Cribl Reviews

I use Cribl to move data and help with moving data, connecting different data sources to different destinations, which is what I mainly use it for.

I also use it to help parse the data as well.

Something that I really appreciate about Cribl is the preview feature. Whether it would be on the JavaScript I'm working on, it shows me the output in real time, which really helps with development.

I also appreciate the preview feature when it comes to data pipelines, as it shows me in real time how my pipeline would be working with the data. Additionally, I really appreciate the live capture feature as well to get an idea of how the data looks at different stages in Cribl environment.

I think Cribl is an excellent tool for helping to manage data cost and keep it down as well as manage complexity.

Cribl has come a long way. I've been using it for three years, but there are still a lot of other features that I would appreciate regarding new data sources. One example would be open WebSockets.

There's currently not a native feature for that, so that requires a lot of time in development. I would also appreciate better support for JWT tokens for a REST API collection. While sometimes it does work, it seems very janky and seems like a stitched-together solution. It would be nice if there was a more supported version to help with JWT.

I've been working with Cribl for a long time, at least three years, maybe more.

Cribl is very robust. It's not perfect, but very good stability.

Cribl is very scalable. The product itself lends itself well to being scaled. Any issues I've had with scaling have mainly just been human issues of people not wanting to scale, but the product itself is very capable of scaling.

The speed was fast. The quality, however, there wasn't a solution just because I think it was a bug and it was never fixed as far as I know. The speed was nice, but there was never a solution provided.

I use Splunk.

From what I understand, I'm mainly on the engineering side, not the sales side, but the pricing is very competitive. Although the pricing can be a little bit high, I know that Cribl as a product helps save a lot of money by reducing data storage. The pricing is offset by the money I save by using Cribl.

Cribl does require maintenance, especially if I'm deploying it on-premises. If I'm deploying on-premises on my machines, I've just got to make sure that they're being provisioned well, that they're being updated successfully, and that they're constantly balancing the worker processing across them.

I definitely prefer Cribl more, mainly for the UI and the preview feature that I mentioned about being able to see in real time my in and out for development. I think that speeds things up a lot.

However, I do like Splunk a lot too.

I think Splunk is better tailored for visualizations and presenting to clients, especially around metrics. I think I can do some visualizations and presentations of metrics in Cribl, but it's not as robust as Splunk.

Definitely for large corporations, they would see the most benefit, but I think small and medium businesses could also benefit as well.

I use Cribl for data integration, pipelining, data monitoring, scalability, and to check how my monitor is working. The main product we use is Cribl Stream, which we use for log routing, filtering, and transforming data before sending it to our SIEM platform. This is the core part of our log management pipeline. Through Cribl Stream, we mainly work with features such as data pipelining, routing rules, and data transformation functions to control how logs move between different systems. My hands-on experience is primarily with Stream, since that is the component we rely on most for processing and optimizing log data in our environment.

The main product we use is Cribl Stream, which we use for log routing, filtering, and transforming data before sending it to our SIEM platform. Through Cribl Stream, we mainly work with features such as data pipelining, routing rules, and data transformation functions to control how logs move between different systems. My hands-on experience is primarily with Stream, since that is the component we rely on most for processing and optimizing log data in our environment.

One of the biggest advantages for my organization is better control over log data. We can filter, transform, and route logs before they reach downstream systems such as the SIEM platform, which helps reduce noise and focus only on relevant data. Another key benefit is cost optimization. By dropping unnecessary logs and sending only important data, we significantly reduce ingestion and storage costs in tools such as Splunk. It also improves operational efficiency.

One key area is simplifying the user experience, especially for new users. Since it has multiple components such as metrics, traces, and detectors, making onboarding and navigation more intuitive would be beneficial. One area of improvement could be reducing the learning curve. Since it is a very flexible tool with powerful pipeline configuration, new users may take some time to fully understand how to design and optimize pipelines efficiently. Another improvement could be more pre-built templates or out-of-the-box integration of common data sources, which would help teams get started faster without building from scratch. I also think enhanced monitoring and troubleshooting visibility for pipelines would be helpful, especially in large environments where multiple data flows are being processed.

