We performed a comparison between SailPoint IdentityIQ and Tools4ever HelloID based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Okta, Google and others in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)."This solution is easy to configure."
"The tool is quite stable and user-friendly."
"Access certification and provisioning are two of the solutions most valuable features."
"It significantly reduces the workload for certification processes."
"The initial setup isn't so difficult."
"Has a great certification module with intuitive options."
"The first valuable feature of the solution is its interface. The second feature of the solution is the level of flexibility it provides."
"One of the most valuable aspects of SailPoint is its open integration interface."
"Now we can easily control who has access to which client or client application."
"The Single Sign-On capabilities are endless and we haven't found a single app so far that couldn't be set up for SSO."
"You don't need to be a specialist in Identity and Access Management solutions to understand the software and configure it."
"The most valuable feature is the option to use SSO from different sources such as Microsoft AD, ADFS, Azure AD, SAML, form-based, etc."
"The user interface is not very user-friendly."
"Compared to at least one other product some of the administrative tasks could be easier or more intuitive."
"The product must improve its support."
"Needs to focus on automation wherein provisioning of work can be improved and access certification should be automated without the intervention from a manager for approval."
"The product’s cloud offering could be flexible."
"The report functionality and dashboard of the access manager could be improved."
"They can work on their strategy for the on-premise version. They have to decide whether and for how long they will support the on-premise version. The new features first appear in the cloud, and after that, they are released for the on-premise version. In the cloud, you have more options and flexibility, which is absolutely normal. They have to have a clear strategy regarding whether they'll support the on-premises version with the same focus. The licensing for on-premise and cloud is a little bit different. They can make it the same."
"The product has poor reporting and analytic capabilities. Reports are not easy to use and its analytic capabilities are limited."
"I would like to have the built-in provisioning module improved."
"Sometimes it generates a username that is not unique, but at the time of this writing, it is not possible to generate a new one that is unique."
"When something needs to be changed with the sign-on policies, we have to apply this manually to every client environment that we have."
"Integration with other Tools4ever applications such as SSRPM and IAM would be nice."
Earn 20 points
SailPoint IdentityIQ is ranked 4th in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) with 61 reviews while Tools4ever HelloID is ranked 24th in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS). SailPoint IdentityIQ is rated 8.2, while Tools4ever HelloID is rated 9.8. The top reviewer of SailPoint IdentityIQ writes "Flexible, easy to customize, and not too difficult to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tools4ever HelloID writes "A flexible solution for application management, and facilitated centralization of our IAM". SailPoint IdentityIQ is most compared with Saviynt, Microsoft Entra ID, One Identity Manager, ForgeRock and Okta Workforce Identity, whereas Tools4ever HelloID is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, Microsoft Entra External ID and Imprivata OneSign.
See our list of best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
