We performed a comparison between DeepArmor and Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SentinelOne, CrowdStrike and others in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)."he solution is an anti-malware product that integrates well with other vendor products such as firewalls, SIEM, etc. It captures threat intelligence and gives you better visibility. The product also has sandboxing features."
"This is stable and scalable."
"The solution was relatively easy to deploy."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's firewalling, rule creation, monitoring, and inspection profiles are great."
"The price is low and quite competitive with others."
"Ability to get forensics details and also memory exfiltration."
"The product's initial setup phase is very easy."
"The most valuable feature is the analysis, because of the beta structure."
"It is easy to install."
"I found the initial setup to be easy."
"I have not received any complaints about the performance."
"The platform’s most valuable features are ease of use, integration, and deployment."
"The stability has been great."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is its simplicity."
"It's a stable solution with good performance."
"The setup is not that complex. It takes five to ten minutes to set up."
"The product's initial setup phase was straightforward."
"The solution should address emerging threats like SQL injection."
"The solution is not stable."
"We find the solution to be a bit expensive."
"The security should be strong for the cloud. Some applications are on-prem and some are on the cloud. Fortinet should also have strong security for the cloud. There should be more security for the cloud."
"They can include the automation for the realtime updates. We have a network infrastructure with remote sites. Whenever they send updates, they are not automated. We have to go into the console and push those updates. I wish it was more automated. The update file is currently around 31 MB. It could be smaller."
"The solution's installation from a central installation server could be improved because the engineers had a little bit of trouble getting it installed from a central location."
"ZTNA can improve latency."
"We'd like to see more one-to-one product presentations for the distribution channels."
"The email scanning feature is not available in DeepArmor."
"Malware detection can be better. It doesn't have support and detection for the recent malware, but it has a compensatory control where it can do the behavior-based assessment and alert you when there is something malicious or unexpected. For example, when a certain user is executing the privilege command, which is not normal. These dynamic detections are good, and they compensate for malware detection."
"You do not have access to all the features when you use the Trellix web interface. For example, you cannot do device or drive encryption from the web interface. Also, when we're working with customers, it's sometimes challenging to get sales support. Delays mean we might lose an opportunity. Lastly, Trellix lacks some documentation about custom features."
"MVISION Endpoint is only compatible with Windows 10 and Windows 2016 and above. If I were using a Linux operating system, I would not be able to use MVISION Endpoint."
"The product is consolidating its portfolio into one product. It is difficult at the moment."
"The product could be flexible and offer better pricing."
"The central monitoring dashboard needs improvement."
"The product needs to reduce the usage of RAM and CPU."
"It is a very heavy tool, unfortunately."
More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
DeepArmor is ranked 71st in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) while Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is ranked 19th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 48 reviews. DeepArmor is rated 2.0, while Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of DeepArmor writes "Security needs improvement and email scanning features are not included". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) writes "Reliable with good independent modules and a straightforward setup". DeepArmor is most compared with , whereas Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is most compared with Trellix Endpoint Security, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and Open EDR.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.