The main strength is its flexibility, scalability, and cost optimization benefits. It gives strong control over what data is processed and sent to downstream systems. The reason I would not give it a ten is mainly due to the learning curve and initial complexity, especially for new users. Some areas such as documentation or advanced troubleshooting could be improved.

I have been working in the cybersecurity and security operations space for around one year.

Cribl is stable and reliable. I would rate stability and reliability at eight out of ten. In my experience, it is generally performing well.

I would rate the scalability of Cribl at eight or nine out of ten. Its ability to handle a high volume of different data types would get a rating of eight or nine out of ten. It is designed to process large-scale telemetry data from multiple sources such as firewalls, cloud services, applications, and infrastructure. It can handle different formats such as JSON, syslog, and custom logs, and transform them within the pipeline with its distributed architecture. We can scale horizontally by adding worker nodes, which allows it to handle increased data volumes without major performance issues.

We faced an issue with a pipeline dropping certain log events unexpectedly. We reached out to support, and they helped us analyze the pipeline configuration and logs. Initially, the response was general, but after sharing more details such as sample logs and pipeline rules, they were able to identify that the filter condition was incorrectly configured, which was causing the data to be dropped. They guided us on how to modify the rule and validate the data flow using a live preview, and we were able to resolve the issue very quickly. Overall, the support team was very helpful and knowledgeable, especially once the issue was clearly explained, and it helped us solve the problem without major downtime.

Before Cribl, most log processing was handled directly within the SIEM platforms, mainly using tools such as Splunk native and sometimes Logstash for data processing. The limitation with that approach was that all the raw log data was first ingested into the SIEM, and then filtering or transformation were applied afterwards. This increased the data volume and cost complexity. We moved to Cribl to introduce a dedicated data pipeline layer before the SIEM, which allows us to filter, transform, and route data more efficiently before ingestion.

As I am on the technical side, I was involved in the initial setup of Cribl. My role included configuring data sources, setting up pipelines, and defining routing and filtering rules based on our different requirements. I also worked on integrating Cribl with our SIEM platform, ensuring that only relevant and optimized data is forwarded. During the setup, we focused on designing efficient pipelines, testing data flow, and validating transformations to make sure everything was working correctly. Overall, the initial setup was not very complex, but it required proper planning to design the pipelines.

Other than this platform, it is more valuable. Before adopting Cribl, we did look at a few other approaches. Some of the evaluations were around using native capabilities within SIEM platforms such as Splunk, as well as open-source log processing tools such as Logstash for handling data pipelines. Those options can work for log collection and processing, but Cribl stood out because it provides a dedicated platform specifically designed for observability and security data pipelines. It offers more flexibility in routing, filtering, and transforming logs without heavily relying on the SIEM itself. The visual pipeline management and real-time visibility into data flow were also important factors that made Cribl a better fit for managing large volumes of log data across multiple systems. We saw other options, but by way of references, we determined that Cribl is more relevant for our work. So we chose Cribl.

I would recommend starting with a few simple pipelines, then gradually expanding as you become more comfortable with the platform. I would rate Cribl eight out of ten. A few improvements in Splunk Observability Cloud could make it even better. Overall, I would give Cribl a rating of 8.5 out of ten.

Our main use case for Cribl was primarily data reduction, as we were spending a lot of money on data ingest, and we brought Cribl on board to reduce the amount of money we were spending on that ingest. 

Reduction in firewall logs was our primary use case for Cribl, as 80% of our data is Palo Alto firewall logs, and a lot of it we don't necessarily need in the SIEM tool, so we use Cribl to reduce that, keep only the stuff we want, drop the rest, and keep it out of the SIEM tool. The reduction in firewall logs keeps the unwanted data out so that when the security engineers are inside the SIEM tool, they only see the stuff they need to see.

