Our primary use case is to run Oracle databases and to monitor them. It can do everything.
Systems Engineer at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
Compared to other monitoring products the user interface is very clear but the setup is very complex
Pros and Cons
- "Compared to other monitoring products, the user interface is very clear. It sends clear notifications."
- "The on-premises installation is complex. It should be easier, especially for deploying agents that are running on a Windows machine that is running Oracle databases. It's very complex. Linux based machines aren't so complicated but it's complex for Windows."
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
Compared to other monitoring products the user interface is very clear. It sends clear notifications.
What needs improvement?
The on-premises installation is complex. It should be easier, especially for deploying agents that are running on a Windows machine that is running Oracle databases. It's very complex. Linux based machines aren't so complicated but it's complex for Windows.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control for over a year.
Buyer's Guide
Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control
May 2025

Learn what your peers think about Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2025.
857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I haven't had any issues with stability or scalability.
How are customer service and support?
Oracle support is always good.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I don't handle sales but I know that it's very expensive, especially when it comes to support.
What other advice do I have?
I would rate it a seven out of ten.
Not a ten because no product is a ten. It has everything that I need. It gives me some problems with the deployment. The initial deployment should be more simple.
If you have a lot of Oracle infrastructure, I would recommend this solution. My advice would be to read a lot of documentation about the deployment. Get an expert to help with the deployment. It can be very complex with an enterprise manager. It can be a waste of time trying to figure out all of the features.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Hybrid Cloud
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: partner

Database Administrator at a insurance company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Good threat detection, but the solution needs to improve real-time monitoring
Pros and Cons
- "We have been satisfied with technical support."
- "There is a lack from the point of view of monitoring on the system. The performance of the system and its resources are things that I think can be improved. There needs to be real-time monitoring available on the solution."
What is our primary use case?
We use the solution strictly for monitoring.
What is most valuable?
The real-time threat detection has been the most valuable feature.
What needs improvement?
There is a lack from the point of view of monitoring on the system. The performance of the system and its resources are things that I think can be improved. There needs to be real-time monitoring available on the solution.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using the solution for two years.
How are customer service and technical support?
We have been satisfied with technical support.
How was the initial setup?
We installed in our repository with the agent. We installed on-premises and with an agent deployment.
What other advice do I have?
We use the on-premises deployment model.
I would rate this solution seven out of ten.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Buyer's Guide
Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control
May 2025

Learn what your peers think about Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: May 2025.
857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
MACS Snr CP, Senior Oracle Consultant at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Proactively monitors every server before a problem happens with patch management
Pros and Cons
- "Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control gives us diverse monitoring capability that can be extremely powerful."
- "The product does have room for improvement in patch management."
What is our primary use case?
Managing deliveries is our primary use case: Oracle servers, Oracle networking, delivery receipts, applications, Tomcat/Apache, host machines, and checking the host data center.
How has it helped my organization?
Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control has improved our organization in many ways:
- Before implementing this solution, the patching was done manually. Now, we do the same task with patching management.
- Before, we used to monitor every server every day. Now, we don't have to monitor it, because we have an in-place solution.
We get alerts from Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control. We can proactively monitor every server before a problem happens on it.
What is most valuable?
The accuracy is the most valuable feature for us. Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control gives us diverse monitoring tools, monitoring capability that can be extremely powerful, security patching, database consolidation, etc. all in one packaged distribution.
What needs improvement?
The product does have room for improvement in patch management. It is complex, but since the documentation is very much elaborated, we followed the documentation.
We were able to implement it by ourselves. We didn't have to ask the third-party implementers to come and implement it for us.
The deployment took around two days. The whole deployment, all the production servers (we have around three hundred servers), took around three months.
I would like to see more security features in Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control like application data integrity.
For how long have I used the solution?
We're using the plan for two years now.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is pretty good. This is very powerful. Oracle Cloud Control has the capability of not only managing Oracle products, but also Microsoft, IBM products, SharePoint, etc. Lots of solutions and applications come in this domain.
Oracle is managing all the different procedures of applications, deliveries, storage, network, and load-balancing. It is a complete data-center solution.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Right now we have a cluster node with two servers clustered. It has a database. This database is on a two-node server. We can scale it up to as many as we want.
