Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
PrinceKumar2 - PeerSpot reviewer
Associate Cloud Engineer at Rishabh Software
Real User
Top 5
Provides powerful data querying.
Pros and Cons
  • "MySQL gives us a very user-friendly workspace in which to query the database."
  • "We have encountered some performance issues, and the solution takes time for performing complex queries."

What is our primary use case?

We are developers working on different types of projects. We use relational databases in some projects and non-relational databases in others. When we use relational databases, we use MySQL. When we use non-relational databases, we use our DynamoDB or MongoDB.

What is most valuable?

  1. Ease of Use: MySQL is relatively easy to set up, configure, and manage, especially with tools like MySQL Workbench and command-line utilities. Its widespread popularity also means there is ample documentation, tutorials, and community support available for users.
  2. Open Source and Cost-effective: MySQL is open-source software, which means it is free to use and can be customized according to specific requirements. This makes it a cost-effective choice for startups, small businesses, and projects with budget constraints.

What needs improvement?

Compared to some other database systems, MySQL may have limitations in terms of advanced features and functionalities, especially when it comes to complex data relationships and transactions.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using MySQL for two years.

Buyer's Guide
MySQL
August 2025
Learn what your peers think about MySQL. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: August 2025.
866,561 professionals have used our research since 2012.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

In my past two years of MySQL experience, I found no bugs or breakdowns. It works completely fine.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Many cloud providers offers managed mysql service with scalable architecture ,automated backups , monitoring and scaling. Leveraging this can solve the scalability problem.

How was the initial setup?

MySQL is very easy to install and use.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

As it is an open source and there is community edition available so if you have small or medium use case it is much cheaper to use.

What other advice do I have?

Below are some thing to consider while working with mysql.

1. Regular maintenance 

2. Security consideration

3. Version compatibility

You can try MySQL if you have any use cases of relational databases. It is very easy for somebody to learn to use MySQL for the first time. The solution worked fine for me, with no breakdowns or scalability issues.

Overall, I rate MySQL eight and a half or nine out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Hybrid Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Senior Consultant at Tata Consultancy
Real User
Top 5
Enables a wide range of features and benefits, including high performance, scalability and security
Pros and Cons
  • "While MySQL offers strong basic functionality."
  • "MySQL lacks a feature akin to Oracle's Real Application Clusters, which ensures continuous database availability within the same data center or nearby data centers."

What is our primary use case?

We use it to meet the requirements of our customers while optimizing performance and reliability within the constraints provided.

How has it helped my organization?

The performance and scalability of our project have been influenced positively by MySQL. From what I've observed, performance has been satisfactory, and I haven't received any complaints from teams that have implemented it.

What is most valuable?

While MySQL offers strong basic functionality.

What needs improvement?

MySQL lacks a feature akin to Oracle's Real Application Clusters, which ensures continuous database availability within the same data center or nearby data centers. Without this capability, MySQL's suitability for mission-critical applications is diminished. Until MySQL incorporates a similar feature at the application level, its appeal for high availability remains limited. Historically, we've relied on external security measures for data protection, such as encryption. However, when encryption methodologies are employed within MySQL, there may be a slight performance degradation due to the computational overhead associated with processing large volumes of data in the database.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with it for twelve years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Stability is crucial, and it's influenced not just by the inherent features of the database system, but also by how the application team writes queries. If queries are poorly written or not optimized, it can affect stability significantly. While logging can help, improper usage, such as logging entire tables instead of specific fields, can also impact stability. Therefore, ensuring stability requires a holistic approach that considers both the database infrastructure and how the application interacts with it.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Scalability is not as straightforward with MySQL compared to Oracle. I would rate it seven out of ten. Our clientele typically includes small, medium, and enterprise-level businesses.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was straightforward. I would rate it nine out of ten.

What about the implementation team?

For the MySQL installation, it's crucial to have a broader understanding of the solution we're implementing. Sometimes, we may need to address OS-level issues, especially when dealing with OS-level addressing like OSFlow. In such cases, thorough testing at the voice level is essential to ensure a smooth installation process. Implementing MySQL in a single-node setup may uncover additional challenges that need to be addressed.