The features of Cribl that I appreciate the most are the vendor agnosticism and the ability to send data almost anywhere you want, regardless of the data type, the format, or the destination; it's very flexible, and we've been able to integrate it with the tools that we have used in the past and are planning to use in the future.

The UI is very clean and super intuitive, making it very easy to bring data on via the sources, route the data to any number of destinations that you want, and create pipelines to transform and morph that data however you want. 

Cribl is great in the sense that it can handle a large amount of volume and scales with the amount of data that you want to bring on board; if you need to bring on board more data, you just increase the amount of workers that you have.

We use Cribl to reduce data cost and complexity by both dropping fields that we don't want or parts of events that we don't want while keeping the things we do want, while also keeping all of the data, the event in its full form. We're a government agency, so we ned to keep everything. With Cribl, we can have our cake and eat it too, in a sense.

I'm an engineer, so I think about logging. Improvement could be made in the logging area, as sometimes we encounter issues in a pipeline or something, and it's not immediately obvious when you look at the logs that the pipeline is failing.

I've been using Cribl for around four years.

I would give Cribl a great rating on stability and reliability, especially if you use the built-in alerting engine that they have, as you can get alerts directly if there are any problems with the worker itself or worker processes, and the built-in monitoring page makes it super easy to monitor the health of all your worker processes.

Cribl scales great with our company as we're actually bringing on a lot more data with all the AI tools rolling out, which generate a lot of logs, and Cribl scales horizontally by just adding more workers and worker processes, allowing us to tackle that data smoothly, quickly, and efficiently.

We've had a great experience with Cribl customer service, as we have dedicated PS resources that have been super helpful when we were rolling out Cribl initially, migrating sources of data from syslog over to Cribl, routing, and parsing, with the support being A+ on both the PS side and the technical support side.

Positive

Cribl is really the only tool out there that does what it does, especially when looking at Splunk, as when Cribl first came out, Splunk wasn't able to intuitively do a lot of the things that Cribl did just out of the box with a GUI, making it super easy. 

We were dabbling in data reduction, transformation using Splunk's Universal Forwarder and even the Heavy Forwarder in some instances, but it was just not as intuitive, with a lot of command line interaction and no GUI on the front end, making it harder to do, while Cribl makes it super easy.

When we deployed Cribl, we were on-prem. All of our workers are on-prem. Our leaders are on-prem. Nothing's in the cloud. The major challenges that we faced really were related to the load balancer that needs to sit in front of the workers. I would like to maybe see that rolled up into Cribl in the future. That posed a lot of challenges for us just coordinating with our infrastructure team, getting the F5 engineers involved, using F5 load balancer. That was a challenge for us. We ultimately tackled it, however.

From my point of view, the biggest return on investment is just the downstream licensing costs we save on the SIEM side; we've reduced our data by a certain amount, and it has almost paid for Cribl itself and also allowed us to chop some licensing off of the SIEM side. We've reduced our amount of ingest by about 40% overall.

I'm not really involved in the pricing and payment aspect of Cribl. I'm just the guy who implements it all once it's bought and paid for.

We're not using Cribl Search at the moment; we're only using Stream and Edge.

If you're a company out there considering Cribl, I would highly recommend at least giving it due diligence; get linked up with the sales rep, as they're going to explain everything to you, and the sales engineers are great and very knowledgeable, making it worth your time and money, so you're going to be glad you did. 

I rate Cribl nine out of ten.

Cribl is used to manage routing of different log systems and vulnerability type log scanning and retention, which is then re-routed to log retention servers. Firewall logs are sent directly from firewalls into Splunk, which is where Cribl also sends data, so Cribl is bypassed for firewalls. Cribl is primarily utilized for internal servers, systems, and endpoints.

The ability to make different variations and adjustments within Cribl to scan for specific items or to get an overall scan is valuable. Cribl's ability to contain data cost and complexity makes the system much easier to use. The cost is higher than preferred, but it is considered the cost of doing business. Data ingestion costs increase with higher ingestion levels, but by maintaining similar or lower levels and refining tuning and ingestion as it comes, costs have been maintained and remain within expectations.