Civil administrators, supervising administrators, network administrators, auditing administrators, managers, supervisors, security consultants, etc. are all using it.
We have in the Cloud Control every person assigned to a role. We have assigned a particular role to them: indoors administration, SharePoint administration, Exchange, etc.
Some are for the main controller. Some are Oracle admins, BI publishers, BI reporting tools, managers, etc. Every person has his/her role.
How are customer service and technical support?
I would evaluate the solution's technical support with a 7 out of 10. They are lacking. Sometimes I feel the engineers on Oracle support don't know as much as we know.
Maybe because we are using their product heavily or they're engineers who are working in Oracle support, but they don't have much breadth of knowledge in the product. What I've witnessed sometimes has surprised me. They don't know the product as much as we do. When the support goes through and the support call goes to the US, they are professional. When it comes through India, it's just terrible.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We switched due to the ease of control in managing productivity and administration. We were not using that solution as heavily as we are using Oracle Control now. It was the mobile Microsoft SCOM security package.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is complex but since the documentation is very much elaborated, we followed the documentation. We were able to implement it by ourselves. We didn't have to ask the third-party implementers to come and implement it for us.
The deployment took around two days for all the production servers. We have around three hundred servers, so it took around three months.
What about the implementation team?
I did the setup myself. We didn't have any integrator. We followed all of the documentation and I was the one who implemented all the solutions.
What was our ROI?
We have saved a lot of money on costs like wages, overtime, and manpower. The required hours were too high to maintain the servers previously.
We had lots of people maintaining the servers. Now, there are not many people needed. The company is saving a lot of money.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We had some indicators. We studied our environment. We have most of our production systems and applications on Oracle. Consequently, the Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control distro was well suited for us.
We use Oracle's product line. We know that it also supports the other products that we're using like Microsoft Exchange, SharePoint, web-controllers, Apache servers, etc.
We found Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control much more suitable for us than other products for storage, switches, net logs, F-5, etc.
What other advice do I have?
If people know their environment, they will know what product suits their business department and needs. If they are happier using Oracle applications or customer applications based in Java and Oracle products. Cloud Control is much better for us.
I would rate it an eight out of ten because I found it very helpful, proactive, and easy to manage I didn't give it 10, because of the support. I don't find the support very professional.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner.
Database Administrator at PagSeguro UOL
It eases administration, mainly regarding performance management and troubleshooting, if you have a considerable number of Oracle Databases
What is our primary use case?
We are very dependent on the product, since it eases Oracle database administration. Mostly, if you have a lot of databases in your DC.
How has it helped my organization?
It has helped us in the manner of productivity, since it enables us to monitor and manage a lot of databases in a centralized web portal.
What is most valuable?
Patching multiple databases
Performance monitoring
Management and optimization
Database administration
Alerts and thresholds
What needs improvement?
Stability and performance of the tool itself. Might be better used with more hardware. Normally the specifications from the docs are enough.
For how long have I used the solution?
Three to five years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Yes, there are some bugs. Some of the screens sometimes do not load data, and sometimes the portal hangs.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It has the ability to scale out the database and the OEM to more than one server.
How are customer service and technical support?
It is under the Oracle support agreement. I would rate it a nine out of 10.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Yes, we evaluated Spotlight from Dell (Quest), but we chose OEMCC, since it has more features and requires no direct licensing.
How was the initial setup?
I think it is a bit complex. You have to install and create an Oracle Database with a template for OEM, then you have to install and configure the OEM.
What about the implementation team?
We did it by ourselves.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
OEM requires no licensing, but if you want to use features like the performance monitoring page in your database, you must have the Diagnostic Pack license. If you want the tuning advisor, you have to license the Tuning Pack. The license you need is not for OEM, but for the Oracle Database.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We evaluated Spotlight from Dell (Quest).
What other advice do I have?
If you have a considerable number of Oracle Databases and they are very critical, I suggest you use this product. It eases administration, mainly regarding performance management and troubleshooting.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Database & Flexcube System Administrator at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
Enables me to create user profiles for all the instances that have the same profile
Pros and Cons
- "Using Enterprise Manager, I was able to create user profiles for all the instances that have the same profile. Secondly, it's easier to manage performance, to automate the AWR reports to run every half an hour, or hour. Then, if you have a performance issue you just open the report and you can see what was running the last one hour, the SQL statements, or what was causing the performance issues."
