Google Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy Reviews

We use the solution for data engineering, data preparation, and AI.

The tool is really good, especially for ease of implementation and having many options. We can build complex data pipelines and AI models, like web-based AI assistants or chatbots.

Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy should improve stability. 

I rate the tool's stability a nine out of ten. 

My company has 10-15 users. 

Support is good, and there is lots of material available online. We usually don't need to call someone, but if we do, it's okay.

straightforward to set up and easy to learn. There are lots of training materials and hands-on labs, making it easy to onboard new team members. Our engineers really like the platform.

There are different pricing plans depending on data volumes and services, but it's comparable to other providers. The value and benefits depend on what we're developing and the specific use case.

I rate Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy an eight out of ten. I'd recommend it. We use both Azure and GCP, and they're both really good. It depends on client preference.

I use Google Cloud IAP to secure my applications by verifying user identities.

I like Google Cloud IAP because it is easy to use and stable.

As an individual developer, I would like Google Cloud IAP to offer more flexibility, especially for smaller-scale usage.

I have been using  Google Cloud IAP for seven years.

I would rate the stability as a nine out of ten.

The support is very good.

I have previously used AWS, but Google is my preferred option.

I would recommend Google Cloud IAP for those starting, especially for individuals or smaller projects. While larger enterprises might lean towards AWS, I have found Google Cloud to be effective for my needs. Overall, I would rate Google Cloud IAP as a nine out of ten.

I use the solution for emails, reminders, and other personal work. I am a service engineer, and I use the solution alone.

I like that the solution has high availability and is stable and free. Likewise, the interface is quite good.

The local sales team contact is not easily available. If I want to contact a sales account manager at Google directly to buy something, I cannot approach them directly. I have to go through layers of vendors. Only then can I somehow approach.

I've used Google Cloud Platform for about five or six years now.

I rate the solution's stability a nine out of ten because there is scope for improvement.

The initial setup was easy and intuitive. It was an easy transition.

I rate Google Cloud Platform a nine out of ten. I recommend the solution to others, and my friends and family always use it.

The solution can be used for building the infrastructure on the cloud.

The solution's security should be improved.

I have been working with Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy for a few months.

The solution's stability seems good.

Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is a scalable solution.

Before Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity, I worked with AWS and Azure. I switched to Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity because of the client's needs.

Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is a cloud-based solution.

Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

We use the solution for continuous integration and deployment of applications on databases.

The solution's most valuable features are Google domains, UI setup, easy server access, and intuitive dashboards.

The solution's naming conventions feature needs improvement. We encounter issues while setting up emails as well. They should improve this particular area. Also, they should integrate the solution with more applications.

I have been using the solution for six months.

The solution's stability is good.

We have five solution users in our organization. It is expensive to scale up the solution.

The solution's initial setup was fine. However, it took a lot of work to name the features. The process involves setting up the server, connecting to the gateway, and setting up user access and security codes.

The implementation of the solution was done natively on the platform.

The solution generates a good return on investment.

We pay for the solution’s compute engine every month.

I rate the solution as an eight. I advise others to go through the documentation before deploying it. They can set up a small cluster to practice before implementing it.

The most valuable features of Google Cloud Platform are the Kubernetes engine, CI/CD, and BigQuery. 

Apigee is a good feature because we analyzed and changed the computer-associated AP to Apigee. We compared the features and created the clusters to change the solution to Apigee. It's a good option on the Google Cloud Platform. And I like BigQuery, which is a fantastic database on the SaaS model. The hard part is creating the pack because our applications are in Azure Data Proxy, Data Fabric, and Data Factory. Our team used these tools in Azure, but in the future, they will transition to GCP.

I've been using Google Cloud Platform for one year.

Google support is outstanding. It's effortless to contact Google engineers, who are all Brazilians. The work is well explained, and they participate in our technical meetings. 

I think the price of Google Cloud Platform is reasonable. However, Microsoft is the most cost-effective solution for us because of Azure's integration. And we already have licenses for Windows Server and the databases, so the price is attractive. And the price of AWS is higher, but we have only two big applications on the AWS. Still, I like Google so much, and my company thinks GCP is the best way to handle our workloads.

I rate Google Cloud Platform nine out of 10. I like the GCP so much because it's flexible. We have tools for similar tech drivers, and we can connect them in the other clouds, where I use the Anthos platform. I created an Anthos platform for similar tech drivers to administer all of the different cloud solutions on the same platform. So, for example, I can put the comments on Cloud Shell and create a resource in the other clouds.

Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy provides more control of our assets because normally when you're using Google Cloud, you have to use your Google email. IAP can control the assets that only come from the dedicated company or IP address.

It's a scalable solution that is easy to install as well.

The support can be more efficient. Google has different layers of support, like layer one, layer two, and layer three, but normally, the response from layer one is not very useful.

Google is not very capable when it comes to patching vulnerabilities. It would be nice if they could improve this security issue or CVE.

The stability needs to be improved for some services.

I've been using it for around five months because I just joined this company.

If you are talking about virtual machines, our customers would say that this solution is not so stable because sometimes Google Cloud has host errors. We haven't been able to get a good explanation from Google regarding this.

If you're using Kubernetes, it's quite stable, but if you are using VM, the system will typically reboot at least once every three months.

It's quite scalable.

If I ranked technical support from one to five, with five being the highest score, I would rank it at around three.

Technical support could be more efficient. Google has different layers of support, like layer one, layer two, and layer three, and the response from layer one is not very useful.

The installation should be easy.

I would recommend this product because with Google Cloud Platform, you can do a lot of applications that you cannot do with AWS. AWS is more useful for developers because it has moved from general usage.

I would rate Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy at six on a scale from one to ten because it still needs some improvements.

I've been using Google virtual machines, Google FUSE. It has many, many products across the entire cloud platform. GCP can be used for data storage and for virtual machine creation.

It has some stack of products in it that I have found quite useful.

The solution is very easy to use. It's easy to navigate and to work with.

It's quite a flexible product.

We've found the solution to be scalable. 

The product is great. I can't think of a way it can be improved. There aren't any missing features. It's quite complete.

The solution could be more reasonably priced. We find it to be a bit expensive right now.

I've been using the solution for about a year or so. It hasn't been very long just yet.

The scalability of the solution is very good. If a company needs to expand it, it can do so with relative ease. It's not hard at all.

I'm not sure how many users in total are on it in our organization. It might be between ten to 20 people or so. There aren't too many people on it currently.

I plan to continue to use it going forward. I can't speak to the company's plans for if it, and that includes increasing usage or not.

I've never had the chance to reach out to technical support, and therefore can't speak to how helpful or responsive they are. I cannot evaluate them having had no direct interactions with them.

There isn't really an installation process for this solution. It's on the cloud. You don't need to implement anything. It's all just ready to go.

The solution could be cheaper. Right now, it's a bit expensive.

We've looked at the Oracle Cloud Platform and Amazon AWS and both services are good.

We're always using the latest version of the solution. It's always the latest as we are on the cloud deployment model and it auto-updates.

I'd rate the solution at a nine out of ten. Its capabilities have been very good overall and we've been very happy with it.

I'd recommend the solution to other users and organizations. It's worked well for us.