Cribl's interface is user-friendly and easy to learn, making it simple to teach new users how to use it.

Cribl handles a high volume of diverse data types very well, such as logs and metrics. However, the endpoint plug-in tool can use some refinement, as it tends to hit system resources and can sometimes be detrimental to systems to the point where it must be turned off and a scan restarted when a user is offline.

Outside of the endpoint issue, there may not be much that Cribl can do better in the program itself. It becomes tedious when one-off fixes are needed because a user submits a ticket complaining that their system is unusable due to Cribl performing a scan.

Cribl has been used for approximately six years in a career, not necessarily on this job only.

No lagging, crashing, downtime, or instability has been observed in Cribl itself, only in the endpoint scanner. The system itself has been very solid.

Cribl is fairly easy to scale. If ingestion levels need to increase or decrease, adding new nodes is not an issue. Adding the endpoint scanner is not difficult and is fairly easy to use and upscale as needed.

Customer support or technical support through a ticket or email has not been contacted personally. The DevOps team, which handles maintenance updates, has contacted support when running into an issue, which may occur once a year if that, so nothing major has been cause for concern.

The initial deployment of Cribl was somewhat tedious due to the environment being specialized and restricted in an air-gapped setup, so everything had to be built on-premise. This made deployment more difficult when unable to reach the internet to get updates. It took some time, but this was strictly due to the restricted environment, as everything had to be placed on a hard drive, brought across, updated, and then troubleshot through that effort.

No alternatives to Cribl have been tried because there has been no need to.

Cribl requires routine updates, with no other real maintenance required. This review is rated an eight out of ten.

We work on Splunk, so we use Cribl. Our company works with a system where approximately 12 to 15 TB of data comes daily in Splunk. We don't store the data directly into Splunk; instead, we use Cribl first. By using Cribl, it removes unnecessary data and keeps the important data, which can reduce the size.

My favorite feature is that Cribl is connected with Splunk very easily and it routes the data. The filtering is the most important feature because it removes unwanted logs, and the central control manages everything from one place. Cribl provides pipelines, which process the data step-by-step, so all the features are very useful.

It is very difficult to learn as a beginner.

I sometimes experience downtime, and by that, we sometimes miss logs, which creates a problem, but not for a long time. Sometimes we face these issues.

I have been using Cribl for four months.

I sometimes experience downtime, and by that, we sometimes miss logs, which creates a problem, but not for a long time. Sometimes we face these issues.

I have a very good experience with customer support. When we are in trouble, they give us fast responses and good responses, which is very useful for us.

The initial deployment when I first started using Cribl was not that difficult. As a beginner, I think it is a little difficult, not that much easy. However, once you start learning and become an experienced user, it is very easy. One person can handle the whole setup without needing a large team.

Cribl's interface is very good, and it is easy to understand how to use Cribl. When I started to use Cribl, it wasn't that difficult to learn. I learned how to pass the data into Cribl, so it is easy. Cribl has a good user interface, which makes work easier for me. I would rate this product a 9 out of 10.

My current use cases involve using it as a pipeline to process data, to route data from cloud logs to different repositories. Some data goes to Splunk and others go to different data lakes. I didn't work with the firewall logs directly. We use Cribl to process web activity and route data that we wanted to into Splunk ES to create detections.

What I appreciate the most about Cribl is the free training, the free access to all the training, and how easy it is to learn it. Cribl is great in handling high volumes of diverse data types, such as logs and metrics. It does the job.

The product is very good. They could add more AI-assisted pipeline development in the future release.

I have been using Cribl for six months.

I haven't seen any lagging or crashing with Cribl.

Cribl's scalability is very good.

I have never contacted the technical support or customer support of Cribl.

Positive

The initial deployment when I first started with Cribl was fairly easy, very easy.

We were a team for this job.

