We performed a comparison between IBM InfoSphere Information Server and Informatica Cloud Data Integration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."This solution is extremely flexible and scalable."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"IBM InfoSphere Information Server is stable."
"The integration with different technologies is the most valuable feature."
"The most valuable features of Informatica Cloud Data Integration for our clients are the AI capabilities within Informatica Intelligent Cloud Services."
"It is a scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten."
"I like the fact that you can find almost any product connection that you need and the list is always expanding."
"The support is very good."
"The most valuable feature of Informatica Cloud Data Integration is Pushback. You are able to push the data to the solution itself, and it can handle the queries. It helps us a lot. With other tools, the burden is kept on the server."
"The user interface which is very easy to use if we have any problems to solve."
"The mass ingestion functionality and the elasticity of the solution are great."
"It is quite easy to use and flexible."
"This solution would benefit from the engine being made more lightweight."
"Their technical support needs improvement."
"There are certain shortcomings in the cloud side of the solution, where improvements are required."
"IBM InfoSphere Information Server should be more scalable. It should have the option to change the configuration to run on a single, non-multiple node, or multi-threading processing."
"There are a small number of UI bugs that occur on occasion."
"The main issue preventing Brazilian companies from migrating to Informatica Cloud Data Integration from on-prem is the price."
"A general improvement in icons and the virtual interface would be good."
"The biggest challenge I see is the IDE's for the cloud and automization are different."
"The current features are a bit complicated, and we need to write big scripts and test."
"The integration process is not easy."
"With the solution, we had some issues, and we have every day, and we used to open a ticket. Sometimes, there are data issues and transformation issues."
"The cloud version could be better in terms of pricing."
More IBM InfoSphere Information Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Informatica Cloud Data Integration Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM InfoSphere Information Server is ranked 36th in Data Integration with 7 reviews while Informatica Cloud Data Integration is ranked 5th in Cloud Data Integration with 40 reviews. IBM InfoSphere Information Server is rated 8.4, while Informatica Cloud Data Integration is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of IBM InfoSphere Information Server writes "Prompt support, reliable, but lacking scalability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Informatica Cloud Data Integration writes "A stable, scalable, and user-friendly solution". IBM InfoSphere Information Server is most compared with IBM InfoSphere DataStage, Qlik Replicate, IBM Watson Knowledge Catalog, IBM Cloud Pak for Data and Oracle GoldenGate, whereas Informatica Cloud Data Integration is most compared with Informatica PowerCenter, Azure Data Factory, AWS Glue, Fivetran and Mule Anypoint Platform. See our IBM InfoSphere Information Server vs. Informatica Cloud Data Integration report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.