- "Of course, that you can manage and create the backup strategies from a central environment for all your environments, so you don’t have to do so on each database. You can set up the policy you want for each database, but you do it from a central environment."
- "Because all our banking infrastructure is based on Oracle, I’ve tried to register Enterprise Manager on the middleware level, let's say, WebLogic applications. But I cannot say that I can do all the administration from Enterprise Manager, that I can do from the WebLogic Admin Console. So, I think here it needs some improvement: Things that you can do on the WebLogic Admin Console, you should be able to do them on the Enterprise Manager, so you don’t have to log into the Admin Console."
- "Sometimes the alerts are coming a bit late, for example, an alert for the CPU. It depends on the threshold that you have, how long you want to check the CPU of the machine. I got some faulty alerts with Data Guard. I had stopped a synchronization for maintenance and then I re-synchronized Oracle Data Guard. It took some time to appear in Enterprise Manager and send me the right notification that Data Guard was up and running and synchronizing. I realized this because I went directly into the database to check the status of Data Guard, and it was telling me that it was running okay. But in Enterprise Manager, it needed some more time to update the interface."
What is our primary use case?
Our primary use is to administer the different databases we have, development, UATs, and production databases. We use it to have a central environment so we can make policies for all users; whether the passwords have expired or not.
The reason we have this is because before, let’s say I had 10 to 12 databases. I had to go to each server and log in to the enterprise manager, and do this job on each server. Another of our concerns that this helps us address is to get notifications regarding if the space is, let’s say, 80% used. In that case, I need it to send me a notification so I can maintain; or on the host level where our systems are, to have alert notifications regarding space or CPUs.
Our main use of Enterprise Manager is on the database level.
How has it helped my organization?
Using Enterprise Manager, I was able to create user profiles for all the instances that have the same profile. Secondly, it's easier to manage performance, to automate the AWR reports to run every half an hour, or hour. Then, if you have a performance issue you just open the report and you can see what was running the last one hour, the SQL statements, or what was causing the performance issues. And, of course, the alerts.
What is most valuable?
The most important, of course, is the monitoring feature, because we want to monitor the host and the databases.
Of course, that you can manage and create the backup strategies from a central environment for all your environments, so you don’t have to do so on each database. You can set up the policy you want for each database, but you do it from a central environment.
And, of course, the notifications, if the backup succeeded or not.
What needs improvement?
Because all our banking infrastructure is based on Oracle, I’ve tried to register Enterprise Manager on the middleware level, let's say, WebLogic applications. But I cannot say that I can do all the administration from Enterprise Manager, that I can do from the WebLogic Admin Console. So, I think here it needs some improvement: Things that you can do on the WebLogic Admin Console, you should be able to do them on the Enterprise Manager, so you don’t have to log into the Admin Console.
For how long have I used the solution?
One to three years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
No issues with stability, really.
Sometimes the alerts are coming a bit late, for example, an alert for the CPU. It depends on the threshold that you have, how long you want to check the CPU of the machine. I got some faulty alerts with Data Guard. I had stopped a synchronization for maintenance and then I re-synchronized Oracle Data Guard. It took some time to appear in Enterprise Manager and send me the right notification that Data Guard was up and running and synchronizing. I realized this because I went directly into the database to check the status of Data Guard, and it was telling me that it was running okay. But in Enterprise Manager, it needed some more time to update the interface. It doesn’t happen really often, that I get faulty alerts or late alerts.
Another example is when the database is down and then you start the database, it needs some time to load everything from the database. I don’t know if some maintenance can be done on the agent side that is installed on the database server. But the lack that I'm seeing might be from 20 seconds to two minutes. It depends.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I cannot think of any scalability issues.
How are customer service and technical support?