I have used alternatives to Cribl. I forgot the name, but it's a CrowdStrike product they just acquired that is the closest one I've used to Cribl in terms of the quality and the features. Currently, I prefer Cribl more than CrowdStrike. I still haven't played much with the other one, but I didn't find any issues with Cribl.

Regarding Cribl's ability to contain data cost and complexity, if they can reduce their cost, that will make them more competitive. However, I don't know what else they can do in regards to how the application works. It's very good.

For the project that I was involved in, it took me probably three weeks to set it up. We had to maintain our pipelines, not because of anything related to Cribl itself, but because the data source changed, so we had to adjust our pipelines. That was the kind of maintenance that we did.

I would rate Cribl a nine out of ten.

I use Cribl with all of my customers that I manage services for. It's how I get their third-party log sources into Microsoft Sentinel.

We save about 75% percent of our costs by processing network and firewall logs through Cribl. This is largely due to the compression and duplication that exists within those logs. They tend to be very noisy, and most of the information isn’t useful from a security standpoint. While some of the data might be valuable to other departments, we don’t need to store all that extra information. By removing these unnecessary details, we quickly reduce our data retention costs by 75%.

Cribl makes it very easy to contain data cost and complexity. As far as complexity is concerned, there might be manual ways to do it in other products, but not with the ease and durability. It remains the same, whereas you might try to put a patchwork of other things together to get the same result. In terms of controlling costs, we achieve about 75% savings on data storage, which is fantastic. However, it’s worth noting that Cribl is not free, so we do pay for it to realize these savings. As long as Cribl doesn’t increase their prices too steeply or too quickly, we should be fine in terms of managing our costs.

Cribl definitely handles high volumes of diverse data types. Anything from firewall logs, endpoint security logs, to Windows event logs can become very noisy, especially in large environments. I've not had an issue with Cribl dropping logs. Occasionally there could be a short-term outage, but that's definitely very rare.

My favorite feature is Cribl Stream. That's probably the only Cribl product I have a lot of experience with, and Cribl Stream makes it very easy to identify where all the customer's log sources are and to quickly connect them to a destination source such as Microsoft Sentinel and Microsoft Azure Data Storage.

Cribl Stream does two things: not only does it make it easy to connect one log source or one dataset to multiple storage locations, but it also has compression features, which greatly reduce the storage cost for that data. It strips out and compresses data so that only the absolute information remains and not any duplicates. Dual destination and compression are the two top features.

I would Cribl to become more Microsoft-focused. A lot of my work is in the Microsoft environment. Cribl supports all of these other platforms out there, and they seem to be developing a lot for CrowdStrike. I'd prefer to see some Microsoft-specific connectors built inside of Cribl.

I have been using Cribl for about two years now. They've only been around for about four years, so I've been using them for half of their existence.

The performance and stability of Cribl are fantastic. The uptime is 99.9%. We are realizing all of the cost savings promised, and there are no failures.

Scalability is easy because we can just go into the portal and add a new log source. If we onboard a new firewall or something we want to collect logs on, we can quickly implement that. I don't need to talk to a Cribl engineer to connect a new log source. The only requirement might be purchasing more Cribl credits if I'm running low because I'm asking it to do more than originally specified.

We've engaged their customer service and support, and anytime there's an outage, they've been very receptive. They've quickly escalated our tickets and helped us get resolution. We've never felt we were waiting for a response or that they didn't know what was going on. I think it's maybe because we were an early customer. I would assume it's the same for all customers, but we've gotten great treatment. 

I would give them a 10 out of 10 for support. They are very responsive. We deal with a lot of other cloud solution providers who have tried to save money on support. It could be that because Cribl is new and they really want to make sure all new customers are being successful, but we really hope this continues. We don't feel we're alone.

The only alternative I can compare Cribl to would be Azure Data Transformation, Azure Data Time configuration rules and policies, basically making the storage source sort the data, and that is very painful. I don't see any next-best options when it comes to Cribl. They seem to be a leader and standing alone in their service offering, specific to Cribl Stream. For other products such as Cribl Lake, there's now Microsoft Sentinel Lake, which is a competitor, and I haven't really analyzed the pricing to see how competitive that is. But regarding Cribl Stream, there's no close competitor. The closest is extremely painful, requiring about 20 pages of configuration to even get close.

