HPE SimpliVity Room for Improvement
There is a file size limitation when you want to do an individual file restore, but they might have resolved this in newer versions. As I'm taking backups at the VM server level, I can restore a file from any one of those without standing up the VM, and I can restore it to any mounted VM that I want. The problem is that there is a file size limitation. It becomes problematic when I'm trying to restore. When I want to restore a backup of a SQL database, my backups are considerably larger than 10 gigs. So, the only way to restore that backup file is to mount the entire VM somewhere and then copy it, which doesn't take long at all.
Every now and then, we would have an instance where the replication of a backup wouldn't complete in a timely manner, and that would get it all wigged out in terms of how it maintained the files in the background, the way it knows whether a file has changed or not, and whether it is backed up and replicated. We would basically just suspend that backup for a little bit, do a manual backup of that server, and completely replicate it to other sites. We would then turn the regular backup routine back on, and then it would be fine. So, that's all dependent on the bandwidth.View full review »
Senior Solutions Architect at a manufacturing company with 51-200 employees
They have made several technology changes. Compared to the previous version, SimpliVity was acquired by HPE and now the product has totally changed.
Initially, the response was great with SimpliVity. After the technology changed the feedback from customers was not good. As a result, we no longer focus on Simplivity.
Our focus is more on Nutanix Hyperconverged.
SimpliVity has very limited options for the virtualization layer. They may have to with VMware or something similar.
The flexibility should be present. It should be the customer's choice of what virtualization layer they will choose, and not mandated from the solution that you have to use VMware. VMware is not cheap. It comes with its own cost.
If the customer has the option to go with the Microsoft Hyper-V then customers should get the flexibility to have Hyper-V in place of the hypervisor.
Ultimately, the hypervisor functionality by default when you go for the data center becomes more cost-effective.
It should have the intelligence, to alert you that a failure of the cache is about to happen. It should be able to give you the predictive alarm and it should create its own backup.
It should have some provision where the cache is being copied to another location. So when one copy has been deleted or a copy has been corrupted, we should be able to recover it from the other site to ensure the office data is secure.
It should have some provision wherein the cache is being copied to some other location so that even if one copy has been deleted or one copy has been corrupted, we are able to recover it from the other location which will keep the office data secure.
From a product perspective, it should be more flexible.
It should allow users to have more data control in areas such as the cache. It should allow the user to have more data reduction flexibility.
Data reduction is something that is completely missing in the current solution, once SimpliVity was bought by HPE. It was the primary reason customers were interested in it.
SimpliVity handles the data. HCI is about how RAID is maintained over the network, and how many duplicate copies have been stored, or whether you are going for RF2 or RF3. Those things have to be taken into consideration.
With VMware,vSAN, and SimpliVity they are more dependent on the cache. If the cache fails then I have to recover the data. It's complete downtown for me. Anytime the data is not recovered, it's business downtime.
Senior Datacenter Consultant at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees
I would like more extensive deployment orchestration where the vCenter is deployed initially without being a separate thing. I feel that the deployment process of the vCenter should be included in the initial deployment to make it easier. Also, there are some issues when it comes to VMware's attaching and upgrades because HPE doesn't support all versions of VMware, and it can take some time before they have tested the latest versions.
So the lifecycle management can be improved, and also the initial deployment to include vCenter.View full review »
Although HPE has made significant improvements, the upgrade procedure is still overly complex. It's gotten much easier but it's still far from double clicking on a link and a self-upgrade scenario. Therefore, installing SimpliVity upgrades is an area that HPE could improve upon further.
Performing file-level restores, which is the most common backup recovery operation that we do, also seems more complex than it needs to be. The recovered files/folders are restored to an ISO file, mounted as a DVD, and then they need to be copied from that. Afterwards, the ISO needs to be removed from the VM and then deleted from the SimpliVity storage. It gets the job done but it's kind of clunky.