In general, we have experience with Oracle support. For some things they are giving us solutions quickly. For some other cases they need more time, but for Enterprise Manager specifically, I have never used Oracle support.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I used Oracle Grid Control 10 a few years ago, as a consultant, and it was very useful. So when I came here and we started having more and more environments, I said, “Okay, the only way to manage all these environments is to have Oracle Enterprise Manager." And it’s impressive how much better Oracle 13c is, how much improved it is over Oracle Grid Control 10.
How was the initial setup?
The installation, I think is, straightforward. It's not very, very complex.
You need some background on the order, what you have to install first and what second, and you need to check which versions of support that will be your back-end or WebLogic. But if you have a bit of background and you go through the main Oracle Database to get the versions that you need, I think there's no issue with installation.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
We are using the free version. We are not using any licensed packages of Enterprise Manager, so I’m not quite sure how much each package is. As I understand it, there are different plug-ins that you need to buy for Enterprise Manager, but I’m not sure how much they cost.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
The only solution I could think of was Oral Enterprise Manager because our infrastructure is based on Oracle.
What other advice do I have?
To implement, you need to have a good server with a reasonable CPU, and good RAM on the server. You need to check the configurations that need to be done on each database where you want to install the Oracle agent, so it will be automatic; you need to make some changes on the host, the host that you want to register. I don’t think there is anything else complex in order to do this.
I would rate this product an eight out of 10. To be a 10 it needs to be more viable for using it for middleware software.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Senior DBA at a media company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Quickly generates advice on how to improve a query's performance
Pros and Cons
- "One of the clearest examples is the agility of discovering processes/sessions that are burdening the database environment. With this agility, the DBA can more quickly verify this type of problem, in addition to checking locked sessions and not having to do several searches in views and tables of the data dictionary. The tool already does this for you in an agile way."
- "Another feature is the Resource Manager, where we can manage the consumption of resources of certain queries, separately in resource groups. Depending on the characteristics of the query, queries can be placed in groups that consume less database and hardware resources."
- "One of the things that can be improved is the quality of results generated by BI Publisher. They are somewhat confusing when it comes to analysis."
- "The installation steps are very complex and the documentation for them is very generic and does not make very clear the correct steps from the installation to the addition of the host and database."
- "Another point that can be improved is the agent instability in the monitored hosts, because sometimes an agent has to be resynchronized to recapture the information."
What is our primary use case?
The use case was the monitoring of the database, which included consumption of resources such as CPU, memory, processes, and I/O.
How has it helped my organization?
One of the clearest examples is the agility of discovering processes/sessions that are burdening the database environment. With this agility, the DBA can more quickly verify this type of problem, in addition to checking locked sessions and not having to do several searches in views and tables of the data dictionary. The tool already does this for you in an agile way.
We had a case where a particular DML command could not perform the required update command on a table, and in this case we saw, within a few minutes, that we had another session doing an exclusive lock on the table. It was caused by an index rebuild command without the "online" option, that marked it to be rotated daily.
What is most valuable?
I believe that one of the most valuable resources this tool has is the ability to check offending processes, which are burdening the hardware resources, and to generate advice quickly that can improve a query's performance.
Another feature is the Resource Manager, where we can manage the consumption of resources of certain queries, separately in resource groups. Depending on the characteristics of the query, queries can be placed in groups that consume less database and hardware resources.
There are others features as well, such as AWS and ASH report which, in Enterprise Manager, are generated in a more agile way, and with a more friendly interface, helping to detect abnormalities in the database.
What needs improvement?
One of the things that can be improved is the quality of results generated by BI Publisher. They are somewhat confusing when it comes to analysis.
Another point is in the installation of the product. The installation steps are very complex and the documentation for them is very generic and does not make very clear the correct steps from the installation to the addition of the host and database.
Another point that can be improved is the agent instability in the monitored hosts, because sometimes an agent has to be resynchronized to recapture the information.
For how long have I used the solution?
More than five years.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
IT Administrator at a insurance company with 501-1,000 employees
Provides very useful insights for application and database performance tuning
Pros and Cons
- "The solution provides very useful insights for application and database performance tuning. We were able to do away with guess work in determining where the bottlenecks were in application performance."
- "Advisors provide quick access to Insight and best practice information for performance tuning and configuration."
- "Oracle Data Guard monitoring: There are no alerts for redo log transport failure."
