We performed a comparison between ELMA 365 and webMethods Integration Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about monday.com, Microsoft, Salesforce and others in CRM."A lot of customers, when we introduce this kind of product into their organization, it provides a lot of analytics."
"The comprehensiveness and depth of Integration Servers' connectors to packaged apps and custom apps is unlimited. They have a connector for everything. If they don't, you can build it yourself. Or oftentimes, if there is value for other customers as well, you can talk with webMethods about creating a new adapter for you."
"It is a bundled product stack for A2A and B2B usage. It is one of the best products which I have used during my integration career."
"The product supports various types of digital documents, including XMLs and EDI."
"Application integration, business process integration, and B2B partner integration are valuable. But among these, I feel B2B partner integration is the most valuable. This module integrates two business partners and exchanges data through electronic data interchange messages in the form of specific standards, without any manual process needed."
"When it comes to the user interface, I'm already really used to it. I cannot say anything against it. For me, it's easy to use."
"It's very flexible and a good platform to use."
"All of the components are very independent but are tied together to give the business value."
"The most valuable feature is stability."
"Customers want improved productivity."
"The interface needs some work. It is not very user-friendly."
"Support is expensive."
"Upgrades are complex. They typically take about five months from start to finish. There are many packages that plug into webMethods Integration Server, which is the central point for a vast majority of the transactions at my organization. Anytime we are upgrading that, there are complexities within each component that we must understand. That makes any upgrade very cumbersome and complicated. That has been my experience at this company. Because there are many different business units that we are touching, there are so many different components that we are touching. The amount of READMEs that you have to go through takes some time."
"I would like to have a dashboard where I can see all of the communication between components and the configuration."
"I'd like to see the admin portal for managing the integration server go up a level, to have more capabilities and to be given a more modern web interface."
"This product has too many gaps. You find them after update installations. This should be covered by automatic testing."
"This is a great solution and the vendor could improve the marketing of the solution to be able to reach more clients."
"The orchestration is not as good as it should be."
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
ELMA 365 is ranked 67th in CRM with 1 review while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 60 reviews. ELMA 365 is rated 0.0, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of ELMA 365 writes "A great ERP for medium and even small businesses". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Event-driven with lots of helpful formats, but minimal learning resources available". ELMA 365 is most compared with Bitrix24, Camunda and Bizagi, whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods.io Integration, Mule ESB, TIBCO BusinessWorks and Boomi AtomSphere Integration.
We monitor all CRM reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.