We performed a comparison between Keeper and SailPoint IdentityIQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, HashiCorp, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Enterprise Password Managers."I like the tool's keyword editor and SSO."
"It has a secure password generator that incorporates random creation tools and good security practices, which allows for an easy, quick, organized update and sharing with a work team."
"Chrome extension and app."
"It saves us from duplicating passwords for different accounts."
"Password sharing and SSO. These features almost become a necessity to make sure that company data is safe and reduce the possibility of data breach."
"The installation and its use are very simple."
"It is nice to be able to use my Touch ID and have access to all my passwords in one place."
"I like Keeper's mobility and its accessibility."
"The most valuable feature for our customers and for us is the identity data warehouse."
"User provisioning and the role management features are good."
"Has a great certification module with intuitive options."
"This solution is easy to configure."
"This solution is great for providing control access across your environment."
"Good life cycle management, segregation of duties, and analytics features."
"The compliance features are the most valuable features."
"Provides functionalities for various stages, such as joiner, mover, and leaver"
"Maybe a sort of category organizer to help with organizing passwords for different things, such as banking, medical, shopping, and school."
"I would add a category for personal documents or photos of ID cards."
"The technical support has no experience."
"I would like to see a way to store files and photos in the next update. If it already does this, I have yet to explore it."
"Its aesthetic needs improvement."
"If you purchase the premium, then after the subscription expires, you cannot edit your passwords any longer, even if you could before you purchased the paid subscription."
"I would love it if you didn't have to re-authenticate when you start up a new browser."
"The user experience and the mobile app could be improved."
"The report functionality and dashboard of the access manager could be improved."
"One needs to understand that SailPoint is into full-fledged IAM practice with a long-term vision, and customers will get a quick ROI with best practices implementation."
"It tends to be more expensive, but at the end of the day, it works."
"What it doesn't do is provide notice in the event of a vulnerability or offense from the security."
"There are various functions that don't work in IdentityIQ, including the access request reminder, which doesn't go to the approvals in the proper format, so it's hard for users to read."
"The user interface could be slightly improved. It could be made simpler and more user-friendly, however, it is good enough right now."
"If you compare Saviynt and Okta Workforce Identity versus SailPoint IdentityIQ, SailPoint IdentityIQ needs to improve its UI."
"The advanced provisioning features require more improvement."
Keeper is ranked 10th in Enterprise Password Managers with 32 reviews while SailPoint IdentityIQ is ranked 1st in User Provisioning Software with 61 reviews. Keeper is rated 9.2, while SailPoint IdentityIQ is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Keeper writes "It's an inexpensive, scalable solution that has improved our security". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SailPoint IdentityIQ writes "Flexible, easy to customize, and not too difficult to set up". Keeper is most compared with HashiCorp Vault, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Azure Key Vault and LastPass, whereas SailPoint IdentityIQ is most compared with Saviynt, Microsoft Entra ID, One Identity Manager, ForgeRock and Okta Workforce Identity.
We monitor all Enterprise Password Managers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.