FlexPod XCS vs IBM PurePower System vs Oracle SuperCluster comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
NetApp Logo
869 views|407 comparisons
96% willing to recommend
IBM Logo
125 views|44 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Oracle Logo
365 views|133 comparisons
83% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between FlexPod XCS, IBM PurePower System, and Oracle SuperCluster based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, NetApp, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Converged Infrastructure.
To learn more, read our detailed Converged Infrastructure Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,334 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"SolidFire all-flash block storage system in an existing FlexPod data center environment. This improves the agility and performance, including the additional load of cabling.""The ability to converge a lot of different data and platforms into a single common platform, then scale horizontally and vertically.""FlexPod has improved our company as far as ease of management, stability, and redundancy.""FlexClone allows you to create copies of volumes in seconds, and without occupying physical space.""It simplifies infrastructure from edge to port to cloud. It proves that deployment is easy and straightforward. There isn't any need to do extra work.""Going from the old monolithic server and silo storage that they used to use is an improvement. With the FlexPod solution, just being able to manage and monitor the overall environment helps.""It's a common platform, which provides for ease of use between all of the blade servers. It uses all the same tech, moving service profiles seamlessly across from one blade to the next. There is also combined support.""FlexPod is easy to setup, maintain and has great stability."

More FlexPod XCS Pros →

"We never have any issues or glitches."

More IBM PurePower System Pros →

"A valuable feature is the Exadata Storage appliance, optimized for database queries.""The performance is significantly improved, and the administration is easy because it is a single platform end-to-end.""Scalability and technical support.""SuperCluster is basically a combination of Oracle, with Exadata and Compute node features, so it is a computing cluster that is integrated in a single infrastructure such that we don't need a separate solution for the application database, the data storage database, and everything else the application needs.""Because SuperCluster is a specially engineered system, we have confidence in that all the components are compatible with one another. Everything runs together as a well-coupled group of machines, and the performance is great (especially the memory).""Our primary use case is for E-Business Suite applications the applications for the government, and most of the applications that use an HCM.""In this setup, the traffic is distributed among the nodes, enhancing the overall performance compared to a scenario where all traffic is directed to a single server.""Unix is not as easy for the users, it needs more maintenance and costs extra."

More Oracle SuperCluster Pros →

Cons
"Updates are not frequent enough.""I'd like to see a little more on the provisioning and the replication piece... Also, I don't want to say analytics are lacking but I'd like to see more analytics.""I would like to see better operations, a single pane of glass to manage and monitor the entire design across VMware, Cisco, etc. I would also like the upgrade process to be a little smoother.""The solution could be improved by including automation for user updates.""There have been issues upgrading the firmware.""I would like more orchestration and networking in-between the VMs, the virtualization layer for networking. I would like to see better tools for this.""Areas for improvement would be the support for the engineering team, who seem to have no clue when you open a case, the communication with and recognition of resellers, and the documentation, with could be more detailed.""They could improve their technical support team. They need to have a specific phone number for you to call in for the FlexPod solution. Some of the partner support knows if it is for FlexPod, they will get you to the right department."

More FlexPod XCS Cons →

"The management is really difficult when it comes to systems with traditional services."

More IBM PurePower System Cons →

"A major issue for us is that after the most recent update of SuperCluster, they have now stopped all future production of new versions. That is to say, after M7 there was M8, and now there are no future versions planned (e.g. M9) in the market.""Not a very user friendly solution.""They may have made some improvements but based on the version that I am using, it is a little complicated because it is based on the Unix Operating system.""We have faced network connectivity issues.""It's not working as we expected. We thought it would be fast and reliable but we are not getting the reliability. It's not stable.""Speaking from a business perspective, our main problem is that our particular edition of SuperCluster is now at end-of-life status, making it obsolete and impossible to get support for. This presents a challenge for us, as finding a path to our next solution is not easy.""If they had an application that centralized the administration, not about the monitoring, but for the configuration, it would be better.""There are many areas for improvement. For example, better guidance in terms of troubleshooting issues relating to ZFS, as well as better tools/diagnostics for monitoring that specific component, to better identify potential issues. Hardware monitoring via OEM 13.2 is not 100 percent, as Ops Center is still required in some instances."

