We performed a comparison between Delinea Secret Server and Fudo PAM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Number one is the password vault; it's very good. Number two, they have a feature for remote desktops that are created on a per session basis, which is very good for security."
"One valuable feature is that it will support a dedicated database. Delinea provides multiple features, like reporting and remote password changes."
"The secret template, password rotation, and recording sessions are the most valuable."
"The ability to give some groups access to different kind of databases with the storage of a password is the most valuable feature."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is that it provides us with a secure way of managing passwords."
"The surveillance is most valuable."
"I like that you can change the password remotely."
"It offers the possibility of secure administration of hardware devices, as well as Linux systems administration from a Windows environment."
"Session recording and password management are the two main aspects."
"Fudo PAM was the most flexible and intuitive interface out of all of the products in the PAM sector."
"We are convinced that Fudo PAM is better than competing products like WALLIX."
"it's perfect to control and administer computers in our company."
"The main benefit of the solution is that it's very easy to set up. It only takes a couple of hours to install everything."
"Its remote support feature needs improvement."
"The tool should integrate additional features like OCR."
"One thing that I wish they would do is to have a Kubernetes or container-based deployment supported, but they're not quite there yet. Containerization or support for containerization would be fantastic."
"I think that the main interface should integrate better with non-standard applications and clients, to connect with other systems."
"This product is excellent in every way except minor details in handling extremely large environments."
"I don't know what kind of a cryptographic it uses to encrypt the password but it should be one of the stronger ones. Some of the cryptos have been accessed by hackers."
"The API is no good."
"We find the documentation hard to understand."
"Professional training and certification would be great."
"Fudo PAM’s scalability is not very strong."
"The stability is not very good."
"I would like to see better server management. You have to know exactly what you're looking for to get the right server."
"The configuration is difficult."
Delinea Secret Server is ranked 2nd in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 47 reviews while Fudo PAM is ranked 21st in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 5 reviews. Delinea Secret Server is rated 8.2, while Fudo PAM is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Delinea Secret Server writes "Effective for password rotation policies triggered by audit requirements, it helps maintain compliance standards and seamless integration with third-party tools ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fudo PAM writes "Easy to install but needs to provide better server management and organization". Delinea Secret Server is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Azure Key Vault, HashiCorp Vault, IBM Security Secret Server and ManageEngine PAM360, whereas Fudo PAM is most compared with WALLIX Bastion, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, One Identity Safeguard, Teleport and ManageEngine PAM360. See our Delinea Secret Server vs. Fudo PAM report.
See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
