Consultant at a tech consulting company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Reduced costs by reducing amount of servers
For how long have you used this solution? - 1 year
Which features are most valuable? - Live migration
Can you give an example of how this solution has improved the way your organization functions? -We where able to reduce the amount of servers. This has reduced our costs significantly.
What areas of this solution have room for improvement? - The interface is sometimes not logical and previous versions where not so stable but luckily this has been mostly resolved.
Did you encounter any issues with deployment, stability or scalability? If so, please describe. - Stability and bugs in previous 2.x versions
Did you previously use a different solution and if so, why did you switch? - No this was our first virtual platform
Before choosing this solution, did you evaluate other options? If so, which ones? - The choice was clear for us; it had to be open-source with commercial support
How would you rate the level of customer service and technical support? - The support we got so far from redhat as customers was great. You would probably not get better elsewhere
Was the initial setup straightforward or complex? In what ways? - Straightforward. Yes there is a great guide online at redhat on how to install this
Did you implement it in-house or through a vendor team? If through a vendor, how would you rate their work? - We installed it in-house as we are reseller and integrator
What is your ROI on this solution? - There is no investment in this product. As a reseller we can use it to test for free we pay every year a fixed cost as partner.
What was your original setup cost for this solution and what is your day-to-day cost of using it? - Free for us
What advice would you give to others looking into this solution? - I would say give it a look if you are looking for a virutalization platform. Most of the things can be done with rhev and the cost is much lower then with other commercial solutions. Since version 3 this product is mature and since version 3.1 most glitches where removed.
Disclosure: The company I work for is partners with several vendors (including Red Hat) - http://www.open-future.be/solutions/partners
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
RHEV 3.2 is Quite Stable, Unlike Previous Versions
I am very pleased to say that I like Red Hat in many ways because of their innovations,working on new technology and improving day by day bringing it upto the expectations of customers with premium support available through out at all time. RHEV was launched as a web portal based access of virtual machines throughout the network which is used in organizations for different purposes with all virtualization features available today; earlier they were having problems with the product but now RHEV 3.2 is quite stable.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Is there any limit on number of virtual machines on RHEV?
Buyer's Guide
RHEV
January 2026
Learn what your peers think about RHEV. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: January 2026.
880,844 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Infrastructure Expert at a tech company with 51-200 employees
RHEV is excellent due to cost, performance and security.
Valuable Features:
RHEV costs are very low compared to other Virtualization products. RHEV hypervisor supports up to 160 cores and up to 2 TB of RAM on a host machine. Performance and security are key advantages of RHEV. One of the new features are transparent huge pages, where kernel dynamically creates large memory pages for virtual machines, which improves performance for most workloads by reducing the number of times that memory is accessed. It is open source, which means that it is available for use by every one. There is a “Power user portal” feature that helps developer and IT staff with a self-service interface that allows them to provision virtual machines, define templates, and be an administrator to their own environment.
Room for Improvement:
You need to buy support from red hat and you need to renew support every year in order to keep getting support from red hat. Some features are unavailable compared to leading visualization products. RHEV hyper-visor came later into the market than other leading visualization product.
Other Advice:
RHEV hyper visor is a cost effective solution for virtualization. Its work on kernel base virtualization systems. Its usage keep growing in the market.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Very good information about how many logical and virtual CPU can be supported on different types of virtualization. However, could you please guide us where there are any significant better performances or bottlenecks when the number of CPUs are quite large.
Senior Manager of Data Center at a integrator with 51-200 employees
One of the best open source virtualization techniques with enhanced security, performance, and cost advantage
Valuable Features:
Few pros of Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Hypervisor are-
1) Kernel based virtual machine(KVM) virtualization technology
2) Good application compatibility and interface
3) Memory page sharing
4) NIC bonding
5) Multipath I/O
6) Efficient guest consolidation, live migration and HA
7) SELinux for enhanced security
Room for Improvement:
Few cons of Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Hypervisor are1) Need to create virtual machine environment per node
2) Issues with clustering
3) Load balancing not very efficient and fails to utilize and distribute network resources.
Other Advice:
Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Hypervisor is an enterprise virtualization solution made by Red Hat. It has been designed for intergration with Virtualization manager with servers. It has robust virtualization management features with proven enterprise security and performance. This Hypervisor is basically based on Kernel Based Virtual Machine. It has inbuilt features such as live migration, high availability (which manages server availability), and zero downtime for the virtual machines.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
We are using Redhat hypervisor for large organization - 50K plus. It is best virtualization solution we have used so far.
Owner at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
A scalable and cost-effective solution, but it should be made more user-friendly
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable feature of Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization is its pricing."
- "The solution should be made more user-friendly."
What is our primary use case?
We use the solution to deploy our OS.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature of Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization is its pricing.
What needs improvement?
The solution should be made more user-friendly.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working with Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization (RHEV) for five years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization is quite a stable solution.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization is a scalable solution. Many users are using Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization in our organization, and we plan to increase the number of users in the future.
How are customer service and support?
Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization's technical support is customer-friendly.
How was the initial setup?
Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization's initial setup is straightforward and much easier.
What other advice do I have?
Two engineers are required to deploy and maintain Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization.
Overall, I rate Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization a six out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Partner
Buyer's Guide
Download our free RHEV Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: January 2026
Product Categories
Server Virtualization SoftwarePopular Comparisons
VMware vSphere
Hyper-V
Proxmox VE
KVM
Nutanix AHV Virtualization
Oracle VM VirtualBox
Oracle VM
Citrix XenServer
VMware ESXi
DxEnterprise
Buyer's Guide
Download our free RHEV Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- What are the differences between RHEV and VMware vSphere?
- When evaluating Server Virtualization Software, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- VMware ESXi or VMware Workstation?
- VMware vs. Hyper-V - Which do you prefer?
- How does VMware ESXi compare to alternative virtualization solutions?
- Which hypervisor provides the best network performance at 10gb or higher?
- VMware has been positioned in the Leaders Quadrant of Gartner’s Magic Quadrant for four years. Agree/Disagree? Why?
- Which is the best server virtualization solution?
- Oracle VM vs. latest VMWare?
- Which virtualization platform would you recommend to a healthcare company with 1000-5000 employees?











Patrik, I do not think you are allowed to use NFR licenses for production.