It's straightforward. They have a really nice user interface, and their service engineers will guide you through the initial setup. Since they are compensated based on product usage, they ensure that we are properly onboarded and that our experience is as successful as possible.

To deploy Cribl probably took an hour. Identifying all the different log sources that we wanted to bring in took about another eight hours of human work as it was a data exercise of determining which log sources are important to us, and where we can get the best compression or data size reduction. You can connect to them all automatically, but you want to have the thought process of which ones matter and what actual data you need. 

It does not require any maintenance on my end. The big thing is just checking connector health to make sure everything is running and that logs aren't dropping and that there haven't been any changes. In case there's any outage, putting in a ticket for any outage issues is very minimal. It's set it and forget it, and then just monitor to make sure nothing's bad or nothing has gone wrong.

We're a large organization, so we have a team of about five people who worked on the deployment of Cribl. I'm sure smaller organizations could use a lot less. We probably could have gotten away with two or three people. Not to say one person couldn't do it, but it's always good to have another person putting eyes on the process just so that we don't have a single point of failure.

The pricing has been increasing year-over-year, and I understand that the cost of business continues to grow. The cost of log retention and all the aspects they're fighting against, they are also a victim of. It is a concern that I'm watching as they raise prices about 10% year-over-year. I am still observing significant cost savings, although the amount of savings is gradually decreasing. Additionally, they are currently the sole provider of this type of solution, which means they face no competitive threats.

I would rate Cribl a ten out of ten. I truly appreciate them as partners. They genuinely feel like they're with us on this journey to manage the increasing volume of data. It's been exciting to watch them grow. At first, I thought I was a bit of a nerd for being an early adopter, but seeing so many others come on board after us reassures me that we made the right decision.

I use Cribl in a data management platform for IT security teams. My use cases include Stream, Edge, Search, and Lake.

I appreciate data routing the most about Cribl. I use it for data routing, data processing, and integration support. Cribl's ability to handle high volumes of diverse data types such as logs and metrics is impressive. It can easily handle logs because it is highly scalable and built to process millions of events per second, making it very easy to use.

What I dislike about Cribl are the documentation gaps and the setup complexity.

I have been working with Cribl for one year.

Regarding stability, once the pipelines were properly set up, the ongoing maintenance was minimal and mostly involved small adjustments rather than major changes. Overall, Cribl is not maintenance heavy, but sometimes maintenance is needed.Cribl requires some maintenance on my end; it is relatively low compared to traditional log pipelines.

Cribl provides high availability through distributed architecture, so we can achieve this by developing multiple workers and using load balancing to ensure continuous data flow even during failures in the pipeline.

The initial deployment is medium because the setup is complex. It took me some time to set it up for the first time because my friend helped me, but I found it difficult.

I have not seen a significant decrease in firewall logs while working with Cribl because it is highly scalable, so that much decrease has not occurred.

I have been using Cribl for about a year in my career. As a consultant, my job nature involves working with clients and coming up with solutions. Many of my clients are interested in observability, so I evaluated Cribl as a potential tool for their needs. Cribl is a relatively new product, and I have been involved with it since last year.

What I appreciate most about Cribl is that it addresses a major gap in the market compared to the competition. Splunk is extremely expensive, and many of my clients are financial institutions, including big banks, insurance companies, and fintech payment companies in Canada. While they already have Splunk installed, it is costly and sometimes does not meet their needs. Cribl offers significant advantages because from the source, you can collect all the data you want and filter and transform it.

In recent years, many of my clients are focused on fraud prevention, AML compliance, and regulatory requirements. They have numerous MRAs that they need to remediate and show evidence for. Cribl provides better control over data sourcing and allows them to demonstrate good control of their data.

