We performed a comparison between ManageEngine OpManager and Micro Focus Network Management Center [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in Network Monitoring Software."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"The alerting feature has improved our organization. We can create multiple alerts and refine them to how we need to use them."
"We find the networking aspect of this solution to be the most valuable."
"The solution offers very good integration capabilities."
"The detections are fine when they work."
"It helps us a lot for monitoring our servers in one console, instead of going to individual servers."
"The most valuable feature of ManageEngine OpManager is the management of the virtual machine and the host machine."
"The product provides intensive reports."
"Defining thresholds and other alerting criteria is fairly simple and would not require a lot of training. This is very useful if you are managing a large environment."
"We have visibility on all our network devices, through this tool, which gives me immediate alerts or notifications when some devices fail."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"ManageEngine OpManager could improve by having a better cloud presence."
"Needs an OVA, or more support for virtual deployments. Building a virtual instance of OpManager and OpManager Probe was a bit difficult because there was no OVA available."
"The two views into the system are very good but could be extended to further customization to fit the need of end users in a variety of roles."
"There are certain things that are not possible to do with Op Manager. It's a solution that still needs time to develop."
"Some of our customers have been asking that OpManager have a feature to monitor the operating system, however, I tell them that Endpoint Central is doing that. You can buy endpoints and then OpManager, and they integrate between them, and everything is okay."
"The main area for improvement for ManageEngine OpManager is its performance."
"It would be great if there were some sort of artificial intelligence feature which would help us make improvements in the network once we find an issue, and do it automatically."
"You cannot resolve 100 percent of the issues yourself. You would need to reach out to the support. It needs to be cheaper."
"The only thing I can say needs improvement is in how they present the data to the end users. End users are looking for a dashboard with an attractive view. The current dashboards we have are sufficient for our needs, but not attractive for the business users at the upper management levels."
More Micro Focus Network Management Center [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
ManageEngine OpManager is ranked 15th in Network Monitoring Software with 44 reviews while Micro Focus Network Management Center [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Network Monitoring Software. ManageEngine OpManager is rated 8.0, while Micro Focus Network Management Center [EOL] is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of ManageEngine OpManager writes "Helps us monitor all the infrastructure in our company but UI monitoring is not practical". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus Network Management Center [EOL] writes "Easy to use, powerful and flexible. However there are bugs to work through". ManageEngine OpManager is most compared with SolarWinds NPM, Zabbix, PRTG Network Monitor, SCOM and Nagios XI, whereas Micro Focus Network Management Center [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
