We performed a comparison between Informatica Cloud API and App Integration and webMethods Integration Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."The OAuth feature is the most valuable feature for authentication."
"The interface is really good."
"The application integration will give you more flexibility when dealing with APIs."
"The interface has a great look and feel, and the functionality is so easy."
"Broker and UM are the best features."
"One [of the most valuable features] is the webMethods Designer. That helps our developers develop on their own. It's very intuitive for design. It helps our developers to speed the development of services for the integrations."
"It has a good integration server, designer, and a very good API portal."
"The most valuable feature of the webMethods Integration Server is the built-in monitoring, auditing, RETS, and SOAP services."
"The Software AG Designer has been great. It's very intuitive."
"It's obvious that the heart of the product lies here. It's comprised of all aspects of ESB (Enterprise Gateway, Adapter, TN, Java) and BPM (task, rules engine)."
"webMethods Integration Server is an easy-to-use solution and does not require a lot of coding."
"From a user perspective, the feature which I like the most about Integration Server is its designer."
"There's no direct way to connect to Amazon APIs from Informatica Cloud."
"The setup is complex."
"There could be a lot more application integration."
"The pricing model is problematic."
"The stability of the various modules of the product suite have been a bit of a concern lately. Though their support team is always easy to reach out to, I would prefer it not come to that."
"wM SAP Adapter User Guide - Example, like Message Broker setup was unclear, leading to issues during Testing and we had refer the internet forums to understand that there is a Message Broker Cleanup utility and that needs to be setup as well."
"The interface needs some work. It is not very user-friendly."
"Forced migration from MessageBroker to Universal Messaging requires large scale reimplementation for JMS."
"This product has too many gaps. You find them after update installations. This should be covered by automatic testing."
"Support is expensive."
"As webMethods Integration Server is expensive, that's its area for improvement."
"We'd like for them to open up to a more cloud-based solution that could offer more flexibility and maybe a better rules engine or more integration with rules engines."
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
Informatica Cloud API and App Integration is ranked 18th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 4 reviews while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 60 reviews. Informatica Cloud API and App Integration is rated 8.6, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Informatica Cloud API and App Integration writes " Provides data governance and offer good scalability, with a significant performance boost when moving from on-prem to the cloud". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Event-driven with lots of helpful formats, but minimal learning resources available". Informatica Cloud API and App Integration is most compared with Apache Airflow, Pega BPM, Appian, ARIS Cloud and Camunda, whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods.io Integration, Mule ESB, TIBCO BusinessWorks and Boomi AtomSphere Integration.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.