I appreciate that Cribl provides better control of data from the source, which translates to better control over the cost of data and complexity. Many of my clients have sources of data across different platforms, and Cribl allows them to manage data from all these different sources in one place.

One area for improvement would be the certification path for Cribl. I understand there is a need for higher-end certifications, but it would be beneficial to also create certifications that are more accessible for business people or consultants. The current engineer certification is quite rigorous and not easy to pass. While keeping that rigorous option, providing another option for business or consultant users to get certified would be valuable.

I have been using Cribl for about a year.

Regarding stability, I have not experienced any lagging, crashing, or downtime with Cribl.

I believe Cribl is suitable for both large corporations and the small and medium business market. Some of my clients are very large banks in Canada, including one of the largest banks in the country. However, I also work with smaller clients, such as smaller insurance companies. Cribl performs effectively across both market segments.

I have contacted technical support for issues and had a positive experience. I started by opening a ticket from their website. I have dealt with other vendor products in the past where support was unresponsive, but Cribl's support is very good. I was pleasantly surprised by their quality and speed of response. I would rank their support at an eight out of ten, though I acknowledge that I tend to be overly critical.

Positive

While I have not personally tried similar solutions, my clients have been using Splunk, which is the most comparable solution they have relied on for a long time.

I have not done an actual deployment myself, but my understanding is that the initial deployment is easy.

Regarding maintenance on the client's end, there is some administration required. Standard updates from Cribl, such as security fixes and bug fixes, are typical maintenance tasks. I would need to review the specific details to provide a more comprehensive answer about all required maintenance.

I do not know the exact pricing because as a consultant, I am not privy to the exact numbers my clients are paying. Pricing often includes deals and investments from vendors. However, based on feedback from my clients, Splunk is more expensive, and Cribl appears to be more affordable.

Regarding pricing for Cribl, I cannot speak to exact numbers because as a consultant, the clients handle the financial details. Deals between vendors like Splunk and Cribl often involve special investments, so the pricing varies. Based on what my clients have shared, Splunk is significantly more expensive, and Cribl appears to offer better value.

I contacted technical support for issues and had a very positive experience. I would give this review an overall rating of eight out of ten.

Cribl is used for log management and SIEM in terms of optimization of the data that we are collecting.

The flexibility that Cribl provides allows us to manage the data and work with the data effectively.

Implementing Cribl has optimized the infrastructure that we have and is improving the optimization of the services that we are providing.

Other than the Cribl module that we are using, Cribl Search has several modules, so there is room to improve that capability in Cribl.

In Cribl Search, the language and the flexibility in querying the data can be improved because it is not as good as other solutions.

Cribl Search does not currently help search data in place for investigative issues or answer questions across our data stores at this moment because we are not using it at that level yet, but hopefully in the future.

I would advise others looking to implement Cribl that if they are evolving Cribl Search, it would be very interesting to see more capability, more flexibility, and more ways to share the data similar to Splunk.

I have around three and a half years of experience working with Cribl.

Cribl's stability is an eight.

For scalability, I would rate it a ten.

I would rate the technical support as an eight.

I would compare Cribl with other solutions or vendors as mature. We have seen another solution similar but not as mature as Cribl at the moment.

I am talking about the Data Stream Processor from Splunk and also Omnium from Spain.

Cribl is easy to deploy; the team managing the deployment did not report any concerns about the complexity of the deployment of the solution.

The deployment is straightforward; it is just a matter of coordination with other teams, but everything was released in one day.

Regarding the firewall logs with Cribl, the digression of the data that we are experiencing thanks to Cribl is amazing. Although I cannot provide exact numbers, the reduction is significant.

I use Cribl Stream, Cribl Lake, and Cribl Search. My experience with Cribl Search and Cribl Lake is just initial; we are just starting to use them. Cribl Stream is the optimization we are using right now in terms of data collection and data management and is more mature.

Cribl Search has changed my approach to long-term log retention and historical investigation.

I would rate this review an eight overall.