We performed a comparison between Mule Anypoint Platform and OpenText Trading Grid based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft, Microsoft, Oracle and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)."The most valuable feature is the variety of characters Anypoint Platform has. It is very scalable and customizable."
"The initial setup is quite easy because the solution has a good interface through which the configuration, mapping, and so on can be done."
"The solution's deployment and proxy processes are very good."
"The solution's market place for different kinds of integration platforms is the most valuable feature."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is a huge list of available connectors for a lot of different platforms, which we can use very easily."
"Mule Anypoint Platform's valuable features are its flexibility in terms of deployment and its SaaS capabilities."
"Mule works very well with Salesforce and CRMs."
"The tool is very capable and offers a high performance. The tool supports batch processing and ETL processing."
"The solution is easy to implement."
"Adding connectors for new upcoming applications would add extra value to this product."
"The high price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"Better documentation, in particular with respect to the initial setup, would be helpful."
"The solution's pricing model is very strange, and it will be really expensive if you use APIs a lot."
"This becomes an expensive solution over time."
"The solution's licensing methodologies could be improved."
"It would be better if we had a clearer view of the solution's future releases."
"Mule Anypoint Platform could improve by having more up-to-date adapters to do work in a digital space."
"Technical support needs to be better."
Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 1st in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 40 reviews while OpenText Trading Grid is ranked 15th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 1 review. Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2, while OpenText Trading Grid is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Trading Grid writes "Industry-leading, easy to implement, and has good mapping specification guidelines". Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Process Orchestration and SAP Cloud Platform, whereas OpenText Trading Grid is most compared with IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services, TrueCommerce EDI, SPS Commerce Fulfillment (EDI), SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite and SAP Cloud Platform.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors, best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors, and best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.