Typically, our focus is on implementing the product rather than the database or operating system level. While I oversee infrastructure aspects, the implementation process is heavily influenced by the specific application being deployed. From setting up voice-level deployment and alerting to handling licensing and the database infrastructure, this entire process usually takes four to six weeks, depending on the complexity of the functionality. Once we complete the initial deployment, subsequent enrollments become more streamlined, and the application is handed over for production use. Any further adjustments or configurations are managed separately.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The pricing falls within the moderate range. I would rate it four out of ten.

What other advice do I have?

Rather than recommending specific servers or operating systems, decisions are driven by how the application behaves and what functionalities it requires. This approach streamlines the process as pre-tested systems are already available, reducing the time and investment required for testing. Overall, I would rate it eight out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Partner
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
MySQL
August 2025
Learn what your peers think about MySQL. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: August 2025.
866,561 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Prince Barai - PeerSpot reviewer
Back End Developer at Agnos Inc.
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
Easy to use and can be used to store data
Pros and Cons
  • "MySQL is an easy-to-use solution that provides stability, reliability, flexibility, performance, security, and high availability."
  • "MySQL could introduce more indexing strategies."

What is our primary use case?

MySQL is an open-source relational database management system used to store data.

What is most valuable?

MySQL is an easy-to-use solution that provides stability, reliability, flexibility, performance, security, and high availability.

What needs improvement?

MySQL could introduce more indexing strategies. There are a couple of strategies where you can index things to be more searchable and visible. We lack that kind of functionality. For example, if your name is indexed correctly with a certain strategy, it can improve the search results faster. The solution’s interface could be improved.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using MySQL for my entire career.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

MySQL is a stable solution.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

MySQL is a scalable solution.

How was the initial setup?

The solution’s initial setup is easy.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

MySQL is a free and open-source solution.

What other advice do I have?

MySQL is deployed on the cloud in our organization. Big companies like Netflix, Uber, and Facebook use the solution. Since MySQL is an old product, many people might have faced similar issues, posted them online, and got a resolution. MySQL's performance and scalability features have supported our database growth.

New users can follow the documentation to use the solution, as it is straightforward. You need to be very clear about why you want to use the solution. MySQL is a relational database management system that cannot be used as a dynamic database management system.

MySQL is generally faster and more efficient than other relational database management systems. Hence, it is our preferred choice for applications that require high performance.

Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Ruhul Amin - PeerSpot reviewer
Executive Officer at Midland Bank Plc
Real User
Top 10
Robust relational database management system offering flexibility and efficient data management for diverse applications
Pros and Cons
  • "The installation process for the most scalable solution is remarkably quick, taking only a short amount of time."
  • "While utilizing a comparable algorithm, is noted to be sensitive, especially when configuring the inner device."

What is our primary use case?

We use it for building web applications and managing data.

How has it helped my organization?

It is quite efficient and performs well, especially when compared to MSCS. While traditional scaling methods can occasionally lead to slowdowns, I haven't encountered similar performance issues with MySQL scaling.

What is most valuable?

The installation process for the most scalable solution is remarkably quick, taking only a short amount of time. While restoration may theoretically take longer, I've achieved rapid setup with my system, often within a minute.

What needs improvement?

While utilizing a comparable algorithm, is noted to be sensitive, especially when configuring the inner device. If DCDR is not properly recovered from NDC, it can lead to system slowdowns. There is a need for enhancements in the InnoDB cluster, specifically the capability to support more than two nodes in MySQL. Additionally, the inclusion of data nodes would be a valuable improvement. For users new to the system, it might pose a bit of a learning curve.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with it for one year.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I would rate its stability capabilities eight out of ten.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I would rate the scalability eight out of ten.

How are customer service and support?

When facing support issues with your server, the level of assistance is generally high. However, in certain technical support instances, when issues are raised and a ticket is generated, the support team sometimes provides a link for further information. From a customer perspective, this approach is not ideal, especially when dealing with critical problems such as database downtimes. The expectation is for more direct and personalized support rather than reliance on knowledge-base resources in urgent situations.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I utilize Microsoft SQL Server (MSSQL) and MySQL for most of my databases. However, there are certain limitations in the new versions that impact support for certain functionalities. Due to these limitations, I have turned to MySQL as an alternative.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was straightforward. I would rate it eight out of ten.

