We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, Gemalto Protiva, and RSA Adaptive Authentication based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems."It reduces the need for network administrator intervention by allowing the user to perform their own registration and resolve their own password problems and issues."
"The product's on-premise version doesn't have recurring costs."
"The product’s most valuable feature is integration with FortiGate, FortiToken, FortiTalk, and multi-factor authentication."
"The product enables SSO."
"The product is good, cost-effective, and functionally efficient."
"I work a lot with Fortinet products and I call the support often. They are very quick to respond and the support is very good."
"The product is stable and reliable."
"Simple to deploy, simple to use, and user-friendly."
"The most valuable feature for us is the ability to use Active Directory groups as virtual containers instead of domains because it means that we can control our access groups better."
"Ingestion of logs and raising alert space on those logs are the most valuable features."
"The capability to manage your business policy related to security when required without vendor involvement."
"Risk Engine’s risk score, eFN, GeoIP, and device binding all coming together in the Policy Rules to decide when to escalate to MFA."
"Our customer are seeing value from the product, as they experience cost reductions. They can stop fraud from their customers, then their customers can have a better experience from their services."
"The most valuable feature is the stock tokens. That works the best for us."
"A better integration with other vendors."
"The product must provide 2FA for applications."
"The speed of deployment on the cloud could be improved. It took a few days when it should have been just two days"
"Other features that would improve the product are a single sign-on where people can use their Gmail ID to log-in, etc."
"The user interface and clustering are areas with shortcomings that need improvement."
"There is a room for improvement. The log is a bit difficult to access, and searching the log codes is also a bit difficult. So it would be much better if, when we open a log, it could provide detailed information about errors, reasons for failure, and such."
"There are some protocols, such as SHA and SHA-2, that are not supported."
"No SMS gateway from the ISP"
"The user interface needs improvement."
"I would like to see a more adaptive type of solution, something that we could use on our web pages..."
"Better filters when searching for events. The current features for current filters when searching fraud events are not very comprehensive. You can only filter by certain fields in the transaction."
"Reporting modules is one of the major areas that can be improved further."
"The product is basically unusable. We need better ease of use; it's overly complicated."
"It has taken years to implement."
"RSA Adaptive Authentication lacks a mechanism to verify the identity of a new user in the Enrollment event workflow."
Earn 20 points
Earn 20 points