More Oracle SuperCluster Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Pricing and licensing is very affordable from a FlexPod perspective."
  • "It seems very cost effective once it's in place, and it's easy to expand and easy to add capacity without a lot of extra money."
  • "If your company really needs to be up 100% of the time, and you need to do a private data center, I don't know if I could realistically actually recommend another blueprint."
  • "Anytime that you are buying any storage make sure you understand storage. Do not just buy storage based on what somebody sells you in terms of IO or throughput."
  • "Buy storage based on the solutions you need, the technologies you need, and what will make your life a lot easier down the road."
  • "As a whole, it is inexpensive, and it uses the least amount of parts."
  • "Storage is very expensive. To buy MIC cards and additional storage either on-prem or in the cloud, the IT department does not have money for it, so you need a more niche product or a more flexible way to store your data. That is the benefit that you get from this product."
  • "We purchased the solution through CDW. They are a partner and knowledgeable."
  • More FlexPod XCS Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
  • "For us, the licensing costs are a large amount, but we are also paying for the rack, the SLA, and other extras. When I look into our organization's requirements regarding performance, machine load, etc., I believe that, while expensive, SuperCluster is nevertheless good for us."
  • "Due to the multiple products involved in our use of SuperCluster (including different software, hardware, etc.), I cannot comment on the licensing aspect."
  • More Oracle SuperCluster Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Converged Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.
    769,334 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparison Review
    Anonymous User
    Originally posted at www.storagegaga.com/dont-get-too-drunk-on-hyper-converged/ I hate the fact that I am bursting the big bubble brewing about Hyper Convergence (HC). I urge all to look past the hot air and hype frenzy that are going on, because in the end, the HC platforms have to be aligned and congruent to the organization’s data architecture and business plans. The announcement of Gartner’s latest Magic Quadrant on Integrated Systems (read hyper convergence) has put Nutanix as the leader of the pack as of August 2015. Clearly, many of us get caught up because it is the “greatest feeling in the world”. However, this faux feeling is not reality because there are many factors that made the pack leaders in the Magic Quadrant (MQ). First of all, the MQ is about market perception. There is no doubt that the pack leaders in the Leaders Quadrant have earned their right to be there. Each company’s revenue, market share, gross margin, company’s profitability have helped put each as leaders in the pack. However, it is also measured by branding, marketing, market perception and acceptance and other intangible factors. Secondly, VMware EVO: Rail has split the market when EMC has 3 HC solutions in VCE, ScaleIO and EVO: Rail. Cisco wanted to do their own HC piece in Whiptail (between the 2014 MQ and 2015 MQ reports), and closed down Whiptail when their new CEO came on board. NetApp chose EVO: Rail and also has the ever popular FlexPod. That is why you see that in… Read more →
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The system is designed for easy scaling. Because we define everything clearly. So when we plug the system in, we apply… more »
    Top Answer:The pricing is not cheaper, but stability is more important for us now. We focus on business gains, not static numbers… more »
    Top Answer:FlexPod should focus more on automation. Integrating an automation tool with FlexPod would enable customers to leverage… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:In this setup, the traffic is distributed among the nodes, enhancing the overall performance compared to a scenario… more »
    Top Answer:Due to the multiple products involved in our use of SuperCluster (including different software, hardware, etc.), I… more »
    Top Answer:We have faced network connectivity issues.
    Ranking
    2nd
    Views
    869
    Comparisons
    407
    Reviews
    15
    Average Words per Review
    905
    Rating
    8.6
    11th
    Views
    125
    Comparisons
    44
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    7th
    Views
    365
    Comparisons
    133
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    543
    Rating
    7.7
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Oracle MiniCluster, S7-2, M7, M6-32
    Learn More
    IBM
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    FlexPod XCS is the secure platform your applications need from edge to cloud. Easily manage your suite of cloud-native, edge, and enterprise apps. Integrate advanced cloud services without compromising performance, security, reliability, or scale.

    IBM PurePower System offering combines storage devices, networking devices, virtualization capabilities, and management functions into a single infrastructure. The IBM PurePower System offering is provided in several single rack and multiple-rack configurations and vary over time as technology and offerings are increased.

    Secure cloud infrastructure with the industry’s most advanced security, extreme performance, and a complete suite of efficiency enhancements, tools, and automation that work together to dramatically lower cost and complexity.

    Sample Customers
    University of Sao Paulo, WD-40, The Commonwell Mutual Insurance Group
    Information Not Available
    Advania, Dimension Data, Atos, Etisilat Nigeria, HDFC, Specialized Bicycle Components, Uganda Revenue Authority, iQor, United Energy, Portic Barcelona, B Logistics, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, CSC, CNSI, REDISA
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Energy/Utilities Company9%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company17%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government9%
    Educational Organization8%
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm44%
    Government22%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Logistics Company11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government17%
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Non Profit8%
    Computer Software Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business12%
    Midsize Enterprise23%
    Large Enterprise65%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise69%
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business8%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise83%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise69%
    Buyer's Guide
    Converged Infrastructure
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, NetApp, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Converged Infrastructure. Updated: April 2024.
    769,334 professionals have used our research since 2012.