We performed a comparison between Trellix Endpoint Security and Trend Vision One based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Extended Detection and Response (XDR) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Microsoft Defender XDR provides strong identity protection with comprehensive insights into risky user behavior and potential indicators of compromise."
"In Microsoft 365 vendor products, monitoring and connectivity across all Microsoft and third-party connectors enable viewing of all activity within those environments."
"The threat intelligence is excellent."
"Another noteworthy feature that I find appealing in Microsoft Defender is the credit-backed simulation. This feature enables organizations to train their users on effectively responding to phishing emails through a simulated training environment."
"The 'Incidents and Alerts' tab is a valuable feature where we can find triggered alerts."
"The comprehensiveness of Microsoft's threat detection is good."
"Advanced hunting is good. I like that. We can drill down to lots of details."
"The portal is quite user-friendly. There is integration with Office, Intune, and other products from the same portal. From there, we can see which policies are installed on a particular machine. We also can manage devices, groups, and tagging."
"The solution is reliable."
"It has a very simple like multi-tenancy option and scalability is outstanding."
"It's easy to use."
"Some of McAfee Endpoint Security's main features are it has benefits over normal conventional antivirus solutions because it works much faster."
"The endpoint protection and disk encryption features are the most valuable."
"Anyone can use it, the protection is good, and they have all of the features."
"The product’s stability and security features enhance user protection and organizational security."
"The initial setup of Trellix Endpoint Security was straightforward."
"The centralized visibility is good."
"For scalability, I would give a rating of ten out of ten."
"For our day-to-day use cases, the correlation and attribution of different alerts are valuable. It is sort of an SIEM, but it is intelligent enough to run the queries and intentionally detect and prioritize attacks for you. At the end of the day, it is different data that you see. It correlates data for you and makes it meaningful. You can see that someone got an email and clicked a link. That link downloaded, for example, malware into the memory of the machine. From there, you can see that they started moving laterally to your environment. I quite like it because it gives visibility, so Workbench is what we use every day"
"They were one of the companies, early on, that spent a lot of time integrating their toolsets, and I was really impressed with that... the endpoint management system could reach out to the Deep Discovery system on the network and pick up something that it perceived as a suspicious object."
"I like the workbench. It is a view of all the alerts or problems in your estate. The visibility that it provides to engineers is very useful. It is one thing having lots of alerts. It is another thing to have something to correlate all your alerts into a workbench for you so that you can see what is going on."
"Trend Micro XDR is stable, scalable, and reasonably priced."
"The zero-day vulnerability is valuable."
"I appreciate the value of real-time activity monitoring."
"Generally, antivirus products provide a central control to manage every device in terms of who is installing it or who is trying to disable it, but Microsoft doesn't have such a control center for the antivirus product it provides."
"Offboarding latency should be reduced. Even after a device has been successfully offboarded using a particular offboarding script, it still shows up as onboarded."
"A simple dashboard without having to use MS Sentinel would be a welcome improvement."
"The interface could be improved. For example, if you want to do a phishing simulation for your employees, it can take a while to figure out what to do. The interface is a bit messy and could be updated. It isn't too bad, but doing some things can be a long process."
"The support from Microsoft could improve. There are times I have to wait for a response from a qualified specialist."
"The support team is not competent or responsive."
"Advanced attacks could use an improvement."
"Since all of our databases are updated and located in the cloud, I would like additional support for this."
"The solution should provide a more easy way to uninstall it on specific stations."
"There are more secure featured solutions from McAfee on the market but for smaller companies like ours, they are too expensive."
"Tech support is not as helpful as they were in the past."
"The management console is a little bit difficult to understand for admins. You need a lot of time in order to become familiar with that. It is a little bit complicated and not too easy to understand. Its price can also be improved. Its price is higher than its competitors. McAfee also needs to have better cloud integration and more data centers in the EU. The cloud center should be in Europe or in Germany. In Germany, it is really important to have access to your data within the same country. Customer data needs to be placed and processed in the same country."
"The platform needs improvement in terms of handling heavy databases."
"The solution needs to offer better local technical support."
"The solution takes up a high amount of memory and can cause the system to hang."
"The DAC (Dynamic Application Containment) component of this product needs improvement."
"I think that continued optimization of the environment towards automation and orchestration, a kind of layer that sits underneath all of the technologies, would be extremely important."
"The agent system is very slow, it needs to improve its performance."
"We do use the automation capability a little. However, we noticed some limitations, especially on the playbook side."
"There isn't a lot I'd do to change it. The web interface could be improved to sort of make it a little easier to manage multiple clients out of one location. It could also be made a bit easier to sort of manage the licensing side of it."
"We've received some mild complaints that the documentation is sometimes not up to date."
"It would be better if it were more user-friendly. It would also be better if the implementation were more straightforward."
"While the continuous addition of features is commendable, the sheer volume of changes makes it difficult to stay abreast of the latest developments."
"The centralized dashboard has room for improvement."
Trellix Endpoint Security is ranked 10th in Extended Detection and Response (XDR) with 94 reviews while Trend Vision One is ranked 6th in Extended Detection and Response (XDR) with 42 reviews. Trellix Endpoint Security is rated 8.0, while Trend Vision One is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Trellix Endpoint Security writes "Good user behavioral analysis and helpful patching but needs better support services". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Vision One writes "The integration of toolsets is key, enabling automation, and vendor has been tremendous partner for us". Trellix Endpoint Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS), CrowdStrike Falcon, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and Trend Micro Deep Security, whereas Trend Vision One is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, Trend Micro Apex One and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint. See our Trellix Endpoint Security vs. Trend Vision One report.
See our list of best Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vendors and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Extended Detection and Response (XDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