I think our LAN and branches started to use the VDI. We are hitting the point of a bottleneck with the end users and are complaining to support about this. Now, after using the SimpliVity with these nodes, we solve all the problems to cut the support cases for the end users. Also, the applications that they are running over the SimpliVity and HCI solutions are running better than the normal traditional solution. Bottleneck is the main issue.View full review »
Senior Solutions Architect at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
When we failed it, there was a hardware accelerator card, however, now HP is saying the hardware is no longer available, and it will be the end of life. Now, we have only the software. That is a shock for us. When someone is using a hardware accelerator, then he needs some upgrades. Now, we have to say there is no hardware card. Now you have to use the software. There will be a mismatch.
The Omni Card consumes a lot of memory and CPU. On the HP selling site, it says Omni Card can offload your CPU and memory, however, in reality, it consumes more memory and CPU.
Chief System & Security Officer at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees
The product is expensive. We are in Turkey and the Turkish Lira currency is higher than in other countries. $1 is about 9 Turkish Lira now. If you buy something in US dollars, and if you calculate it in our currency, that means we need to multiply the total by nine. It's costly.
The initial configuration is complicated. HPE had to help us.
HPE is complex.
HPE SimpliVity uses some additional memory inside in order to do site infrastructure work. However, you need to calculate this. You need to make sure you have enough memory and CPU for your purposes now and in the future. However, they don't explain that you might lose, for example, 10% of memory during configuration. Knowing that might affect what you actually need in the long run. They really have to lay out for their customers at the outset what is used and how much space is taken up, et cetera. That way, you can calculate that into your capacity.
The price is one of the biggest problems our customers have. The solution is great, but at the end of the day, it's expensive. Compared to other solutions on the market, like Nutanix or vSAN, you are paying for something else. In this case, I have to explain the big differences within HPE SimpliVity. Overall, the biggest issue I have is regarding the price.
The problem is not necessarily with the HPE SimpliVity console itself because it's very easy to integrate with. Sometimes, our customers just want to have the opportunity to have the freedom to choose between Hyper-V and VMware. We love that kind of possibility.
It's not so frequently that we have a request about Hyper-V, but our customers do ask about the differences regarding licensing prices because at the end of the day, with Microsoft, the hypervisor is included with the operating system — that saves money.
The feature that I would like to see improved in the next release is migrations. There needs to be a simple process for migrating one SimpliVity cluster to a new SimpliVity cluster.View full review »
Senior Product Manager at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees
It is not so cheap, and this is the most common complaint that my customers have. It is a very good product, but the price is an issue in Latin America.
VMware is a de facto tool. It would be useful for customers if HP can also use Red Hat or any other open-source virtualization product. Currently, you can only use VMware to manage the machines inside SimpliVity.View full review »
To install or to update it is more complicated than other solutions.
They can automate a lot of things. We do a lot of things manually and this is somewhat unnecessary. For example, the installation of a plug-in, or VMware, and so on. If you can automate all these things, like Nutanix, you get a better result. It's very simple to install Nutanix. You click and wait. The whole implementation is pretty automatic. SimpliVity will be very, very good if it can automate many aspects of the deployment.
It would be ideal if they could include OpenView managers in one place with all the equipment.View full review »
Administrador TIC at a construction company with 1,001-5,000 employees
We haven't had any issues. Recently, we purchased new SimpliVity nodes. We are pretty confident with the platform. We are using it more than in the beginning.
The installation was a bit complicated.
There may be issues around scaling.
Technical support could be better.
SimpliVity has to evolve into a solution that is more integrated with the public cloud. At the moment, this is not the case. It's not our case, however, if we wanted to make some kind of hybrid integration between private cloud and public cloud, SimpliVity is not well prepared for this.View full review »
FD at Alpha 55
One area of the service that could use improvement is that it is an aging solution. The market activity shelf life is over as people are moving toward a more savvy cloud box.
