. It's reliable. There are no bugs or glitches. 

The product can scale very well. 

We have less than 50 people on the solution currently. We are using it in a smaller environment.

We do have plans to increase usage in the future. We are, in fact, still deploying it. So the department is not finished yet.

We get technical support from the vendor. 

I've also used Microsoft Defender.

It offers an easy implementation process. It's not overly complex or difficult. Setting everything up on the cloud is simple. The deployment was done in a matter of days. In the end, it took less than a week. We had two people handle the deployment process. 

We did have some outside assistance. They helped with half of the process. 

We found the ROI to be quite high. However, it would vary, depending on the contract. It's a good investment. I'd give it a five out of five.

I cannot speak to the exact pricing. That said, it's very reasonable. I'd rate it five out of five in terms of affordability. There are cheaper options; however, it is quite affordable. We pay a yearly licensing fee. 

We are a customer and end-user. We deal with a SentinelOne partner. 

I can't speak to which version we are using.

Whether or not the solution would work for an organization depends on the environment and other factors. That said, we are very satisfied with the product overall. 

I'd rate the solution ten out of ten.

We are using it for endpoint security. It acts as an antivirus as well as is useful for endpoint detection. We are using the same product for both use cases. 

SentinelOne is very lightweight. It doesn’t consume much memory of endpoints. Endpoints don't hang, and machine performance doesn’t get impacted. Their technical support is also very nice.

It has all the features that other leading products in the market provide. They should keep enhancing it based on the challenges in the market. I am fine with its detection capability, but they can work more on deep inspection.

I have been using this solution for around two years.

It is stable. I would rate it a four out of five in terms of stability.

It is scalable. I would rate it a four out of five in terms of scalability. We have more than 1,200 users who are using this solution.

Their technical support is very nice. I would rate them a five out of five.

Positive

It is very easy to implement or install. I would rate it a five out of five in terms of the ease of setup. It does require maintenance by someone.

Its cost is yearly. It is not much costlier than other leading products available in the market. I would rate it a four out of five in terms of pricing.

We were looking for an antivirus and EDR solution. We evaluated some of the products, and finally, we decided to go for SentinelOne EDR. CrowdStrike was one of the solutions we evaluated. SentinelOne was lightweight, but CrowdStrike had a more secure door.

I would rate it a nine out of ten.

I use it for company computers in reference to end-point protection scanning for malware, hunting for malware on the network, and on the devices. 

One is the behavioral engine and the AI are both built into the agent, so it doesn't need the internet. 

The interface is good and it is easy to use. The engine that they use to look for malware and for viruses is very good. 

There are features that I would like them to add. They have little to do with endpoint protection, but if they could add encryption and DLP on, it would make it even better. 

I have been working with SentinelOne for just over a year now.

Yeah, it is stable. It does not use a lot of computer resources, even though the engine is built into the agent. If there are new updates, it alerts you when the updates are there and need to be installed. SentinelOne is an efficient solution.

Yes, it is scalable.

I have not had any issues that I needed to talk to customer support about.

The initial setup is very straightforward and easy. Once you install it, auto-updates are initialized. When you put in watches, you are searching for items, you need customization, and you add or remove rules, which is quite easy.

I use in-house implementation.

We are seeing a return on our investment.

The licensing is okay. I don't think it is bad. Depending on which one you get, I think it is fifty dollars for each user annually. The more users you have, the cheaper it is.

I use all security tools from SIMS to DAMs, to DLP solutions, firewalls, etc.

For me, the experience has been very good. I would rate SentinelOne a nine out of ten.

We use SentinelOne mainly for lateral movement, ransomware, anti-malware, AI engine, and forensics.

The most valuable features of SentinelOne are the lateral movement and the use of the Active Directory.

SentinelOne can improve by having better integration with Active Directory.

SentinelOne can be deployed on-premise and in the cloud.

I have been using SentinelOne for approximately two years.

SentinelOne is stable. However, the only issue I had was with legacy system, such as older kernels. The newer systems are more stable.

The scalability of SentinelOne is good, but my biggest concern is they need to find some way to automatically install their agents to specifically Microsoft Windows devices because not every IT infrastructure has SECM of others that automatically deploy it. It would be helpful during the migration of new customers.

We have approximately 4,000 systems using the solution and plan on adding another 400.

I haven't had the opportunity to interact with SentinelOne support.

I have previously used Microsoft Windows Defender.

The initial setup of SentinelOne is very easy. You only need to turn it on and it starts working with a couple of clicks. The ease of implementation is SentinelOne strongest feature.

We have three people deploying SentinelOne. As part of the team deploying the agent, there are multiple teams involved, and each one can deploy an agent when they have their own time.

SentinelOne can cost approximately $70 per device.

The advice I would give others that are thinking of implementing SentinelOne is if they have any other solutions, I would highly recommend them to start using it, especially if they have Active Directory. It's very good at picking up weird anomalies.

I  rate SentinelOne an eight out of ten.

The most important feature is the roll-back feature because when any system is corrupted, we can easily restore it within a few seconds. Also, if an end-user is not connected to your network, they can communicate with the central manager. We can be notified of any end-user activity with a central dashboard. The solution is also a very lightweight agent model compared to other solutions like Sophos, Carbon Black and the app action from X-microsite product. SentinelOne does not use the RAM SCP installation for the agent, and the user interface is also straightforward.

The setup process could be improved, and it would be good if artificial intelligence were added as an additional feature in the next release.

We used SentinelOne at my previous company before I left eight months ago, and it was deployed on cloud base.

It is a stable solution.

It is a scalable solution, and we have about 800 users using SentinelOne. We only need one person for maintenance, and they can offer maintenance in person and remotely via email and SMS.

I rate the technical support a ten out of ten. The support is very easy if you connect with global support. A company focused on non-technical issues can't easily adopt the solution. You have a support team from the layman language.

The initial setup was a bit complex but very simple if you set up a single order.

I rate the price of SentinelOne a ten out of ten, meaning it is the best price in the market. This is because SentinelOne has a nominal cost. For example, if CrowdStrike costs $1000, SentinelOne provides the same features for about $7 to $8.

I rate this solution a ten out of ten. I have around 10 to 15 years of experience in security and have used products like Sophos, Micro and CrowdStrike. CrowdStrike and SentinelOne are the best, but SentinelOne is preferred because of its great features and nominal cost.