We performed a comparison between Oracle Dyn Web Application Security and Zscaler Internet Access based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."The initial setup is pretty easy."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine and a half out of ten...The setup phase was easy."
"The data loss prevention feature is the most valuable. It stops our users from inadvertently leaking our customers' data to the Internet or anywhere else it shouldn't go."
"The VPN is valuable, as the whole technology is very different from a traditional VPN."
"The most valuable feature of Zscaler Internet Access is that it is a consolidated solution, it comes with many features, such as DLP."
"The best thing about Zscaler Internet Access is the website filtering. In the UAE it's quite an important feature because most of the malware comes through the SQL injection and through downloads from websites. Zscaler helps protect against that."
"The policies are very intuitive and easy to configure, with very little possibility of messing things up."
"There is no lag in service when accessing the internet."
"The URL filtering has been the most valuable feature."
"The solution should have a Data Mask for the next release. It would be helpful for banking institutions as they would be able to hide the server number of the ATM machine in the CPU."
"The price of the solution could be improved."
"It also needs better integration with other applications as well. There are some restrictions."
"Zscaler Internet Access's troubleshooting is very limited, and their textbook logs need to be more informative."
"Zscaler should provide adjacent services, which would be complementary to their current offering that could to be more pragmatic for a customer. For example, if you take Akamai, you get multiple sets of services, all depending on the customer and the strategy and the complexity and the problems. In some areas, they are more varied in terms of coverage."
"Do not expect to pay for the service and start using it, like Gmail. Zscaler requires a proper implementation to be done to make it successful."
"Zscaler does not provide dedicated IPs to each customer. Hence, they share a pool of IPs provided by Zscaler. There is a chance of blacklisting these IPs. I also do not like the multi-management portal."
"The interface for administration could be better. They should upgrade the management portal."
"In terms of user experience, it could be better."
Earn 20 points
Oracle Dyn Web Application Security is ranked 50th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) while Zscaler Internet Access is ranked 2nd in Secure Web Gateways (SWG) with 46 reviews. Oracle Dyn Web Application Security is rated 9.0, while Zscaler Internet Access is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Oracle Dyn Web Application Security writes "Very secure with an easy initial setup and pretty stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zscaler Internet Access writes "Provides integrated CASB and file sandboxing but could be less expensive ". Oracle Dyn Web Application Security is most compared with , whereas Zscaler Internet Access is most compared with Cisco Umbrella, Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps, Netskope , Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks and FortiSASE .
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.