One con to the solution is the expense. A second thing is it has to be tailor-made properly. The presales part has to be done properly. Otherwise, you can misguide the customer.
Another issue is that it's not growing. I don't know what they want to do and apply for that particular solution or if they are looking for something else. I haven't seen many improvements in the last couple of years.
Also, nowadays everything is a very lean architecture, but SimpliVity is not a lean architecture in terms of anything. SimpliVity should be very lean in terms of the solution.
Assistant Manager - IT & IS at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
There's nothing overly special or unique about the solution.
Overall, SimpliVity has a lot of features, however, those features need to be more precise. It's like a jack of all trades and master of none. It needs to hone in on a few features and really make them shine.
SimpliVity claims to have what you call a compression and dedup ratio, however, in practice, it doesn't really work.
They need to give more controls and more features as far as the backup is concerned.
The initial setup is not that easy.
The licensing could be more clear.
The technical support isn't ideal right now.View full review »
General Manager / CTO with 201-500 employees
When it comes to upgrading and additional features, it would be nice if the solution had the ability to fully archive data in an external storage solution other than HPE Simplivity.
I wish to see an improved compute node selection, to allow us to select something other than merely the two socket system. It can go through four sockets, such as the DL580.
I would like to see the ability to do the integration between HCI and dHCI. I understand that there is a roadmap for these, but I have yet to see the release. Hopefully, this will occur soon.
Other than this, so far so good.View full review »
We had some hardware compatibility issues with the earlier versions of HPE SimpliVity. We upgraded to the latest version a few months ago, and since then, there is no hardware failure, and it is better.
They don't provide a portal to create a ticket directly for the HPE SimpliVity. We have a web portal to create a ticket when we have an issue, but for HPE SimpliVity, we need to call the local vendor for support. If they are not able to resolve the issue, they contact the global support, which takes more time.
Technology is moving very fast, and everybody nowadays is focusing on the cloud base. In the future, they should integrate it with the cloud base for the backup.View full review »
In my experience, the only improvement that can be made is the price. It is much more costly than other solutions such as VxRail.
We would like to provide our customers with a virtual demo and have not been able to find this available. We don't have access to show the demo virtually to our customers or partners. This is lacking in this sector. We are not able to provide hands-on experience.
The centric management could be simplified or more user-friendly. Customers require an easier way to handle any product.View full review »
It could integrate better with other platforms. It's a proprietary solution of HPE, so you are stuck. Before I was running SimpliVity as an independent solution. it wasn't a card and software, so you could put in whatever server, IBM, Dell, etc. Now it's a proprietary solution for HPE, but it's difficult for them to improve because they have both solutions. But it's the same with Nutanix, I will say.
DATABASE APPLICATION ENGINEER with 1-10 employees
The fact that it is tied to a certain hardware platform would probably be the bigger negative versus just being able to buy something off the shelf.
Solutions Coordinator at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
They can bring more awareness about this product. In this part of the world or this region, people normally don't know about SimpliVity and its capabilities. The company we have it sold to hasn't been able to fully utilize all the features or understand the features. So, product awareness should be improved.
Its scalability should be improved. We should be able to add drives without disrupting the services.View full review »
Prior to the latest release, it was a real pain to upgrade SimpliVity. First, the host server had to be upgraded with the latest drivers, followed by an upgrade of the OmniStack controller software, and lastly, an upgrade of the VMware ESXi software. Each of the three steps were done independently and the process took 2 to 3 hours per node. Starting with the 4.0 Release, an Upgrade Manager orchestrates the whole process and greatly simplifies it. It still takes 2+ hours per node, however.
The price can be dropped a little bit. The product should be competitive with other brands.
The technical support around the world can be a lot more open as you cannot search all the KBs or the community for support. Most of the time, you need to call HPE directly. The solution really just lacks documentation.
Head of ICT Infrastructure at a construction company with 1,001-5,000 employees
HPE SimpliVity could be more flexible and scalable. I don't feel SimpliVity is flexible or easily scalable because I still need to buy another server to add to my clusters. I can't just run or harvest and add to my solution. I need to buy another server.