What about the implementation team?

The deployment process, which took an hour, involves understanding various versions, especially the enterprise version, and confirming compatibility with the required features. Installation includes accessing the Oracle site, downloading MySQL, and dealing with complex considerations due to multiple business packages. Challenges may arise during the download of the DVD packet, requiring a careful assessment of the business needs for MySQL installation. The subsequent steps involve uploading MySQL VPN, reinstalling, and following a step-by-step approach, taking about five minutes. Despite the relatively swift deployment, managing dependencies and collecting necessary packets can be time-consuming and pose challenges for users. Maintenance requires only one person, especially if that person has knowledge of system administration. However, incorporating a software manager or other managing tools can be beneficial. Configuring and monitoring these tools doesn't necessarily require constant attention solely from the individual responsible for maintenance.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

It is an open source platform. While the free version of MySQL offers comprehensive features, it does come with limitations.

What other advice do I have?

Overall, I would rate it nine out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Kevin Honde - PeerSpot reviewer
Data Solution Architect at Econet Wireless Zimbabwe
Real User
Great cluster setup; works fine on the technical side
Pros and Cons
  • "The way that MySQL has improved my organization is that it comes free and also works fine on the technical side."
  • "The integration with other systems can be improved as can the integration between other databases."

What is our primary use case?

Our primary use case for MySQL is for our internally-built system. When our developers are doing the assistance, usually we provision them with the MySQL driver.

How has it helped my organization?

The way that MySQL has improved my organization is that it comes free and also works fine on the technical side.

What is most valuable?

The feature I found most valuable was the cluster setup.

What needs improvement?

The integration with other systems can be improved as can the integration between other databases. We have a workaround to integrate it with other systems but that can be improved.

In the next release, I would like to see better day-to-day support in case we face any issues.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using MySQL since 2008.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I would rate the stability of this solution an eight, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best. We have a team of three DBAs supporting and maintaining this product.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I would rate the scalability of this solution an eight, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best. I believe MySQL very scalable.

How are customer service and support?

I would rate the technical support an eight, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

How was the initial setup?

I would rate the initial setup process a nine, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best. I would say that this process has been quite easy.

The deployment of this solution was done by an in-house team and it took around 30 minutes to one hour.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

I would rate the pricing of this solution a two, on a scale from one to 10, with one being not expensive and 10 being very expensive.

What other advice do I have?

I would recommend this solution to other people.

Overall, I would rate MySQL solution a nine, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the worst and 10 being the best.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Ugur Demiriz - PeerSpot reviewer
Product Lifecycle Management Consultant at CPV industrial Solutions
Consultant
Top 10
Enhanced data handling and seamless integration for efficient project management
Pros and Cons
  • "The ML modules in MySQL are advantageous since they make data handling easy and quick at MNQM."
  • "MySQL has some unique exchange problems when it comes to migration projects."

What is our primary use case?

I have worked on migration projects between Power BI on Microsoft and SAP modules, which involve exchanging databases from Power BI on Microsoft to SAP modules. 

Additionally, I have been involved in integration projects as a MySQL developer using Oracle SQL databases.

How has it helped my organization?

MySQL has facilitated the migration projects to SAP modules from Microsoft Power BI, easing database exchange. The integration is smoother and more efficient, which has been beneficial for handling various projects.

What is most valuable?

The ML modules in MySQL are advantageous since they make data handling easy and quick at MNQM. I have a lot of experience with QA test sections on MySQL, and it aids in connecting with third-party programs effortlessly due to its adaptation capabilities.

What needs improvement?

MySQL has some unique exchange problems when it comes to migration projects. The product could improve in terms of security, though not necessarily when compared to Azure. It can be improved in areas related to database exchange during migration projects.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have five years of experience with MySQL.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

MySQL is stable and continuously improves concerning databases. It is advantageous for projects in this area.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Scalability in MySQL involves unique troubleshooting for every project that differs according to database exchanges. You can solve scalability issues easily if you possess strong SQL skills.