What is our primary use case?
- Database performance tuning
- Weblogic server diagnostics
- Proactive monitoring and alerts for full Oracle infrastructure
How has it helped my organization?
The solution provides very useful insights for application and database performance tuning. We were able to do away with guess work in determining where the bottlenecks were in application performance.
What is most valuable?
- Central management of Oracle infrastructure for more efficient administration
- Advisors provide quick access to Insight and best practice information for performance tuning and configuration.
What needs improvement?
Oracle Data Guard monitoring: There are no alerts for redo log transport failure.
For how long have I used the solution?
One to three years.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Database & Flexcube System Administrator at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
Makes it is easier to manage your backups and create email alerts regarding the status of your backups
Pros and Cons
- "You can create a system group (database, application, and web server), so you can monitor performance as a system."
- "It is easier to manage your Oracle Database backups and create email alerts regarding the status of your backups (Succeeded or Failed)."
- "When registering a host, only if your host is running Linux will you get all the information which is available on EM. It would be nice if in future releases to include IBM AIX (primarily) and Microsoft Windows (secondly)."
- "You cannot use Enterprise Manager as replacement for a WebLogic console."
What is our primary use case?
Primary use case was to have a central web interface where we could administrate all Oracle Database instances.
After installing, I found out that it is not only a database administration console. You could manage hosts, middleware apps (WebLogic), and many more plugins, which are available to download for other vendors' software and databases.
Our banking environment is based on Oracle Databases (11.2.0.4) and our banking software is Oracle FLEXCUBE (12.0.3), which is running on WebLogic (10.3.6). In total, I have about 15 databases registered in Cloud Control and four to five WebLogic consoles, all of which are self-monitored from Oracle Cloud Control 13C monitoring software, and configured to send an email alert when a metric threshold is triggered.
I have registered a testing Microsoft SQL Server environment, but I did not find it very useful (it cannot be used as an alternative or as SQL Server Management Studio).
How has it helped my organization?
Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control has been really useful for our organisation. Before Enterprise Manager, I had 15 different database consoles with no centralised monitoring or alerting system. With EM, it has been easier to monitor all DB errors. For example, it is possible to register your My Oracle Support account, so when you get an error, it will automatically search for a document in My Oracle Support.
Also, you can create a system group (database, application, and web server), so you can monitor performance as a system.
What is most valuable?
Host-based monitoring is a big advantage of Enterprise Manager.
Now, with EM, it is easier to manage your Oracle Database backups and create email alerts regarding the status of your backups (Succeeded or Failed). I know when a target is up or down (this can be an Oracle Database instance, Listener, WebLogic Server, or even a deployment in the WebLogic Server).
What needs improvement?
When registering a host, only if your host is running Linux will you get all the information which is available on EM. It would be nice if in future releases to include IBM AIX (primarily) and Microsoft Windows (secondly).
When you register a WebLogic server (in our case WebLogic 10.3.6), you can actually do certain things. You cannot use Enterprise Manager as replacement for a WebLogic console.
For how long have I used the solution?
One to three years.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
No different solution was used before.
How was the initial setup?
If you read the prerequisites from My Oracle Support, then installation is straightforward even without the manual. What you need to understand is what to install first, then second.
What about the implementation team?
The implementation was done in-house.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I did not evaluate other options because our core banking system is based on Oracle.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.

Buyer's Guide
Download our free Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: May 2025
Product Categories
Cloud ManagementPopular Comparisons
VMware Aria Automation
VMware Aria Operations
AWS Control Tower
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- When evaluating Cloud Management solutions, what aspects of it are the most important to look for?
- Scalr vs BMC CLM
- What is the difference between a multi-cloud vs hybrid cloud management platform?
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of on-premise solutions vs cloud-hosted environment?
- Which cloud IaaS/PaaS platform would you recommend learning to a newbie?
- What is Unified Cloud Security? Can you define the scope and use cases of the term?
- vCloud Director versus HP Operations Orchestration?
- What are Pros and Cons of Cloud-based Patch Management?
- How to host/use WhereScape RED on cloud?
- What are your recommended best practices and tools to prevent cloud jacking in your organization?