There are a lot of components that are not giving a lot of value to me right now. I also had a few problems with the built-in hard disk drives. I've had many issues with the harvest stripes that the servers use. Maybe it's a coincidence, but it's unusual to have a physical failure on the HPE platform. I don't see any value at the software level, especially in the software that manages that solution.
I was waiting for something, especially in the application layer that I would use, but that is all over VMware, and it doesn't have an integrated module that I can use to manage the server and all the instances.View full review »
Senior IT Specialist at Servicios de Consultorias de IT
In terms of what should be improved, I think that the local support in Argentina is not good. This is a new technology and HPE doesn't have a lot of technology specialists here in Argentina. It's very hard to find the specialist here.
Additionally, the price must be better. Here in Argentina, Dell is very competitive. If the client doesn't understand the functionality that SimpliVity has, he will chose by price, and Dell is very, very competitive here in Argentina.
Lastly, Stretched Cluster is a new functionality and is something that the client needs.View full review »
The solution needs to improve the high data availability.
The backup and recovery process needs to be faster. Right now, it's a bit slow.
There needs to be more customization capabilities available for customers. That's lacking and clients would really like it if they could better customize the product to better fit their needs.View full review »
Its price can be improved. Customers always look for better prices. It is more expensive as compared to other products available in the market.
Presales and Consulting at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
The solution has a complex configuration. So I think they should simplify the con. They should go back to having special hardware for the compression with T2, so you don't need to have a big processor if you use just one processor.
Its scalability can be improved. When we put a lot of nodes, sometimes, its performance decreases. Its price can also be improved.
I would like some reporting about backup and replication.View full review »
Professional ICT at a non-tech company with 11-50 employees
In the next release of the solution, they should make updating the solution easier. Currently, we have HPE doing it for us but I would like to be able to do it.View full review »
Once I am into the SimpliVity environment, I always have to go with HP because I am somewhat blocked, like Apple. Secondly, if I want to increase only storage, I need to buy an entire computing node for that, an entire HCI node. However, there are certain other providers, like Hitachi and AirDeck, that provide solutions. You can go with any of the hardware infrastructure, and they can provide you with their solutions for HCI itself. HCI is a simple software layer, a hypervisor layer for them.
So, they can add computing, storage, and networking to it that is vendor agnostic. In HP, Dell, VxRail, or Cisco, there is a drawback. I have to go with that brand again, and I have to add a simple load of HCI in place if I want to increase computing, networking, or storage.
SimpliVity is also compatible with all HP appliances, though it is not compatible with other brands or vendors. It could be more compatible and more secure.View full review »
Group IT Manager at a hospitality company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The interface is good but takes some time to get used to.View full review »
It would be good to have more compatibility with other solutions as an improvement in the future. As a suggestion, in order to have compatibility with other solutions, there could be a license fee for this, and if you don't need to them then you do not need to pay.View full review »
Junior Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
There are some problems with the product's stability, specifically with backup, that could be improved. The integration and automation could also be improved. In addition, when updates appear, they are often delayed and don't provide new features. In the next release, I would like to see integrations with multiple OEM vendors and better compatibility with other OEMs.View full review »
There is room for improvement in the operations area because the support for that server space is minimal. I want to sell a solution, but not bigger than the one I have. Maybe they can offer more features for more customers and optimize it, but with the same protections that I already have right now.
I want to replicate my business offering in the United States. I want to pay for HPE SimpliVity in Mexico, but they told me that it's not possible. They told me that I need to look for a representative in the United States and make all the payments over there.View full review »
Senior System Administrator with 11-50 employees
The solution could improve by adding better support of the VMware add-ons and a more intuitive user interface for administrators.
