We performed a comparison between Kryon RPA and Python RPA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about UiPath, Microsoft, Automation Anywhere and others in Robotic Process Automation (RPA)."The task mining aspect has been the most valuable for us. That's why we actually bought it."
"[One of the valuable features] is the triggers. It's relatively simple to activate it. You can activate it via Control-M or via email. It has a lot of built-in triggers which enable us to easily activate the jobs."
"The advanced Excel functionalities are really convenient because we work a lot with spreadsheets. It’s also easy to use the HTML selectors. It’s just a click and it picks it up. There’s not a lot of no hard-coding with it."
"Kryon RPA is very stable - we've not had many disruptions, and the product is updated regularly."
"The full-service automation aspects and the process discovery are the most valuable features of Kryon RPA."
"We took a very complex business area, and every activity in it which can be done automatically is being replaced by the robot instead of people working on it."
"Attended automation has diverted 34 percent of training calls to our tech support centers."
"The bot is typically about twice as fast as a person and more accurate, as long as the data going in is good. That is the biggest advantage."
"Instead of writing multiple lines of code, we can do it in a single statement."
"Keyword-driven automation has been beneficial in streamlining operations."
"At first, we had problems with the object detection but in this latest release it has been better, and I think it keeps getting better."
"The process discovery tool of Kryon RPA could be improved because of its limitations."
"Extracting meaningful data requires significant effort. You need a dedicated business analyst who can understand the output."
"Often, it's difficult to loop through a large data set unless the bot has access to the Excel file with specific settings and shortcodes."
"I would like to see a better OCR solution. That's the main thing: identifying unstructured data, like all paper documents and data from pictures."
"It could be more reliable in spying HTML."
"Another major drawback is OCR. We are not able to read scanned documents correctly in a reliable way. There is always some margin of error. Some of the processes require us to read scanned documents, and you need to ensure that it is 100 percent accurate. Without that level of assurance, you can't automate such tasks."
"It would be better to have [upgrades] done automatically, like an application on your smartphone. Or even if done manually, the upgrade should just be "next, next, next," and it's upgraded, rather than making it a project to upgrade."
"When we call an API and there is an error, it doesn't tell you what the error is."
"Support could be improved."
Kryon RPA is ranked 13th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 26 reviews while Python RPA is ranked 23rd in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 2 reviews. Kryon RPA is rated 8.4, while Python RPA is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Kryon RPA writes "The tool helps with speed to market, efficiency, and accuracy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Python RPA writes "Helps streamline operations, the error handling capability is fairly good, and integrations are easy". Kryon RPA is most compared with UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, Blue Prism, Nintex RPA and Automation Anywhere (AA), whereas Python RPA is most compared with Microsoft Power Automate.
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
