We performed a comparison between Matillion ETL and Tungsten RPA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product has a good user interface."
"It is pretty user-friendly, even for people who aren't super technical."
"The technical support treats us well. They already have a support portal, and they are responsive, which helps."
"We allow non-technical people to use Matillion to load data into our data warehouse for reporting. Thus, it is easy enough to use that we don't always have to get a technical person involved in setting up a data movement (ETL)."
"It's highly scalable. It takes upon itself the Redshift scalability, so it's very good."
"It has good integrations with Amazon Redshift and other AWS services."
"The tool's middle-dimensional structure significantly simplifies obtaining the right data at the appropriate level. This feature makes deploying our applications easier since we utilize a single source without publishing data from various sources."
"The most valuable feature of Matillion ETL is the ETL. The solution is open-source which provides advantages, such as good performance and high efficiency. Additionally, it supports three data types which eliminates predefining the data, and we can write script models in Python."
"The most valuable feature of Kofax RPA is the simplicity of automating tasks."
"Kofax RPA's best feature is its high success percentage in picking up information from documents, especially where the DPI is really low."
"The solution is scalable."
"The features that we have found the most valuable are the integration of different third-party support and productivity services."
"Provides valuable tools working in integration with RPA tools."
"The ability to script information from websites is most valuable. It also seems to be fairly robust and reasonably easy to manage on a server-based deployment. We have a number of robots operating on the central server."
"This is a stable platform and we did not encounter any big problems."
"It is very simple and easy to learn compared to any other RPA tools such as UiPath, Automation Anywhere and Blue Prism."
"While the UI is good, it could be improved in its efficiency and made easier to use."
"Matillion’s on-premises capabilities don’t allow you to build something customized."
"To complete the pipeline, they might want to include some connectors which would put the data into different platforms. This would be helpful."
"The current version is a bit more limited because it's on a virtual machine, and everything executes on that one virtual machine."
"Performance can be improved for efficiency, and it can be made faster."
"The product must enhance its near-real-time data capture feature."
"Sometimes, we have issues with the solution's stability and need to restart it for three weeks or more."
"The tool's lineage is very weak."
"I'd like to see a recording function and a more simple interface."
"I would like to see them further enhance the OCR, specifically in the multi-language support."
"The scalability has room for improvement."
"The interface could be better from a usability standpoint."
"The process discovery could be a bit better."
"We are on version 10.6, and the current version seems to be 11. Kofax is cycling the capabilities of the product very quickly. One of the difficulties has been to actually keep up with the capabilities as they've evolved. On the one hand, it is good that the product is getting better, but on the other hand, it is difficult to implement the best way with a product that is evolving constantly."
"Kofax RPA could improve web-based automation and there should be a choice of what browser we can use, such as Google Chrome, instead of an inbuilt browser from Kofax RPA. Additionally, Kofax RPA is missing an orchestrator that other solutions have, such as UiPath."
"Kofax RPA's UI could be more user-friendly."
Matillion ETL is ranked 4th in Cloud Data Integration with 24 reviews while Tungsten RPA is ranked 12th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 24 reviews. Matillion ETL is rated 8.6, while Tungsten RPA is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Matillion ETL writes "Efficient data integration and transformation with seamless cloud-native integration". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tungsten RPA writes "A stable product that provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems". Matillion ETL is most compared with Snowflake, Azure Data Factory, AWS Glue, Informatica PowerCenter and SSIS, whereas Tungsten RPA is most compared with UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, Blue Prism, Automation Anywhere (AA) and SAS Data Management. See our Matillion ETL vs. Tungsten RPA report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.