In a future release, all the management features should be able to access from one location. For example, management of networking and system resources on the server should be in one place to view and manage.View full review »
VP Comercial at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
I'm not a technical guy, and I am pretty much okay with the way it is, but it would help if it was closest to Nutanix in Gartner's Magic Quadrants. Nutanix very often beats us. Nutanix provides Acropolis for free. It probably would be great if we have a virtualization layer. It is something that might be lacking in our solution. We depend on VMware, and it is very expensive. It is lacking the software that allows us to install it with HPE and not depend on a third party.
Process Control Senior Supervisor at a mining and metals company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The initial configuration could be improved.
The way that it handles the memory could be better.
The initial setup can be quite difficult.
Technical support needs to be more responsive.View full review »
Co-Founder at BIGBOOM ASIA CO.,LTD.
We haven't really explored all areas of this solution we are still in the POC phase.
Pricing and monitoring could be improved.
I think that they should have their own hyper-converged system.View full review »
Consultant at a security firm with 1-10 employees
The greatest disadvantage is the update process. Every patch or release update must be checked and deployed with the HPE solution, which sometimes is a little bit difficult. It is not difficult in terms of installation, but it is difficult to get the patches in time.
Its scalability can also be improved.View full review »
I don't have any criticisms of SimpliVity at the moment, but I would like to see how it stacks up to vSAN and Data Core. It's essential for the client to have the comparison and be secure that they made a good choice.View full review »
Senior Project Manager at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
I would like to see support for having different clustered environments for production and testing.
When it comes to performing backups, the dashboard is not intuitive and not user-friendly. This is something that should be improved. It should be easier to perform backups.View full review »
IT Manager at Triara
It's not exactly straightforward to use. We need to train our people as some features that are there we are not used to or maybe we don't know how to use. Therefore, we need to train our people.
Maybe the price could be a bit better.
The compatibility with other products needs an improvement.
There's a controller or something that is used. Instead of using vSAN, they use another technology, NFS. I don't like it. That said, it works.View full review »
I think the licensing cost could be lower.View full review »
Line Technical Agent at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees
They should optimize the administration stack because it is consuming too much memory. It ends up consuming 20% of memory. They have another product for this feature, but I would like to have this feature within HPE SimpliVity.View full review »
Co-Founder/CTO at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
There are a lot of different components to choose from in the chassis. This could be easier by providing a standard or a base model to create and configure from.
Support analyst with 5,001-10,000 employees
There are some small changes that can be made to the interface to improve it but it typically works well.View full review »
System Engineer (Storage/HCI) at a construction company with 201-500 employees
I'd like to see some improvements in terms of simplifying deployment and making it more user friendly. I think the technical support could be improved as well.
SimpliVity has no file server services. That's one of the solution's biggest shortcomings.View full review »
It would be better if it could integrate more easily with other vendors.View full review »
I have a free project with SimpliVity deployment in the next three months. What can be improved is that in one or two of these projects, I need a cloud backup for the infrastructure and data.
As for the infrastructure of the product as it relates to customer size, it is not very good at this moment in Peru.
I need a solution for the cloud. In Peru, it's a three or four solution provider for cloud services.View full review »
System Administrator at Full House
An area for improvement would be the flexibility of server configuration.View full review »
The solution could have an optimization site and provide assistance at that site. HPE SimpliVity would also benefit if it installed bigger products like having a Blade solution.View full review »
Head-IT/SAP at Barista Coffee Company Ltd.
Technologies are going ahead with new patches and updates, and HPE has to find out a solution to make it more reliable and secure.
Its deployment should be easier.View full review »
Systems Engineer-Consultant at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
The product's installation process could be made easier.View full review »
Jinoy P S
Solution Expert at Frontier Business systems
SimpliVity's data management could be better. Nutanix's interface is a bit more user-friendly.View full review »
We are in Turkey, because of the different currency they are not always compatible.View full review »
Senior Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Its performance can be faster.View full review »
Senior System Engineer at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
HPE SimpliVity should cost less.View full review »