The product is stable.

I rate the solution’s stability a nine out of ten.

NetApp made the NetApp storage system, and they made the NetApp SnapCenter for their storage systems. So the compatibility is not in question, actually. And, it would impact stability. 

It's truly compatible and it's really good, built for NetApp. So I would rate it nine point nine.

NetApp SnapCenter is a very stable solution.

It's very stable. Once it was in place and we had confirmation from your backup targets, the only issue we saw was due to a .NET upgrade on the client. That was fixable on the Microsoft side.

It is stable. I haven't heard anything from our operating teams that it was not working.

I rate the platform’s stability a ten out of ten. It is a very stable product.

The solution is very stable. We haven't really experienced any bugs or glitches. I can't recall the product crashing or freezing. The reliability is pretty good in terms of performance.

It is stable. We don't have any issues with SnapCenter.

It is very stable. But if you have a bigger Microsoft environment, there are issues sometimes mostly caused by MS updates.

Other than the bugs I mentioned it has been stable.

If nothing changes it works fine. But we faced some issues twice after we upgraded to next SnapCenter release. One time Vmware was affected and one time it was Oracle on Linux. Before update procedure, you should test any new release properly in a test environment!

The stability has been good.

Now, the stability is good. The first release was not very stable, but now it's okay.

Normally, it's very stable. We don't have a lot of issues with it. We once had a case where everything looked good, all the services were running, but we were not able to access the management console. We still don't know, up to today, why there was this problem. The page was blank. Then, a few days later it just started to work again. That was a bit strange. But usually, it's very stable.

I haven't had any issues with its stability. I had issues with the underlying virtual machine, but as far as SnapCenter itself goes, it has been reliable.

It's a good product. There should have been more thought put into it before it went live, because when the DBAs are so used to using SMO, it's obvious they're going to compare the two. If they're used to a function that SnapCenter doesn't have, that's an issue. Slowly but surely, it's getting the functions, but when it was presented to us we understood that it would just replace SMO as is, that we'd be able to do everything we needed to do. But we couldn't.

It's quite stable, but sometimes the stability seems to be endangered by the ecosystem itself and especially the OS updates. This is what we did experience from our side. But the demand for this piece of software is pretty slim among our customers. We have five or six customers using it. Since we support more than 400 customers, this is a pretty rare solution in our scope. But still, the stability seems to be fair.

The stability seems good.

I've had no problems with its stability. I haven't had to restart the server for any reason. Any failed backup that I've seen so far has not been related to SnapCenter. From what I've seen in the last year, it is pretty near bulletproof, as far as being able to run, once you set it up.

I would rate the stability at four out of five because it's a complicated product. In terms of integrating with systems and software, sometimes you need to watch your software versions and the changing environment. But that is its design, so there is nothing you can do about it.

It's stable. I haven't had any stability issues with it.

Sometimes it works fine, sometimes not. It depends on the complexity of the customer's environment.

So far, it's very stable, although I don't know what it's like for the end customer. From my side, it seems to be very stable.

SnapCenter is stable.

The solution is very stable.

I have not had any issues so far. It has been pretty stable.

Our ROBOs has told me that stability is good. However, we have been hit by bugs.