We performed a comparison between One Identity Safeguard and senhasegura Access Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM)."The transparent mode for privileged sessions is one of the best things for customers, because they don't see the system in-between."
"It's a good solution for managing identities under OneFile for authorization."
"We use the solution’s “transparent mode” feature for privileged sessions. It is very easy because it is only a simple configuration for our users. We don't have to modify our network. We install it, configure it, and it works. So, it is super easy. The rollout for our users is seamless."
"It is easy to manage. There is a very logical, clear user interface. Also, the integration of scripts is thoughtfully implemented. Overall, it's a nice product to manage."
"The system is easy to manage, as it is not a system that you will change everything all of a sudden. It evolves most of the time with customer requests."
"The solution transparently integrates into the infrastructure and users do not notice it. I would give this feature the highest rating."
"I have found the most useful feature of One Identity Safeguard to be Privileged Sessions."
"I like Safeguard's snapshot feature that enables us to review the last time an application was opened and by whom. If there are any issues, we can look behind the scenes to see what has been done. We can suspend a user's access or close off a server."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The GUI has room for improvement because it is confusing and cumbersome."
"Something for One Identity to look at is having integration guidelines for how to logically group accounts."
"For some users, the physical appliance has been a bit buggy."
"The deployment affects our privileged users because it takes a long time for them to request privileges, which impacts the SLA."
"When we compare One Identity Safeguard with Cyberark, we know CyberArk has other tools or other features that are more complex and more useful for the customers. For example, I have one customer that wants to elevate the permission that is available in CyberArk."
"Some of the out-of-the-box reporting isn't that rich. We spoke to our Safeguard reps who have acknowledged that some of the reporting features can certainly be improved and that we're not the only customer who has cited this. There are very little out-of-the-box reporting capabilities. You have to build the queries and the report. I believe in the next release they're going to be addressing this."
"We would like to be able to generate certificate signing requests (CSRs) from the interface for certificates."
"The main point regarding the user experience is that Safeguard has two separate management consoles."
"In Linux credential discovery was a bit hard, but after Senhasegura's latest update, it is much easier."
One Identity Safeguard is ranked 4th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 38 reviews while senhasegura Access Management is ranked 14th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 1 review. One Identity Safeguard is rated 8.2, while senhasegura Access Management is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of One Identity Safeguard writes "Provides us with centralized storage of secrets and credentials, and visibility into the use of privileged access". On the other hand, the top reviewer of senhasegura Access Management writes "With a great support team and stability, the tool also offers scalability to its users". One Identity Safeguard is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, WALLIX Bastion, Delinea Secret Server, BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access and Fudo PAM, whereas senhasegura Access Management is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and ManageEngine PAM360.
See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