How are customer service and support?

Technical support from Oracle for MySQL is very good. They are really good at providing support.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I have experience with Oracle SQL and have not used Microsoft SQL. MySQL and PostgreSQL are the tools I currently work with.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup for MySQL took about one and a half hours, and only one person was required for the installation.

What was our ROI?

Cost-saving is not a significant concern, but focusing on project details is crucial. The project details provide exchangeable areas that can lead to cost savings.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The pricing for MySQL is slightly expensive, especially in unique projects for sectors like automotive and pharmaceuticals. Despite this, it is preferable for special projects due to its unique offerings.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I have experience with Oracle SQL and PostgreSQL.

What other advice do I have?

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Prashob Km - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Engineer / Team Lead at Techfriar
Real User
Top 20
Supports Laravel PHP framework, but we need to define every table beforehand
Pros and Cons
  • "MySQL is the best option for the Laravel PHP framework."
  • "In MySQL, we need to define every table beforehand."

What is our primary use case?

We use MySQL in multiple projects for storing, task management apps, and dating apps.

What is most valuable?

MySQL is the best option for the Laravel PHP framework. It supports multiple model systems, and it's very easy to call MySQL compared to other languages like MongoDB. I prefer MySQL for the Laravel PHP framework.

The solution's security features depend on where we host our server and database. We have some preventive measures to reduce attacks. We have taken authentication and only allow a particular IP address.

What needs improvement?

In MySQL, we need to define every table beforehand.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using MySQL for four to five years.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

In MySQL, we need to define every table beforehand. However, we don't need to do so in MongoDB. We can add a new row or column in MongoDB anytime, making it much easier. If you purchase MongoDB's plan, it supports many security features, and you don't need to check about security. They will handle everything.

How was the initial setup?

The solution’s initial setup is very easy. For the first time, the solution's implementation will take some time. However, you can use it multiple times after you configure it.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

MySQL is a cheap solution.

What other advice do I have?

Maintaining the database is a task. We take a weekly backup for each database so that we can upload it to the server if anything happens to the data. We created a cron job so that the data can be taken and then uploaded to a specific space so that we can go back to the particular big data whenever we want. I prefer MongoDB for scalability because it's much easier to maintain MongoDB.

Just one person is enough to maintain the solution. The solution has good documentation available on Google.

Overall, I rate the solution six and a half out of ten.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Data Analyst at KPMG East Africa
Real User
Top 10
Easy to manage, saves time, and provides good documentation
Pros and Cons
  • "SKIP LOCKED is a valuable feature."
  • "The full-text search feature must be improved."

What is our primary use case?

I use the solution for personal use cases like software development, mostly database bug systems.

How has it helped my organization?

I used the tool to build our website. It is used as a database to store information.

What is most valuable?

SKIP LOCKED is a valuable feature. It prevents us from deleting things we put in the database. It's mostly for background jobs in the software development site in MySQL 8. It is a new feature. The solution easily integrates with other tools and systems in our IT environment.

What needs improvement?

The full-text search feature must be improved.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using the solution for the past three weeks.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

I rate the tool’s stability an eight out of ten. We can create a database user schema. It's quite easy to update and remove in case anything happens. Backing up is quite easy. We have security features for the backup.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I’m the only user in my organization.

How are customer service and support?

The product provides good documentation online.

How was the initial setup?

It is easy to deploy the product. I deployed it on my own. The deployment took an hour. We deploy the product using Kamal. It uses Docker. The tool is deployed on the cloud. To deploy the solution, we just have to enter the password in the server and deploy it. It wasn't much of a hassle.

What was our ROI?

The tool is easy to manage and saves us time. It has much less complications.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

We're using the community version. The tool is open source.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I also use PostgreSQL.

What other advice do I have?

The tool helps us get the job done. It is not very complex. Overall, I rate the product a nine out of ten.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free MySQL Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: August 2025
Buyer's Guide
Download our free MySQL Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.