We performed a comparison between Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows [EOL] and Veritas NetBackup Appliance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Zerto, Commvault and others in Backup and Recovery."Veeam is very useful for the Hyper-V environment."
"I don't have any major problems with the agent connectivity with Microsoft applications or Microsoft Azure."
"Veeam helps to create a stable environment with virtual servers."
"The product is free to use. We don't have to pay for a license."
"Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows's most useful features is the ease of use and user-friendly."
"The installation of Veeam Agent is straightforward."
"This is a good product with a simple environment."
"Veeam is very user-friendly and intuitive software."
"The solution is very scalable."
"The solution uses minimal resources."
"The tool's most valuable feature is recovery."
"The most valuable feature involves VMware Instant Recovery, which allows one to do restoration within seconds."
"The reporting is very good compared to other tools."
"They are a large company with good best practices, and they give good support."
"We can add multiple appliances to the product."
"Technical support has been great."
"Some customers have Oracle databases and Veeam does support back up of Oracle databases."
"I would like there to be more integration with other platforms."
"The stability of this solution needs to be improved."
"The solution could use some updates to minor details omitted from current reporting."
"There isn't really anything I would like to improve. Maybe the solution could be more secure."
"The predictability of the solution needs improvement. Sometimes, if it's doing something at the back end, it may go slow. Today, the backup completion took four hours, but sometimes it can do the backup in 30 minutes or an hour. With solutions like NetBackup, I can predict to a much higher degree of certainty how long something will take to complete."
"It is not always easy to update this solution to the newer version, so the update process needs to be improved."
"The solution lacks instant recovery."
"The installation is cumbersome."
"The monitoring could be a bit better."
"It is not easy because I have worked a lot on the tool, and in case it gets corrupted at any point, it is not easy to restore the data without losing information is not easy."
"Depending on the setup structure, it can be complex to implement."
"It could be better integrated with other platforms."
"The price needs to be improved because it is really expensive."
"They could simplify the process of installing, and provide more space for data during the process."
"The hybrid model is not that efficient if we want to off-site data; it takes a lot of time to upload the data on a regular basis."
More Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Backup and Recovery with 40 reviews while Veritas NetBackup Appliance is ranked 20th in Backup and Recovery with 46 reviews. Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows [EOL] is rated 8.4, while Veritas NetBackup Appliance is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows [EOL] writes "Functional application availability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Veritas NetBackup Appliance writes "Offers good connectivity, easy to use and stable solution ". Veeam Agent for Microsoft Windows [EOL] is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Dell Avamar, Acronis Cyber Protect, AWS Backup and Dell PowerProtect Data Manager, whereas Veritas NetBackup Appliance is most compared with Veritas NetBackup, Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain), DD Boost, ExaGrid EX Series and HPE StoreOnce.
See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
