We performed a comparison between JD Edwards EnterpriseOne and SAP S/4HANA Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, Microsoft, Oracle and others in ERP."Access and visibility of different business processes on a single UI."
"It has simplified the process completely, and even though it has many features which are available in the market now, but it is on par with the other ERPs that are available in the market now."
"It’s a stable product."
"We do a straight forward, simple plug and play installation so there are no problems technically now."
"It is very straightforward to deploy and set up."
"The solution’s Accounts Payable and Procurement modules are the most stable and quite useful compared to other finance modules."
"The tool is valuable for its rich set of functionalities and stability. The solution is stable. The customer service and support is good."
"JD Edwards EnterpriseOne has improved within all the solutions and there have been a lot of investments by Oracle in these solutions. Most of the functionalities, and business requirements, are available for the system in the solution and there have been enhancements to the processes, UI, and tools, which have been done on a regular basis."
"It is a straightforward solution."
"It is good in data analytics and helps in data analytics."
"Makes it easier to reach and read data."
"What I like the most about SAP S4HANA is how reliable and powerful it is."
"The most valuable features of SAP S/4HANA Cloud are the detailed solution costing, integration, and built-in analytics."
"The integration is very stable."
"The most valuable feature of SAP S/4HANA Cloud is the new UX design."
"Managing the server and taking advantage of the services provided by SAP itself is the most valuable feature."
"They have the interface with Hubble and other reporting, however, we just want that to be a part of JD Edwards."
"The way of creating daily reports could be made a little bit easier."
"The Fixed Asset module is not desirable because it is complicated."
"The initial setup was complex...One should get the end-user manual because, in some parts, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is not user-friendly."
"We originally used EnterpriseOne for preventative maintenance, but it is not very good at that so we migrated to Maximo for that task."
"Needs better integration with IoT solutions."
"It does not submit the inquiry as requested. We have to close the application and restart the computer."
"Lacking in certain areas of support."
"They can improve the interface. It has a client-server kind of interface, which is kind of old."
"It's not easy to facilitate the solution between us and SAP, so we have had to leave those issues open."
"The solution could improve by adding a planning model, such as BPC. Additionally, if we need to make changes in the profit center it has to be done manually. It is not connected to the cost center."
"The user interface of SAP S/4HANA Cloud needs to be improved because it is not as good as other applications."
"The integration with third-party vendors could improve."
"The pricing is high."
"The implementation time for S/4HANA Cloud could be reduced."
"The only thing that could be improved would be the complexity of the initial setup."
JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is ranked 7th in ERP with 55 reviews while SAP S/4HANA Cloud is ranked 3rd in Cloud ERP with 41 reviews. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is rated 8.2, while SAP S/4HANA Cloud is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne writes "Simplifies processes, is easy to set up, and offers good integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP S/4HANA Cloud writes "A valuable tool for businesses seeking to enhance their overall performance and competitiveness in the digital era". JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is most compared with JD Edwards World, SAP ERP, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Oracle E-Business Suite and SAP S/4HANA, whereas SAP S/4HANA Cloud is most compared with SAP Business ByDesign, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP Business One, IFS Cloud Platform and SAP S/4HANA.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.